piritskenyer

DD - Destroyer BB - Battleship BC - Battlecruiser (absent as distinct class ingame) CB - Large cruiser (absent as distinct class ingame) CA - Heavy cruiser (formerly armoured cruiser, hence the "A"; ingame not distinguished from the CL's) CL - Light cruiser (Ingame not distinguished from the CA's) CV - Aircraft carrier CVA - CV, Attack CVL - CV, Light CVE - CV, Escort

What ship is that alongside Musketeer? (Also, it's ORP, not OPR)

Me thinks Hawkins-class Is the Hawkins class just an upsized Kuma with 7.5" guns instead of 5.5" ones? I call T5 material on it.

It's been stated before that mixed calibre main weaponry is a no go. Mixed calibrelength weaponry is present, but mixed calibre is not and will not be implemented. Also, it's not a 6-foot gun, it's a 6-inch gun, so you should use " instead of '

Join the Academy

it'll get better.

Help me. My winrate is plummetting because of self-proclaimed "pros" in my team who get killed off faster than it takes to say. I haven't managed to break even on winrate in the last week

Just look at mine, you'll see pain and suffering for the leftmost stat.

Thank you for making me laugh out loud at work. Very relaxing

I got it post nerf, so no, I don't remember what a special [edited]snowflake it was. Balancing error maybe, but loo at it now. It's still a balancing error, only it the way of absolute shittiness. That whole ship is one big mistake either way, so it maybe just should be completely rebalanced from start to finish or just deleted.

That 37 seconds is in reality 38.1 seconds. Just saying now.

I had 6 games in this piece of floating sh1te, and I won exactly 1 of them. That one game I won was one where I went back to the A hull and put the 155's one becuse I thought that it can't get any worse anyway. I seriously wish they nuked this ship out of the game outright instead of having people suffer it

Soooo, I ust completed a WoWs survey

That looks like a loooot of work

Yes, she WAS better stock than maxed, but I think we could have done with her not being nerfed to the ground but instead been levelled between the two setups. You need to grind the xp anyway, and most players will buy the hulls so why not? If we are completely honest, researching the 8" guns makes no sense, since those are pretty much the same guns that can be found on the Aoba and the Myoko, and then on the Ibuki. Don't get me wrong, I'm not arguing for them to be better stock, I'm arguing for them to be interchangeable, because there aren't many ships in game that have flexibility on the level the Mogami had. Also, not every stock ship sucks, just because they don't have their peak potential unlocked. Yeah, I think that would also have been viable. After all the major complaint was that they were firehoses beyond reason. While they certainly were intended, they were not completed as CA's, and they certainly weren't terrible CL's. I agree that with BFT and AFT she was more than a pain in the ar$e, however, removing BFT and AFT from the calibre would, IMO, have been largely enough, it's really the EM that made her 155 setup stink (and I'll keep saying this, if we're going to use historicity as an argument: the 155 turrets now turn way slower than they ever did in real life). She already has the shortest max range of any of the T8 CA's.

I disagree. I found Mogami's survivability to be rather poor compared to the previous ships in the line and the Atago (even discounting Atago's heal). Her armour only holds up only against almost straight frontal cruiser fire, everything else is bound to inflict significant damage. Her maneuverability isn't all that great either IMO, which makes dodging incoming fire a bit more tricky.

Well, then I shall stand corrected. Stiil, a big red remnder could have been nice, but oh well.

Ticket to support then.

Except they are not being faithful to history. While yes, Mogami was intended to be used as a CA from the start, the CL config was never historically as terrible as it is in game now. In short, the 155 setup is overnerfed. And maybe historically speaking they were never used as CL's in combat, but in game, it would be the only outstanding feature of an otherwise boring-as-all-hell (and frankly not very good) ship. That plus the modularity most players liked about her pre-nerf made her unique and interesting.

Yeah, not everyone can. Some people can go as much as 2 weeks without being connected, so I'll stick to the lack of prior notice as being a legit complaint. Don't be ridiculous. Putting out a warning well in advance on the main page with a frickin' date would have been enough. That's not the part where we disagree. Their fault lies in not indicating clearly and well enough in advance the GFD'd end date ("the event's end" as a term is pretty vague if you want to plan ahead, don't you think?). Maybe if I write it down three times you'll get that concept through your head.

I don't exactly understand the question. He bought a premium ship for money, as in real money. So far so good, yeah? Now log into the client (download from here) and she should be right there in your port, ready to sail. One thing though: If this is going to be the very first time playing the game, DO NOT under ANY CIRCUMSTANCES go out with the Murmansk first. Playing a tier 5 ship right off the bat w/o any prior experience is (or should be) a criminal offence, as you are only a hindrance to your team without any knowledge of game mechanics. Play up to T5 with regs first.

While a nice point, most people don't troll and abuse bad players, they abuse idiots. There is a significant difference.

What failures is that on the player's part? Not being able to look at the main page because he had other things to do? Yeah sure, just because you don't have a life outside of the game doesn't mean others are like that. The failure here seems to be the lack of due prior notice. Ie: notifying people a week or so in advance that there is a deadline after which diamonds can't be spent anymore. For some people, no, 38 days was not enough because they were amassing diamonds for a grand-slam buy-off before the deadline. That's what I was planning, but my RL commitments made so that I managed to collect a whopping 140 diamonds in the duration, so when I realised I was never gonna get any more, I spent 100. If I had waited till today (since yesterday I didn't get to check the homepage...) I would have been screwed just as well. Summa summarum: communications failure. Again.

Well, the supposed reasoning behind the 155mm setup of the Mogami being worse than VMF 6" cruisers in general is that Mogami was not intended to be a CL, she was built as such to hvae a pseudo CL in the fleet since they were rearmed with 8" guns shortly before the war, etc. In reality wether they were intended or not, the 155mm triple mounts could train at a rate of 6°/sec, and had a maximum rate of fire of 6/min due to the powder hoists not being able to supply any more (when pusghed to their limit that is...), so what we have now is a nerfed-to-the-ground version of the triple 155 mount. EM used to bring the rotation in line with historical stats though, so that's a bit problematic.