SV_Kompresor

That's not really true. You can get ohio for about 1.8m fxp. That's still less than smaland.Plus normal xp is easier to get than fxp. Coal also requires a lot more time to get.

It doesn't. Just yesterday I used up 200k fxp to skip it. I find the ship to be worse than monarch not just tier for tier but in a 1 vs 1. The guns are worse because the reload is 5 seconds longer and the citadel armor appears to be much weaker for some reason than on the monarch. And because of the armor the heal suddenly becomes worse than the one monarch uses because if you get citadeled (which you will) it can't heal anything and you're suddenly left with a heal that reloads almost twice as slow. Personally I find the ship about as bad as fdg, and that's saying something. I'm sorry that I cannot give you any advice other than skipping it.

I wouldn't go that far, but what I would support is a spotting delay like the one with radar. Basically a cv would have to keep the ship spotted for several seconds in order for the rest of the rest of the team to see it. If it's spotted for less than the minimum required time, the team never sees it (except on the minimap). What?

Once a collection is unlocked you can get collection items from normal containers so it's not that much of a loss. A bit annoying but....it is what it is

I mean....you only need to get one container for the collection anyway.

Doesn't prevent me from disagreeing with stuff.

Wait what? That's actually still a thing? I haven't seen those since beta.

Isn't there a hardcap on tier 6 CVs? Or is it just me being lucky and not meeting two of them for a very very very long time?

I'm gonna have to disagree with that. But hey, it does eliminate the problem of meeting 2 CVs, so at least there's that.

This is a forum. This is what it is for. Depends on the situation but yes. Being spotted doesn't necessarily mean under attack. As I've said. You need to judge the situation. He wants bigger maps, he'll get bigger maps. Also, I think that 600 battles is about ripe for tiers 5, 6 and 7 Yes

While I agree that having 2 CVs in a match is way too much, you're wrong on just about every other thing. So let's go over them. Low tier maps could be a bit bigger...but just a bit. Being in a dreadnought (or got forbid a pre-dreadnought) that can only do 20kts would be a horrible pain otherwise. Also, they're not community contributors...they're cruisers (CL or CA, not CC) In lower tiers nobody knows where to go. And that is a problem why exactly? In most cases it won't stop your attack even if you do get spotted, just as long as you're good at judging the situation. Yes, two CVs in a single match are a bad thing. Too bad WG isn't listening. Then I suggest you start playing tier 5 and above. Those maps are large enough to usually prevent the enemy from shooting you instantly. Also, knowing your detection ranges and trying to actually dodge the planes helps. (btw...if your AA range is greater than your spotting range turn it off by pressing P). If a DD dies in the first 30 seconds, that means they're just a bad player. Nothing more. That's beacuse a lot of players are dumb enough to not equip them. (I'm sorry but it's the truth) This statement proves you don't know anything about the game. That's tier 4 for you. Do you propose they one shot DDs everytime instead? Do one attack and recall the planes. Or just spot it for your team. Yes, WG should increase the AA values on all tier 3 and 4 ships, yes WG should implement a 1 CV hardcap on all tiers not just 6,7 and 8, yes WG should do a lot more rebalancing and yes it can deter players from coming into the game. That being said, most of these problems could be avoided if WG just found a better way to educate players on how to play the game. CVs are a part of the problem yes, the other part is you not knowing how to play the game well because you haven't been playing it long enough.

How about turning the border into a minefield? Like the ones in dunkerque operation?

The maximum XP values are bugged. The server just makes them up. That being said, you can track these broken numbers here. https://wows-numbers.com/ranking/?order=max_xp__desc#

Um...no These are tier 9 perma camo bonuses. They give 10% better repair costs and 50% higher xp than lower tier camos, for a tier that needs it the most.

Yes. Because tier 9 perma camos are more useful than tier 6 ones. This year's camo reward is definitely better. Also, what's there to be fair?

It would certainly be more fun to see.

I've been saying it for a long time. Give the detonation a massive animated explosion and a bang that can be heard from every corner of the map and I'm happy.

https://worldofwarships.eu/en/content/modstation/ It takes literally 3 seconds to find

This

Not really no. It's just another of those passive grind events for a ship I have no intention of buying anyway. I'm probably just gonna forget about it and collect the rewards I get from passively playing.

I genuinely can't tell what this thread is even about.

No, never. Go for premium time instead and use credits or coal for signals.

Don't forget to use survivability expert on BBs

That's actually good. Early access is designed to prevent the battles from turning into a one nation conflict, which is what happened every single time when a new line was released in the past.

They might as well make a ranked system without actual mm but just based purely on how high on the scoreboard you end up. The higher up you end , the more points you get. The higher on the losing team you end up, the less you lose. Now you just need to earn a certain amount of points to reach a certain rank and that's it. Heavily limit the BB cap to prevent them from having too much of an impact on point "saving" and you're done.