YabbaCoe

To bohužel nejde něco jen tak odložit o týden, o měsíc atd. Už takhle se ponorky přesouvají více než rok. Všechno je totiž dáno plánováním, kdy která linie a které lodě příjdou a pak podle toho se přidělují úkoly a deadliny, kdy se musí tyto věci udělat. A víš jak, nikde v práci nemůžeš říct, že sry, já to nestihl udělat. Je to možná odfláklé, to je možné, ale já třeba upřímně nevím, kolik přesně lidí na tomto pracuje, kolik další práce mají a co všechno to vyžaduje, aby se jeden takový model udělal. Možná pokud je tu někdo, kdo si doma modeluje některé věci, či se v tom vyzná nám o tom může říct víc, co to všechno vyžaduje. Navíc se ve hře nemodelují jen lodě, ale hromada dalších věcí.

Thank you for your detailed feedback on all those topics of the Waterline video/devblog. With submarines, those changes were tested internally and also that special Public Test will show results on bigger scale. I am also curious about that new type of torpedoes, that subs will get. But atleast it is visible, that we definitely took all player's feedback in account and made changes, where requested. SuperBBs looks interesting. I also made a typo and mentioned H-44, Hannover is basically H-42. Attack aircraft should definitely make life of DDs a little bit easier, if they pay attention. Honestly, I like the idea since first I saw this concept. That statement of submarines was a mistake made by one of our colleagues, as he meant the won't be implemented in current engine and circumstances. Well game involved a lot since than and over a time it became possible. Also that is why he appologized in the video. It was my typo, sorry for that. It is H-42, not H-44 as I mentioned. While we already have Großer Kurfürst, what another name would you suggest for this ship instead of Hannover? And they are massively tested. That is why it is taking so long since first announcement of Submarines. This announced special Public Test server is next in line, as we had seveal testing versions before. Launching them to Rankeds will allow us to see, how they behave in live server conditions, before they would probably be launched to randoms.

Obě tyto varianty, jak H-42 tak H-44 byly zvažovány do tohoto speciálního eventu. Byla zvolena "menší varianta", přece jenom je to speciální event a výsledky z něj nám dají informaci, co následně udělat dál s těmito loděmi, pokud vůbec. Ono proč německé bitevky mají trojdělové věže. Ono taky z balančních důvodů, navíc zamýšlené projekty mají také varianty, co by kdyby. Vzhledem k efektivitě GKčka, jsem rád, že má 12 děl, než kdyby jich měl přesně podle projektů pouze 8. Máš samozřejmě pravdu. Jak jsem naznačil, VV byl z Romy zkopírován, jako sesterská loď. Mě osobně je líto, že VV nemá svůj vlastní upravený model, aby měla správný počet kotev, které stejně vlastně v bitvě nepoužiješ, ale s tím se bohužel nedá nic dělat. Taky ber v potaz, že modelování jedné lodi klidně zabere i 3 měsíce a občas prostě není čas ztrácet čas, kor když se jedná o sesterskou loď.

Actually not. If you play constantly, you could receive plenty ingame rewards, maybe unlock some special ships and you simply have much much more stuff than a player who stopped for some time. But if somebody isn't playing for certain time, of course we are trying to get him back to the game via certain offers. Honestly, all gaming companies are doing this, as I am constantly receiving plenty similar emails. This:

Just to confirm, what was said here. Hydroacustic search is different to hydrophone. Hydroacustic search won't be removed from the game. Only hydrophone that was showing the direction of closest submarines, when it was nearby. Good point here. What I meant there, that we had to limit the time, that submarine spends underwater, which was actually based on gathered feedback from previous tests. Just imagine if they still wouldn't need to surface, it would be difficult to play against. So those limits of batery is basically a way how to also fight against them So how exactly would you implement gasoline to squadrons?

I am not sure, if we can implement such a change to MM mechanics or not, but we simply currently don't want to make skill-based MM. Good point. But this report basically only lowers karma down by 1. I meant, if he is creating tickets for Customer Support just because is playing bad. Of course, if somebody is insulting another player in chat, that is a really good reason to create ticket for CS for further punishment of those violators. I don't agree with your statement. You don't get chatbanned for pinging minimap. You get chatbanned if you insult others or you use swear words. Random is still random. Why do you think it is far from random, how biased? We are always interested in addressing all issues, that are mentioned by players and we always share your feedback to devs. After that it is up to them, if to make changes, if the make sense, if it is even doable, compare the sentiment to different data, because quite usually they are quite opposite.

Nesouhlasím, z jednoduchého důvodu. Kdybychom nic do hry nepřidávali, tak ve hře zůstane pouze hrstka hráčů, jenže ten stereotyp a žádná změna by je taky časem přestala bavit. Těžko soudit, zda ve WG víme, co vývoj znamená. Nicméně kdyby to, co tvrdíš byla pravda, tak by nikdy nevzniklo World of Tanks, který se už na trhu drží přes 10 let a stále se těší vysoké hráčské popularitě a potažmo i World of Warships je chápán, jako úspěšný produkt, také i z důvodu, že počet hráčů i po pěti letech neklesá. Takže kdybychom nevěděli, co je to vývoj, žádná z těchto her by nikdy nevznikla, ne? Pak s tím spojený je i vývoj herních mechanik probíhající neustále na těchto produktech. Opět, kdybychom nevěděli, co to znamená, dávno by ani jednu z těchto her nikdo nehrál. Samozřejmě jsou věci, které během vývoje hry jsou brány negativně ze strany vokální části komunity. I já souhlasím, že balanc AAček a vůbec interakce CV není plně dokončen a je stále na čem pracovat. Tomu také odpovídá nová mechanika kulometu, který označuje, kam pak přiletí rakety. Toto by mělo pomoct DDčkám případně podniknout manévr, aby se tomuto náletu vyhnul.

This will mostly be question of skill of both, but if that happens, please let me know the result

Those events are usually time limited, but our collaborations with HSF usually returns after some time. So it is most likely, that you will have a chance to obtain, what you are missing in future again.

Well, if I personally agree with that... also a way how not to concede a goal But, I got the information, that though Flint is marked as premium ship, as status of special ships are only for tier X. But we divide those ships according to their way of purchase. So if a ship was sold for ingame currency, but not directly for money, therefore it is also subject of change. The suggestion to maybe add there for which currency the ship was purchased was sent to devs.

Bohužel VV byla brána, jako sesterská loď Romy a tak se zakládá právě na modelu Romy. Je mi jasné, že to je trochu líné řešení, ale vlastně od menších nesrovnalostí s kapitánskou věží je vlastně vymodelovaná správně.

Mohl bys být v tomto konkrétnější? Kterou existující loď "neumíme" vymodelovat?

Taky cleveland je podstatně novější loď, než De Reyter a především výzbroj je poměrně dost rozdílná. Proč tam není Tromp? Protože byly zvoleny jiné lodě a Tromp se tak může objevit později.

You can request account deletion, if you would like. But unfortunately no refund will be provided.

Those are personalized and allocated on different circumstances. Some of those are winbacks, so yes also for those that returned after certain time...

A proč myslíš? Oba tyto projekty se zakládají na reálných a velmi známých projektech...

Hra se neustále vyvíjí a je potřeba také upravovat mechaniky a přidávat nové věci. Tak je to se vším, pokud neinovuješ, tak tvůj produkt ztrácí na atraktivitě. Vzhledem k parametrům si nemyslím, že by tyto lodě měli být na vyšších tierech, možná třeba De Reyter na pětku s přimhouřením oka, ale výše ne. Tyto věci i lodě vyšších úrovní byly pečlivě konzultovány se samotnými zástupci Holandského námořnictva. Teď nevím, jestli přímo ministr, či jeho tajemník, je velkým hráčem WoWs.

As we have plenty things announced with this Waterline video, those will be also different dates for each event/feature. With Airstrike, yes, it will be a special gimmick for Dutch cruisers.

Have you even seen one squadron in the air for 3 minutes in the battle? After attacks they return to the CV. Though I would agree, that time to rearm or to get new plane should be maybe longer. But still the gasoline won't change anything here...

Those personalized events are definitely not based on ship class you are currently playing. So definitely not any CV bias with this cashback offer...

No, why should be? Planes can fly in the air as long as they have gasoline. Without battery which also creates oxygen for the crew (atleast understood here in this regard), submarine can't stay underwater, as crew would suffocate.

I am glad, that you are looking forward for Dutch ships a well next dockyard ship will be a Dutch one, too. Thank you for this. I was about to mention, that IJN subs definitely were not as numerous as Soviet ones.

I see, those will be interesting to try indeed. Too soon to provide exact numbers on that. I am pretty sure, that you will be able to test all attack aircraft, once it will appear on PT.

" The Commander skill tree for submarines has been added, and the skills of the other classes will be amended to counter submarines. Along with these changes, players will have access to a free skill reset. " Well, as was said, some DDs won't have them, if they historically didn't have them. But afaik, Fletcher had depth charges...

With Subs, some changes needed to be done. Also they will first be tested on special PT server and after that they would be moved to Ranked battles first. But still it can take some time for that PT testing. Regarding Superbattleships, yes, some of current BBs are paper ones, but those are actually following blueprints and plans, basically pushing the development of artilery further. Adjustment firing: Yes, this is what the current gameplay is about, so in this special mode it can be tested to pay more attention to that, as you would be rewarded for playing that right. It was mostly the stress on the "universal" wording. And yes, my appologies, I should use the name Hannover... So far only Satsuma and Hannover were announced as Superbattleships, there is no mention, that there should be russian superbattleship. With soviet submarines, not entirely.. they managed to sink some ships and were operating quite a lot. Still most likely one of the three biggest Submarine nation...