SV_Kompresor

Well CV economy is broken but then so are carriers themselves....If I had to choose I'd tell WG to rebalance carriers first and only fix their economy afterwards. I think I've only been top of the team maybe like 5 times in high tier CVs

I just need to complete the third mission to get the leander because I have all the others already so it's enough time for me, but to complete them all? Not even close

You just discovered an easy way to get banned from the forums....cya

I doubt it....it's annoying but doesn't make enough of an impact to destroy the game

you might want to use normal text instead of friggin columns? lol

I do like the look of this map though, just perhaps with a small island near C

there are actually....(check papedipupi) and quit the game if you meet him on the other team

No, but I do think that if there are 20 missions for non CV players and one for CV players, non cv captains shouldn't complain about it

Yes, nobody is forcing you to complete a mission

1. if you use manual bombing they'll hit just fine 2. i find that hard to believe unless there's some idiot who wasted 5pt skill on a tier 5 ship (and I've never ever seen a tier 5 carrier with it so far) 3. US carriers: -Larger squadrons -Less squadrons -Very good for specialized air superiority -Good at specialized bombing IJN carriers: -Smaller squadrons -More squadrons -Very versatile I suggest you switch to japanese carriers, in my opinion they're much easier to handle, although they do require more multitasking

Bismarck (it doesn't have long range aa though)

Both points are true, and yes bismarck would be just as fun without hydro as it is with it, I just see no reason to remove it at this time Well they do deserve it a bit

I wonder the same thing about you

Ty it took me hours to make it up. And being a hard counter is not really a good thing. Sure, DDs are indeed meant to counter BBs in some situations, but now there's just one bb that isn't defenseless when fighting dds . A good reason for it keeping its hydro? How about the fact that it's unique, not overpowered and fun to use. Sure it could be nerfed to 4km but removing it isn't necessary.

Yeah....I was 7 kills short too, it's the only arp ship I haven't gotten...oh well, better luck never-time

Like has been said in several other threads: credits

Because this isn't rock paper scissors....it's wows

I don't encounter stealth firing without smoke frequently enough to consider it annoying enough to remove it, so I vote "no"

Well I don't feel like that....hydro doesn't make you immune to torpedoes because it's kind of difficult to dodge them from 5km, and any dd that knows bismarck's strengths will stay clear of its hydro

Must have ships? DDs: Benson, kiev CAs: Myoko BBs: Colorado (for me anyway), Gneissenau, Bismarck, North carolina

Well for what it's worth I completely agree with the title of this post....nerfing hydro won't make bismarck any less OP, because it wasn't OP from the start....it's strong but not op. It's only op if you're in a dd and you forgot that bismarcks have hydro, also why are 80% of complaints made by players who haven't tested said features or ships?

Reinstalling helped me when I had this problem....I haven't encountered it since

it's a little small sig

Your stats: