Nov_A

"shids better now" They dont state how much, which is a bit strange because that short explanation leaves a lot to interpret.

Hi all, [Answer] 14 (fourteen) . Nov "A"

1. The players participating are either absolute try-hards that will insult your every move or generic random bots not caring about a win 2. Testing ground for submarines that offer little to no active or engaging gameplay 3. Limited map pool with low player count, giving CVs more control and power over the game 4. Established boring meta for ships due to imbalance by the game mode or ship characteristics So for it has always been the same issue for me every season I participated, which often lead to me losing any interest in ranking out. The players that you encounter are just an absolute chore to endure, even worse than in randoms.

Got a shared first blood.

Dont worry, they will compensate with more planes and subs.

tbh fam ngl For me personally, the T6 madness is better than the T10 standoff before. That does not mean I consider it good, just not as bad. We also ran into some good clans experimenting on triple DD, single BB and CV, this seems to work good as well. Why exactly WG thought double T6 CV would be a good idea, I dont know.

Okay I seriously dont know if I should feel cringing or harrassed by this picture.

I dont care about the CC drama and I am more than fully aware of WG. Since this poll is explicitly targeted at personal consequences due to hurt CC feelings, I chose the option of "not going to change anything" because neither was this my personal last straw nor my wake up call to realize WG's shady business tactics and complete disregard for their own players in any way imaginable. There were and will be more than enough opportunities for this - again.

A for Effort, but you forgot to add a poll.

"Free" stuff with low effort: Yes Everything else: No

Pretty sure he is running WoWs on TempleOS.

I trust them to do the most stupid thing possible.

Two hours in MS Paint

Despite my prejudices and bad experience with the WG customer support, this actually fixed it. I got mad because right after the previous patch my server connection with WG went sour and my game was an absolute annoyance, while the WG tool showed nothing and other online services worked fine, but in the end the tech support was able to confirm that it was my ISP having trouble reaching them during high traffic times and it got worked out. Sorry WG for being rewd

Ignoring all balancing issues just to add a delay and call it a day, without foresight of possible technical problems between split second values and players with a bad connection. Thats the point, the delay does nothing, except that point and click adventure players cant dab on active DDs anymore. The problem is, my connection now dictates when a strike is ready, because 3.8s serverside will not end when I assume 3.8s on my side. Yeah, there is lag compensation, but when there are split second values that can result in hit or miss/rng rocket spread hits just because WG's servers have a jumpy connection, paired with the inability to correct an attack course, then I refuse to play. I literally wrote there are more grave matters why I dont want to play at the moment, like the sudden increase of latency since the last patch, even though I never had problems before and the WG tool not detecting anything. Re-Installing did nothing, no mods were used. But since this only has an effect with rocket planes due to short timing and no way to change course on the x-axis after comitting to a strike, WG literally found a way to artificially protect DDs by wobbling on the server cables. Until they find a way to fix this, I will sleep.

He does not, but now I have a reason not to, thats just hole'ish behaviour.

'bout tree fiddy

wat Frontline had an airstrike (single strafe, no indicator, low dmg), an artillery strike (areal bombardment, long wind up and continuous attack) and a spotter plane (linear reconaissance) consumable in its first iteration. People would just spam that shite on caps or players they dont like, the airstrike was only effective if you picked the right attack direction or a weakly armored target, most just used it to decap or win a 1v1. Artillery strike was used against groups but in glorious WG hindsight it was also able to track and completly destroy a T8 heavy in place. There was nothing tactical in Frontline from the start, only the eternal grind and the hope of a collectively less dumb team. In fact, even more devastating air- and artillery strikes were already available in the Stronghold mode, initially used to dig out camping enemies, but to this day it is mostly used against a push or hulldown targets because WG introduced a protective skill based MM, meaning only camping clans will face camping clans anyways. No wonder, since it can basically kill 1 tank on its respective tier with ease.

Among other more grave matters, I am refusing to play WGs no indicator split second value flashy effect simulator. Half of that battle drop is me stopping to get even autismo numbers in CVs. Wake me up when artificial DD protection ends.

Pretty ironic for somebody with a roman inspired name.

They hated Jesus, because he spoke the truth.

First time talking to BoW?

You see Comrade Russian CVs dont have attack planes that could suffer from this nerf.

*torches ur T10* *survives your game with 1HP*

IJN all the way. Only on T4 the Rhein is better than Hosho, since she got nerfed hard. KM CVs are very situational and suffer from weak planes and high AA exposure. In the current meta of full AA builds and instant panic buttones, IJN is the better choice, especially if you want to grind them, as the whole line is quite strong, contrary to the KM. No. If you have to use your AP bombs against DDs, you already fucced up hard somewhere else - multiple times. IJN can fight DDs with rockets and well placed torps quite effective, AP bombs are only to disrespect them or if your calculated target ceases to exist and you just want to get rid of the drop, before the game ends. Massively depends on the enemy DD and your angle of attack. Overall, they are not a good choice against DDs and provide little damage above the spotting or forced turns. Torps are much more effective and basically do the same. Play the heccin game and try to win, KM CVs have armament against every class, but cant really use a chosen one against another target. Sometimes it is more valuable to just harrass a DD with AP rockets by providing spots and force turns, disengagements, etc. than farming damage, which is basically the essence of playing KM CVs well. Just dont expect too much from the Weser or Parseval.