C4PT41N_0BV10US
-
Content Сount
4,583 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
15668 -
Clan
[ADRIA]
Everything posted by C4PT41N_0BV10US
-
Jak zostać Królem Krążowników? - Dropsowy poradnik dla kapitanów CA
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in Poradniki ogólne
UPDATE - Zdolności kapitanów zmienione zgodnie z 5.9 -
Yes... yeeees... come to the dark side, we have bigger gunz!
-
Jak zostać Królem Krążowników? - Dropsowy poradnik dla kapitanów CA
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in Poradniki ogólne
Spoko spoko, jutro wrzucę Clevelanda i zredaguję kapitanów, także nie będziesz musiał wpadać -
Zatopiony przez swojego (spotkanie znajomych z forum)
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to UrukSzymon's topic in Rozgrywka
Yup. Generalnie, miły ze mnie gość, choć jak każdy od czasu do czasu się denerwuję. Natomiast nie znoszę jak moje starania żeby komuś coś wytłumaczyć, po przedstawieniu rzeczowych argumentów, są olewane bo: ja wiem lepiej, Ty się nie znasz. Jak na razie mam 3 takich delikwentów na liście Same piękności Elbereth (choć akurat on od czasu do czasu coś mądrego potrafi napisać), Greyshark i Davao. Cudowna trójca -
Jak zostać Królem Krążowników? - Dropsowy poradnik dla kapitanów CA
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in Poradniki ogólne
Dzisiaj pogram trochę i odświeżę kapitanów -
So team battles or season 5 of ranked next?
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to theraven8989's topic in General Discussion
*gasp* You must be joking good sir! Didn't you hear about the amazing feat done by no other then Mikhail Kutuzov! Imagine, around 16.000 tons cruiser, battling against vicious elements of sea - struggle of machine vs nature. Can you imagine better reason to become a naval legend then sail from point A to point B and not sink?! -
premium / zbrojownia [VII] Atlanta
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to _Admiral_Nimitz_'s topic in Krążowniki
Jezu, jak wyjdą nowe rankedy, i znowu będą na VII... Trzeba będzie grać Indianapolis żeby gnoić te wszystkie Atlanty. -
Aight mate, if you say so.
-
I don't know how long you play WoWs, but in OBT and quite a long time after release, Mogami player's had averages around 60 - 70k, while they were doing around 50k in Myoko and 45 in Ibuki's. The US line had averages around 30 - 40k lower, as well as 10% lower win rate. This is the definition of OP - when one ship is so much better then all of it's counterparts, as well as being able to win fights with every other classes. Mogami had no serious disadvantage, none. Then, as it happens, came the HE changes, the armour changes (small caliber shells are now having problems with armoured superstructures) - this hurt Mogami a bit, but she was still doing best from all tier VIII and IX CA's. Then came buffs for Atago - repair party and mobility changes. Atago then quickly rised to second place. And after that, came the BFT, EM and AFT nerf, which killed 155 mm Mogami, without recompensating in 203 mm guns range. Kutuzov got his compensation. As comparing to Kutuzov - Mikhail was a collector ship. It wasn't popular, and still isn't. The percentage of people who bought it tended to have some experience with CA's, or being pretty nice with them. Little number of battle skews statistics suggesting Kutuzov is actually better then it is. Kutuzov is a weak ship - I played both Kutuzov and 155mm pre AFT nerf Mogami, and Mogami was much better. But since Mogami was popular, and large number of people played it - it's statistics being the best with such enormous amounts of battles? It speaks volumes how disgustingly OP that combination was back then. And don't let me even get started how Mogami wasn't OP before they nerfed small caliber HE shells. To sum it up.
-
Zatopiony przez swojego (spotkanie znajomych z forum)
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to UrukSzymon's topic in Rozgrywka
Ej To ja też bym dostał warna/bana, bo się brzydko odzywałem do Davao Ciiiii! -
No, because with 155mm guns she: 1. Outranged every tier VIII CA and few tier IX CA's 2. Outdpsed every tier VIII and IX CA's 3. Was equally effective agains BB, CA and DD 4. Could invisi fire with large margin of range Didn't it bother you that Mogami players all had substantially larger average damage and win rate before the nerf? Like 25k bigger average and 5 - 10% better win rate on Mogami? Virtually, Mogami was so good, it was still better then tier IX cruisers. It could easily win with Baltimore, without loosing most of her's HP. Now, I love good cruisers. Atago is a good cruiser. She's tough, do good damage, and she's stealthy. But, she has it's flaws - short range and long reload, and a poor AA - and you call her the best of the tier VIII CA's (to which I agree, but place Hipper as second). Now Mogami with BFT, EM, AFT was having all that (she also was tough, since she never really had to close distance) and had tremendous range and dps. Mogami was OP, good she's not. Bad she's overnerfed.
-
Ja jestem gorącym przeciwnikiem IFA. Na krążownikach nie ma na niego miejsca, bo wraz z nadejściem 5.9 każdy punkcik będzie dobrze wydany. IFA rozleniwia, IFA pozwala Ci siedzieć w lornetce zamiast rozglądać się po mapie, IFA uczy złych nawyków. Przynajmniej na krążownikach, co do reszty się nie wypowiadam.
-
No widzisz, a ja na dziób tankowałem bardzo ładnie. Na pewno lepiej się tankuje Clevem niż Indianapolis, Pensacolą i, tak, I said it, New Orleans.
-
I disagree. Mogami pre BFT and AFT nerf was OP and it needed to be nerfed. And I'm glad that it was. Unfortunately, as it happens with nerfs, she was overnerfed. 15,7 km range on 203 mm guns at tier VIII is just to low. Give it 16,4 or something like that, and Mogami will be a very good cruiser.
-
Znaczy, masz pewnie trochę racji, bo Budionnym nie grałem dla zasady, więc być może, jest lepszy od Cleve. Natomiast Clevem grałem na rankedach w tym i poprzednim (2) sezonie i był absolutnie dominującym okrętem. Budionny pewnie jest lepszy, bo i trajektoria lepsza, torpedy, sowieckie wartości penetracji. Ale, nazywanie go szrotem etc. jest błędem. To dalej jest bardzo mocny okręt. Duży dps, dobry pancerz, zwrotność, "znośne" camo jak na VI tier - jest ok. Aoba jest np. gorsza ogólnie niż Cleveland. Ma swoje działki w których sprawia się lepiej, natomiast solo carry potencjał ma mniejszy, podobnie jak Nurnberg, Farragut, Minekaze czy tam Mutsuki bo nigdy nie pamiętam. Najgorszą VI w grze obecnie jest Ognievoi. Cleveland po prostu nie jest OP, od początków CBT zresztą przestał być. Ale, ruski szmelc mnie w ogóle nie obchodzi, poza tym że fajnie się paziuje aspirantów na komandirów.
-
Once again, it's not the turrets that makes the difference, it's the ability to damage modules/sections of the ship. 155mm just lacks punch against many ships, and after one or two salvoes, you just do minimal damage if any. 203 mm on the other hand, not only more reliably put's fires, but also do significant damage. Furthermore, you can't "spam HE and fires" on a cruiser with 15,7 km range, where any BB or heavy CA will be able to reliably hit you, that's not how any of this works. Sentiment towards 155mm guns are from pre - BFT and AFT nerfs, where you could spam shells from 18 km while being invisible. You had very good reload, range and okayish turret trawerse. Now you have none of it, so, again, why is this even debatable. You lose turret trawerse, which means that your real DPM goes down quite a lot, since you have to wait for the turret to aim after even medium dodge manouver. You don't have range, so your shots need to count - something 203 mm is much better for. You don't have AP penetration needed for quick brawls with other CA - again, 203 mm has. You don't have HE damage, since 155mm shells just splash over upperstructures of Tirpitzes and North Carolinas with minimal effect. Only advantage you have is 5 more guns with bigger RoF, but that doesn't provide any bonus, gain or gimmick. To not be without proof, two screenshots, check it out: 203 mm salvo: 155 mm salvo x 3
-
No nie. Jest bardzo dobrą szóstką, jedną z najlepszych, przynajmniej jeśli chodzi o krążowniki.
-
Great, until you realise, that fire chance is actually better on 203mm guns, due to better accuracy, and damage from fire + HE damage is tons better on 203 mm. The only reason 155mm were good with AFT, was that BFT, Expert Marksman aaand range were all buffing 155 mm guns performance. Now they don't. 155 mm HE shells do laughable damage on armoured targets, whereas 203 mm shells do typical HUGE bursts famous on IJN CA's. 7k, 8k shots are nothing strange in Mogami with 203 mm guns.
-
Is, in current meta, in current patch, choice between 155mm and 203 mm even debatable. Nothing speaks for 155mm, apart from RoF. 155mm does absolutely nothing about armoured targets at that tiers. 30 - 40 hits for less then 2k damage. No turret traverse. No range. Nothing. So, why would anyone pick a 155 mm?
-
Is this even a question? With which captain skills exactly? Currently I grind Mogami slowly, as I don't really want Zao that bad. But with 203 mm it's okayish. Damage is really nice, but the range is hurting so much. But after some practice games, you can do really well in Mogami, although she is not the OP [edited]she was some time ago. And good riddance.
-
Well, we have Indianapolis which is just better Pensacola, so... yeah, I think we would get just better NO, or worse Balti.
-
GIB! On the side note - yeah, Wichita would make a nice premium. She's a little less known then the rest of the US cruisers, and would make a great tier VIII premium. Unfortunately, the way the US CA are implemented, tier VIII is pretty lackluster. That would mean, that Wichita would be either straight up better then New Orleans, which is not exactly fair and good idea, or it would be same/worse, which means it would occupy bottom levels of might in CA family. Both of those possibilities are not exactly what I would look forward too But I would buy it, that's for sure
-
PRAWIE! Głupi sztorm wszystko zepsuł!
-
Jak zostać Królem Krążowników? - Dropsowy poradnik dla kapitanów CA
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in Poradniki ogólne
Dodana USS Omaha.- 418 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- krążowniki
- król
- (and 5 more)
-
Jak zostać Królem Krążowników? - Dropsowy poradnik dla kapitanów CA
C4PT41N_0BV10US replied to C4PT41N_0BV10US's topic in Poradniki ogólne
No wiem wiem W weekend wrzucę coś więcej
