piritskenyer

Why do you even get trolled? Anyway, nice meeting you, let's hope you'll be in a better mood next time

big words from a fuckwit

Oh, I understand. Well, fingers crossed Maybe try getting into contact with a community contributor so they can give you access to some ships?

Why so hostile?

I was starting o think something happened to you Acheron.

Sorry for dropping on the forumite team, my connection decided that I wasn'T going to be playing anymore this evening.

Oh I don't get it? Tell me more.

Excellent! Je l'ai installé, il est super. J'espere que tu vas etendre la ligne de Type 5 pour la majorité des vaisseaux, c'est le type que j'utilise sur la pluspart de mes croiseurs. Merci pour le bon boulot! (I installed it, it's superb. I hope you'll extend the line of Type 5's for the majority of the ships, as that's the type I mainly use on my cruisers. Thanks for the good work) EDIT: Est-ce que tu pourrait faire des mods pour les vaisseaux ARP? Ca serait la bienvenue (could you do mods for ARP ships? That would be very welcome)

He was a fat cretin who had nothing to do with commanding anything higher than an air wing. There is a very distinct reason why naval aviation is handled separately from the air force. Luckily for us, he was too coked (or morphined) out of his mind to acknowledge that.

Every cruiser is a onehit victim if they go about brawling with BB's. Is it really so hard to run that one thing through people's heads? Expose your broadside, be evaporated. Same for the Cleveland (although less so because it has rtard small citadels), same for the NO, same for the Myoko, the Mogami, and same for all the cruisers that I'm not going to list out, because it applies to all of them. Cruiser armour isn't meant to withstand BB fire, it's meant to withstand cruiser fire. And that it can do when angled.

As far as I know the 190 was not selected (and not even seriously considered) mainly because Fat Hermann was throwing a hissy fit every time any other armed service said they needed planes. The 109T was, as you said, based on the Emil, and I wouldn't be surprised at all if the Emils in question were BoB survivors being phased out in favour of the Friedrich, just thrown at the Kriegsmarine. As such, the KM recieving any 190's (that were intended to eventually rearm the whole Luftwaffe - or at least that would have been the theory) was outright impossible. That said, there was a picture of a 190 armed with a torpedo posted somewhere around here, which suggests that at least some attempts were made to somehow navalise the 190 (or even just coastalise it).

Tell me about it The Pepsi is actually my favourite T7 cruiser, so I know how shafted she is. That never stopped me from getting good results with her

The fact that it's different doesn't make it bad. Adapt to it after being on the most overpowered ship of the line tier-for-tier and stop complaining about it. Floating citadel? Welcome to high-tier CA gameplay. In compensation you get 10x 8" guns that are better at HE than Germans and better at AP than Japanese and at close range than Germans. Install the rudder mod, unlock all the modules and then go on kiting enemy shells that are fired at you. If you can do that, you'll be able to pumell enemies while noone can touch you. If you can catch an enemy cruiser out broadside on at less than 10 km, you can quite simply blow them out of the water with one or two salvoes. Fun fact: the only thing that really shafts this ship when fully upgraded is the detection range. Now stop crying about it not being overpowered and go rek face.

No. The Pensacola isn't bad, you are bad in it. The Pensacola is very differen from the Cleveland in that it's no longer a spammership. Get the stock grind out of the way and then come back. The only valid point where people get to beat on the Pensacola is the detection range, it would otherwise be fine.

Basically, they'd have to be balanced between their identical tier cruiser and battleship. Say Deutschland is a T7, she'd have to have something like 2.7-3 r/m with good AP and okay HE. She'd be better than a CA in a BB role, and better than a BB in a CA role, but worse than either in their respective roles. She shure as day wouldn't make it as a top tier CA.

Yes please. I have myself argued for this in the past, let's unite and make it happen

Met cherry2blost earlier today, and he had no idea who I was when I said hi

Proud 48%-er making threads left, right and centre Oh and this is a N&S thread, so should be nuked quickly

hmmm. Let's see... No.

I'll tell you why the Mogami isn'T gonna get any better: it turns like a brick even with the hull upgrades, so your hopes of dodging incoming fire at virtually nonexistant. (Unlike the Atago)

Could be fun. If it's like the ARP/Dasha Perova proposal, I'd like to see it.

That's really [edited]slow o_O

Wait, didn't they mention Australian ships as possible prems in Crysantos' Q&A session? I wouldn't rely too much on that video. As much as Challenger is a whizz (or is he?) with tanks, I'd doublecheck everything he says on warships. 30knots indeed seems low thought, but I don't have time to dig now.

Oh come on...

You really had to go and trigger Waroch while I was not looking, did you? I for one wasn't aware of details (I'm a BB and CA/CL guy), but I did know that there were quite a few designs to make a full tree. About the German aircraft topic (and this has been discussed elsewhere I believe, maybe on the WT forums): I for one think the Bf 109 would cut it, but would ultimately be unsuited for carrier use. A bit like the Spitfire which many regard as having been on the whole unsuited for carrier use due to the narrow landing gear arrangement (that apparently allowed for narrower wing-fold) which is always more unstable on the ground, not just on a damn ship. Also, the 109 was starting to show its age by the end of the war (there is only so much you can pack into the original airframe before having tho rebuild it from the ground up) The Ju 87 while an interesting and effective aircraft in the Spanish civil war and the beginning of the 2nd WW, was also showing its age: Fixed undercarriage limited the speed The low speed in turn made it an easy target Carrying capacity was becoming inadequate (that bloody siren is ridiculous against well-trained gunners, I mean come the fnck on) One thing though to the defense of the Ju 87 being employed as a ground support unit: you have to remember that DB's are at that time the airforces' precision weapons. Bombing from level flight is rather inaccurate* and compared to that aircraft that can "launch" their bombs into a target are with a 20m radius are like a sniper rifle to a HMG. The ideal ship-borne aircraft for the Germans would have been unquestionably the FW190, due to: Wide and very robust landing gear Low take-off, landing and stall speeds due to the rather large wing surface Heavy cannon and MG armament for the fighter role High carrying capacity due to the large wing surface Can be employed in divebomber and torpedo bomber role So in essence had the Germans ever made the 190 work as a carrier-borne aircraft they would have had the ticket: one plane, three roles fulfilled (4 if we count nightfighting). *"B-52 bombing from 30000-40000 feet is very accurate. They hit the ground every time."