LemonadeWarriorITA

How does it matter that they were never build? I just suggested some better ships for the current meta imo.

How do you mean? Paper as in tankiness or as in never build.

IMO you are better of with a Montana or Kremlin.

I think some are a personal nerf bat that don’t require WG making changes.

USN is a bit easier, besides Monty is a better ship for winning games imo.

KM BBs are fine, SN BBs aren’t. Unfun to play against.

I do think WG should create a Kiddie pool for those below 58% and <1800 PR with 3000 games. After that you get an achievement that unlocks a new gamemode.

The problem with the current match making is that you put 2 different kind of players in the same game. Players who like to do pew pew and players who like to win the game. My suggestion would be to give team buffs for capturing areas, so that the guys who like to do pew pew also contribute to the game.

Interesting position to die in a Yamato. I usually report battleships who go over there.

I kinda feel like this game is lacking HE spam, so I'll get one to change the meta a bit.

I am actually playing an IFHE Hindenburg to tame the new Russian BB line.

Carriers can strike and spot anywhere on the playing field without taking any risks. Of course ships won't go through the middle when there's a CV present. It doesn't mean it is the solution for better gameplay. I personally see carriers as part of the problem; degrading gameplay.

Such an interesting statement. It reflects the intelligence of a CV player.

True that, but with carriers there isn't much depth in gameplay. So you are quickly done with it.

I know CV players aren't skilled, because I have played CVs myself. I find them boring to play, because there isn't much of a challenge in playing them, besides I feel pathetic when I strike DDs with rockets.

Yea, WG is also not interested in skilled gameplay. Rip skilled players, welcome subs and cvs. Eventually the cv player will also get gut stats in surface ships the more skilled players stop playing. I will try a few CV games tomorrow I guess. But it kinda demands me playing with my own poo to come at the skilllevel of a cv player.

Mmmm... what about removing CVs from Randoms and let them play at their own level in Coop?

Because I feel pathetic and boring like hell when I play CVs... CV players are a bad thing to this game, didn't you realise? Yes, CV players are lazy and unskilled. You are starting to understand.

IMHO CV players should only be allowed in Coop, because they are fighting against a bot mechanic, so to be honest they wouldn't even notice the difference. If there was a skill counter it would be a different story. They can have fun with subs. Yes, CV players are not the same as the others, because they are fighting pure bot mechanics. No skill involved. Why would I complain when the bot class can't fight against bot mechanics? He tried to counter my fact with a useless fact. It is not just about fire damage, the longer the duration of a fire is, the longer a ship will have extended concealment.

Getting insulted by a CV player. Very interesting.

Whatever Al mechanics they roll out overhere won't differ from other servers, unless I play on Chinese server.... Man, looking forward to subs, because I love getting double penetrated by Al mechanics. Perhaps I can stream some content for some xxx websites.

I don't know why you are so ignorant, but if you would only think a second about your argument you would also know it doesn't hold up. Instead it is don't nerf my CV, because I like playing against bot mechanics.

It is a waste of my time explaining game mechanics to a CV player. Not sure what I am even doing on this part of the forums.

When can we expect a skill counter against CVs? When will you fix the fire duration? WG, why are you so darn slow?

Just dodge. /s