Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

Nauseica

Players
 View profile  See their activity

  • Content Сount

    628

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    10926

  • Clan

    [EUTF]

Posts posted by Nauseica

  2. Posted

    Are you dropping/falling from the paradise/clouds guys ??

     

    Its business and a company that wants to get as more money as he can get with no morality in the end , ye sure in the start he wants to look nice to attract victims ehm customers but after an established market pool aka victims he stops to care

     

    Im closing my wallet hahhaaaaaa ... sure your wallet got empty by them long time ago .... like it or not CM people doing WG work to look nice for you , they arent got payed by you to represent you on WG but its the other way around. Some are cool and nice but in the end their paycheck is payed by WG and if WG wants a submarine with secondaries and planes on it it will be announced as the best balance ship ever.

     

     

    • Cool 1

  5. Posted

    I dont really care and i dont count what im getting from PTS cause it feels a 3rd job doing that when i just want test some ships/builds in PTS and grab something for free but

     

    How hard is it to program a routine on PTS and transfer to the players all the rewards in one batch which like could be
    A to F names at monday 3am
    G to K names at Tuesday and so forth so at Friday all had been delivered

     

    Russian scheduling and programming at 2023 oh wait we dont at all :cap_haloween:

  7. Posted

    It kinda easy to replace (but why !!!!) Dasha with Tina if you want if you ask a modder cause from what i remember Dasha dont have a voiceover so its just a picture

     

    Short version would be download aslain mod install the lady commander mod and find in the pictures the Dasha to replace and make your own Tina pic for it

  10. Posted

    2 minutes ago, BruceRKF said:

    I like that the new tech tree ship seem to be reasonable representations of historical plans.

    However, the Japanese are the only navy left that legitimately has enough plans for battleships and battlecruisers to make a complete tech tree for both, or at least from tier 4 (you could skip the t3 battlecruiser, I think). WG is probably just too lazy because lower tiers make less money for essentially the same effort (research and modeling is not that different between tiers, I imagine).

    I also do not like the fact that WG randomly chose 457 mm as the calibre, just to protect the poor BBs. Cruisers surely will be happy to have even more ships that can overmatch their midsection armour. Why not make the guns 460 mm, as they should be, and let BBs suffer as well, just a little bit?

    You implying that russian research can distinguish the difference between 3mm on naval ships when they couldnt build a semi floatable BB at their imaginary shipyard :Smile_hiding:

  11. Posted

    So Japanese BC only stuff they have is 2,2 sigma and a gimmick -20% dispersion due to plane and 12km sea detection with stealth module/captain spec

     

    Typical bad AA:cap_rambo: very soft armor  :Smile_unsure: low health :cap_fainting: big turning radius :Smile_child: and big rudder shift time :Smile_trollface:

    So if you get spotted and get shoot (CV/sub etc) and you want to flank with a ship like these you will get murdered fast so you will have to stay back and just shoot with accurate guns and blame the lose to subs/cv and that dd that wanted to cap and win the game.

     

    So a worst British BC line over all atleast on paper until now
    As always interesting gameplay choices as always from your part as WG design and probably as these went with the other BB american line in next 14/18 months we will have the hybrid BB/cv line of the Japanese fleet ......

     

    Bring it on
    morpheus-matrix-fight.gif

  12. Posted

    I dont really hate any of them

     

    Its WG fault that cant make a decent mechanics for some of them
    I liked alot the rts cv's but when i decide to start playing them the made the revamp of them and i didnt bother again

     

    Subs again i liked and played alot Silent Hunter games but how they work here is meh .....

    • Cool 8

  13. Posted

    I had vote a week ago for a "YES"
    now if i had to vote it would had been a "NO"

     

    Dont get me wrong the mode is still fun but WG nerf it in the easiest way they could and made it uninteresting atleast for me.

     

    I played some Worchester games on the weekend cause Zao wont be that good on it and instead of napoli i wanted to play Worchester to done the 4th July mission/Marathon but i found late that some of them cant be progress on AB ... its my fault but why i should play this mode now.

     

    Matchmaking sucks if you are a cruiser, you get shoot all the time and BB's can close in and take all the xp from you ... ye its fun in a way and i like it but i dont get something in the end except some abd base xp and some silly community tokens ...

     

    so yeah ...... :cap_fainting:

    • Cool 2

  14. Posted

    Just a small/big nagging from my side

     

    I decide to play some Asymmetric Battles with a cruiser and since i have few of them i decide to play Worchester and also complete the Captain mission for the Liberty one and also do some of the Marathon for the Virgina one.

    After of few games on Saturday and Sunday i notice that the 2nd part of it it EXCLUDES the AS mode battles ... :Smile_amazed:
    I know its my fault that i didnt read all the requirements of it and i should know better by now how WG operates and makes missions but that sucks

    Why you will remove some of modes from it and especially the AB one :Smile_facepalm:  .... its a rhetorical question dont answer i already know the answer ...
    I dont care much about the marathon i wasnt planning to fully completed it anyways but first you nerf AB eaarnings you dont fix matchmaking of them and then you had exclude AB mode for some of the missions.

     

    9 days ago AB was fun and could be balanced abit to be more fair but as always when you accidentally make a nice mode so people can have fun you just nuke the hell out of it to be so meh after few days.

     

    GG WP

  15. Posted

    19 minutes ago, lup3s said:

     

    idk, I grinded Kita and Yuugumo in Asymmetric Battles and it worked out fine

    I even played a couple with CLs like Colbert, Jinan, Smolensk ... the guns never stopped firing. :cap_rambo:

     

    Sure you have to be a bit more careful in your DD / CL / CA than if you were in a BB, but it's not as unplayable as some make it out to be.

    It kinda depend on your map and also how your team mates play cause if your BB's decide to just yolo and die and you left with 2 cruisers the game is kinda horror story to carry it if you dont have some torps on your ship

     

    I played some Kitakaze and Napoli games and went decent due to my bb's staying alive.

  19. Posted

    So instead fixing the actual problem of this mode which is that all the bots shoots the low health dd's/cruiser ships and the BB's they just charge in and kill all bots you do the easy thing as always.

     

    Its like saying
    hey people we notice that when a car crash all passengers that had safety belts on they dont die as the other "normal" people on the car so we are removing the safety belts so all players will feel the same on the end.

     

    GG people
    well-done-good-game.gif

    • Cool 6
    • Funny 3

  20. Posted

    I knda like it, sadly people will always abuse something useful so its on the company side to police and force the rules but sadly we all know how much WG police their games :Smile_hiding:

     

    As for end is near from people or quiting of this feature oh well cya in another game and not here again right

    Spoiler

    the-end-is-near-homer-simpson.gif

     

    • Cool 1
    • Funny 1

  21. Posted

    1 hour ago, Yedwy said:

    Esp with the jedi bots that know where torps will go the moment you launch them and only effective way of doing any torp damage is driveby

    Personally i unlock the bot i want to send torps and then fire them at his last estimated direction 3 out of 4 times it hits him , i have the "feeling" that when ever i fire torps on a bot that i have locked it downs they are torps on his way

    • Cool 1

  23. Posted

    On 6/21/2023 at 4:20 AM, lost_reptile said:

    If you could put it in a google drive and share it with me, I would greatly appreciated it! I am working on his Kancolle UI too, and there are a lot of catching up I have to do, so any help is appreciated!

    I remember posting a link on my post for that file a mention but dont know what it happen to it as it seems is been removed/delete it, il try to remember to re upload it today after work and post a new link.

×