SV_Kompresor

Is that the equivalent of throwing a tantrum?

You okay?

I personally find them slightly less toxic to play against. And also, there are ocasionally cases when a CV can support the team. Something that's very difficult to do in a sub due to how selfish their gameplay is.

I disagree...massively

Ok. I thought you were sarcastic.

Ok so let's make it between three of us....do you usually quit the battle when you spot a CV or do you not? If the answer is yes, then my original comment is still relevant.

Yeah, keep making stuff up. No amount of advice I could give you would help you in particular I'm afraid. Not even against the worst of CVs. Mostly because you don't listen to advice anyway and you quit the battle if you spot a CV apparently. It's interesting how the players on the other team "somehow" manage to win against a CV now that the enemy team is missing a ship isn't it?

The two classes are still the most influential. Not entirely sure what point you were trying to make. Other than arguing for the sake of it.

I don't see him mentioning damage. You're the one that brought it up.

I mean....he is correct.

I went to check like 3 times....can you quote it because I cannot see it. Maybe I'm legally blind idk. If I am, I'll apologise. But even then, it's completely irrelevant. Going afk increases your team's chances of losing. Period. That makes it bad. Edit: actually I think I get it. You said it in some like....third random thread nobody knows about. Nice one.

For griefing your own team. Because you never did say that. Isn't it stupid to see your teammates throw the game because they don't have a spine? Well...if a team has an afk teammate, then they have the full right to blame him. It's never a guaranteed loss, but it definitely makes it far more likely yes. It really doesn't do much to disuade them does it?

Well, it is your fault for being afk in that battle. And basically guaranteeing the loss. If that was a bannable offense (from ranked), the game would be a better place. Hopefully one day it will be.

Not as a deployable weapon. Maybe minefields could be usable as a map hazard.

In another words, it is your fault.

No

Imo when it comes to superships, CVs are the least problematic since they aren't that different in effectiveness from their tech tree counterparts. Unlike other superships. But they still shoupdn't exist obviously.

Venezia, zao and moskva too.

https://forum.worldofwarships.eu/forum/131-deutschsprachige-community/

The only comfort I can find in this is that most non whaling terrible players will go broke playing supersh1ts even if they have premium.

I wish you lost all your credits for even attempting to play them.

It didn't take long to figure out your CB preferences either I'm afraid.

you mean, we don't want those players making it easier for us to get steel. We already did. You refusing to acknowledge it is another problem entirely. The simple fact is: Your first suggestion is garbage. Your second suggestion is good. But you want to somehow force both into the game at the same time....or something. Nobody at this point knows.

Yes, except those are not randoms. Because you choose them. You decide whether they join your battle and you decide what ship they play. You don't rely on random matchmaking. That is why the second suggestion (where you browse through available mercenaries that you want in game or browse for available clans) is a good one and the first one isn't. Em....what you're suggesting would actually help my clan win since we'd just steamroll through clans that don't use voice chat. Doesn't meam it's a good idea however. Just play random battles if you want to play with and against random players. Where's the issue.