C4PT41N_0BV10US

Tak, tylko Ibuki po pierwsze ma dużo większy zasięg , po drugie w miarę sprawnie obraca wieże, a po trzecie montuje moduł na kamo. Ibuki to zdecydowanie IX tier. Zao jest oczywiście lepszy, ale nie różni się gameplayem od Ibuki nawet troszeczkę.

I am aware, that drawing tier V's to VII's is not a thing WG want's to do. But I experience this problem greatly since last patch. I played maybe 8 or maximum 10 games on Murmansk and Marble, and had like 5 tier VII games streak. Then one game purely IV and V's, and then another three on VII. Now, this is bad, or at least looks bad. Cause tier V was flooded with players, so out of 10 games maybe 2 would be with higher tiers. I wonder, and hope that it is not true, if the playerbase is now too small and people grinded slowly through V's - and not many new dudes are coming up. Or is it just some MM quirk that was introduced last patch.

Nu, ale 102 średniego Ibuki bardzo fajne. Zao też jest spoko.

That's not correct. Currently there are two issues with MM. First one is on tier V, which drags a lot of ships into tier VII games. It was especially fun tier, since tier V usually fought against other tier V's, sometimes VI. Now it's rarely limited to V. And again, tier VIII are often drawed to tier X games due to low tier X numbers, especially afternoon.

Dunno man, but, how in any imagination someone would release RU CA's before RN, French, and Italian navy? You can never be sure what is going on in WG staff heads.

Need to colonisation intensifies. But I also hope it's only the annoucement of their new project about those mechs, and that it will not impair development of RN CA's. Or I will find those few CC's from PL section that assured me that RN CA's will make it this year, and force them to eat excessive amounts of british food.

Dobra, wbiłem rekord. Chciałem 300.000, ale tyle też może być. Dla nieogarów jak panda - post #4

See, you already answered to your problems

LoL. Ibuki jest super. Celny, mocno bije, daleki zasięg, super skupienie, odnowienie HP. Bardzo bardzo dobry krążownik. A i tak mam zaniżony średni damage, bo grałem z Azellem i Czachcia i mieliśmy bitwy gdzie zrobiłem 30k, a i ostatnia bitwa zlamilem i zrobilem 15k. Więc spokojnie można nim 90 i więcej wyciągnąc jak ktoś się stara. Bardzo, baaardzo dobry krążownik.

Yeah, you're right! But, let's not forget few other dudes, AFT, BFT and EM nerf that instantly dropped all >155 mm guns cruisers 10 - 20% average damage, and killed Mogami right where she standed. Oh, and Lexington 2/1/1 deck - RIP. Oh, and Midway and Essex 2 torpedo squadrons - not anymore. Oh, and invisi shooting on Zao and Des Moines - we remember. Yeah, poor clueless players!

Perk z 4 poziomu jest bardzo dowolny. Żadna z tych zdolności nie zmienia stylu gry w sposób na tyle rozbudowany by się nad nią długo zastanawiać. Jeżeli chcesz robić kapitana z AA - proszę bardzo.

You wot m8? 3.5 tysia? Z bensona w Atago?

hnnghhh... gib!

I also noticed that, but on a RU server. Also, I had a spree of tier VII games in Murmansk and Marblehead. Marble struggles greatly, but Murmansk manages due to range and mobility. But it's not the best time for tier V, I admit. Usually tier V was the fun spot, now it's pretty hard

German Cruiser line is a tricky one. If you already sailed US cruisers, GE demand different playstyle. First of all, most of your damage for tier V and VI will come from AP ammo. AP on GE CL's is extremely potent, but you need the basic knowledge of how to use it, where to aim, when switch back to HE. Second, ze germans are a bit more squishy (yes, it is possible), which means you need to pick your fights with more care. And last, try to avoid long range spamming, since it does little to no damage at all. Try to use you camo, as weak as it is, to close the distance to your prey and devastate it with AP to broadside. On tier V and somewhat at VI pick hydroacustic for extra DD hunting capability. If you enjoyed US cruisers you should also enjoy GE ones, as they bring something totally different and pretty fun. About Yorck on tier VIII - I heard that after buffs shes decent, but you should use mainly HE ammo on her, an oddity in the line. Tier VIII, IX and X are excellent cruisers, with Hindenburg being unfortunately pushed out of it's role by Moskwa. But, overall, 5/7 for whole line

This is golden

Panda, Ty i tak wiesz, że tu między nami jest ramię w ramię w wiecznej sztamie. A z tym gwałtem to nie było tak... Ja chciałem ja squirtle, ale ona mi snorlax, i tak wyszło.

Co mi tam jakiś HMS Royal Oak dla plebsu. Krążki Panie krążki! Krążki to życie, krążki to styl bycia, krążki to ognisty seks z 6 dziewczynami na plaży w Rio. Royal Oak jest dobry dla starych ludzi, jak panda.

PICS OR IT DIDNT HAPPEN.

Pociśnij górę o jakąś CA premkę Royal Navy po tych Scharnhorstach i Dunkierkach i Eugenach.

Średnio się sprawdzają CV, więc owszem, ja też nie sądzę, że sprawa o wiele trudniejsza do zbalansowania mogłaby być wykonalna przez WG. Ale, taki pomysł. Natoooooomiast, dużo fajniej by się sprawdziła linia krążowników Royal Navy *wink wink*

Gdyby tylko istniała gra gdzie mógłbym sobie popływać pancernikiem, krążownikiem, niszczycielem lub lotniskowcem... gdyby tylko.

Niektóre akurat miały ze 2 - 3 działka przeciwlotnicze, ale no, nie jest to 16 lufek 127 mm. Nie no, dajmy sobie spokój z kutrami torpedowymi w WoWsie. Jedyna opcja żeby one miały "jakikolwiek" sens, to jeżeli by zostały zaimplementowane na zasadzie CV. Okręt baza wypuszcza szwadrony kutrów które następnie torpedują lub atakują z działek. Ale tego, raczej bym nie liczył nie.

Yo, RogDodgeUK, can you tell me which rule I've broken in post #98 so you removed it completely - I understand censoring harsh language, but I'm clueless (pun intended) why you removed that post - care to explain?