Jump to content

XueLong

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    61
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    5801
  • Clan

    [YARRR]

2 Followers

About XueLong

  • Rank
    Leading Rate
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Not Telling

Recent Profile Visitors

218 profile views
  1. XueLong

    Hindenburg Nerf - An conceptual failure

    Yeah. Stalingrad performs like WTF-Balance-where-did-you-go => It's because of the audience only. And its NOT because of the ship itself. How about you switch for shipowners of Stalingrad for 2 weeks with, lets say SimsMK2, and then have a look at the obviously should-be-awesome stats of the SimsMK2, because audience only. Sorry, but such an obvious disbalance, which is done on purpose to glorify the mother-Russia-navy in contrast to every other nations destroys the health of the game.
  2. XueLong

    Hindenburg Nerf - An conceptual failure

    Hindenburg was too good, hence WG gotta nerf it. Seems legit to nerf ships which overperforms. Meanwhile.. Ship Nation Battles Winrate Frags Damage Exp Planes Kill/Death-Ratio Stalingrad U.S.S.R. 22 933 65.47 % 1.36 110 303 2 177 1.60 3.00 Worcester U.S.A. 353 932 52.83 % 0.89 73 914 1 729 2.81 1.77 Moskva U.S.S.R. 1 449 949 49.85 % 0.74 71 527 1 556 1.36 1.34 Des Moines U.S.A. 2 903 204 49.73 % 0.83 65 972 1 639 2.53 1.37 Zao Japan 2 969 002 49.33 % 0.84 77 258 1 578 1.24 1.74 Henri IV France 578 297 49.31 % 0.79 77 131 1 586 1.42 1.60 Minotaur U.K. 2 294 263 49.02 % 0.90 64 092 1 574 2.81 1.52 Hindenburg Germany 3 648 546 48.83 % 0.77 73 040 1 592 1.51 1.45 Salem U.S.A. 60 966 48.69 % 0.85 72 573 1 582 2.19 1.45 source: https://wows-numbers.com/ship/3760109008,Stalingrad/ Conclusion: Yup. Hindenburg needs a nerf.
  3. XueLong

    Other examples of regional differences?

    @OP Some may be too old. Some just got "accidentally" deleted by WG €U. Cause u know, they dont like when ppl pointing out they are greedy and milk €U players. ===> Careful. WG know they messed up. But wont admit it. And they are DELETING threads concerning the missing christmas event topic. proof: -multiple threads opened -over ten thousands views added together -over 100 replys -tons of likes => 2 warnings, in both German and English, and threads removed without telling others a s*** out of 3 forum threads: 1 is still there. http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/69481-ru-na-asia-give-free-1680000000-credits-to-everyone-eu-player-0cr-zero/page__fromsearch__1 1 is locked and archived to somewhere where nobody can finds it. http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/69313-christmas-event-is-it-really-too-much-to-ask-for-a-fair-treatment-for-all-regions/page__fromsearch__1 1 is removed and u cant even search for it. ***: lol. and WG even secretly edited my signature which contained this picture: ***: and added again. Removed Threads, reasons from WG: XueLong,You have been given a warning by moderator.Reason: EDUCATIONAL WARNING---------------------------------- Dear XueLongThis message has been sent to you to inform you of a warning received regarding the post presented below :SpoilerXueLong, on 22 December 2016 - 12:59 AM, said: XueLong,IceyJones has sent you a new personal conversation entitled "LOL".IceyJones said:----------------------------------did WG closed your topic!?!seriously......[edited]WG---------------------------------- XueLong,You have been given a warning by moderator.Reason: Ermahnung----------------------------------Hallo XueLong,wir möchten dich mit dieser Nachricht über einen Regelverstoß informieren welchen du hier begangen hast:Spoiler------------ QUOTE ------------XueLong, on 22 December 2016 - 08:32 PM, said:Original ausm Englischen:http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/69313-christmas-event-is-it-really-too-much-to-ask-for-a-fair-treatment-for-all-regions/
  4. Hier der Beweis: -die Threads -die Likes -die Warnings und Löschen der Threads
  5. habs auf Englisch auch die Leute gewarnt: WG löscht Threads bezüglich des Weihnachts-Konvoi Event einfach weg. Tonnenweise Spieler, die sich beschweren, tonnenweise Posts. Ist denen egal. Vorsicht, bevor eure Posts auch der WG €U Zensur zum Opfer fallen. &&& Die haben sogar mein Signature heimlich verändert. Nützt aber nix. Bild ist wieder drin. original: http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/69802-where-the-heck-are-the-christmas-convoy/#topmost Careful. WG know they messed up. But wont admit it. And they are DELETING threads concerning the missing christmas event topic. proof: -multiple threads opened -over ten thousands views added together -over 100 replys -tons of likes => 2 warnings, in both German and English, and threads removed without telling others a s*** out of 3 forum threads: 1 is still there. http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/69481-ru-na-asia-give-free-1680000000-credits-to-everyone-eu-player-0cr-zero/page__fromsearch__1 1 is locked and archived to somewhere where nobody can finds it. http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/69313-christmas-event-is-it-really-too-much-to-ask-for-a-fair-treatment-for-all-regions/page__fromsearch__1 1 is removed and u cant even search for it. ***: lol. and WG even secretly edited my signature which contained this picture: ***: and added again. Removed Threads, reasons from WG: XueLong,You have been given a warning by moderator.Reason: EDUCATIONAL WARNING---------------------------------- Dear XueLongThis message has been sent to you to inform you of a warning received regarding the post presented below :SpoilerXueLong, on 22 December 2016 - 12:59 AM, said: XueLong,IceyJones has sent you a new personal conversation entitled "LOL".IceyJones said:----------------------------------did WG closed your topic!?!seriously......[edited]WG---------------------------------- XueLong,You have been given a warning by moderator.Reason: Ermahnung----------------------------------Hallo XueLong,wir möchten dich mit dieser Nachricht über einen Regelverstoß informieren welchen du hier begangen hast:Spoiler------------ QUOTE ------------XueLong, on 22 December 2016 - 08:32 PM, said:Original ausm Englischen:http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/69313-christmas-event-is-it-really-too-much-to-ask-for-a-fair-treatment-for-all-regions/
  6. One might ask, what is the amount of Gold/Credits WG €U prevent us from getting, unlike all the other servers? In other words: How much does WG €U screw us over? Someone on reddit has calculated it and made a very good sheet to display the missing amount for every single EU player: So its -11150 Gold (or Dubloons or so, since WG broke their promise to unify all 3 games btw) AND -16.800.000,00 Credits. For every single one of us compared with every other server. Or considered with the credit conversion: -22682 Gold. =>> Hypothetical Question: What would you do with an additional 16.800.000,00 Credits? <<= Which every single player on other servers like NA, RU and Asia can get for free. Yes, can. Because they are given a free choice whether they want to play to get these ships or to pay. This free choice has WG €U taken from us. They only want us to PAY$$$. GJ at loosing valuable long time customers by treating them like trash / cash cows.
  7. There is an english adage/byword (English is not my first language, sorry for these mistakes) for it I think. It's something like: "Fool me once, shame on you. Fool me twice, shame on me." WG is loosing customers in the long run. Sadly they don't realize it yet.
  8. Changed the info. Thanks for pointing this out! Exactly. We understand that WG is a company and wants to make money. This comes before truely balancing ships (Sims, Yubari..). You can do this to a certain extend, but once you overdo it, balance got more and more screwd up and game evolves more into "Pay to Win". If 0.5.3 will include the heavy buff of Mikhail, are ranked players, especially CL/CA players, forced to buy her, just if they want to stay competitive at high tier area?
  9. Based on this post of MrConway, in which he explains the decision making process behind Wargaming - why to nerf AFT and directly nerf mainly CLs of every nation, but only buff one single Premium Ship, the Mikhail Kutusov, strongly. In short, because of personal opininions are sometimes not completely objective, I don't want to say much at first. Instead I provide the data & statistics for you (source: SIMS, MIKHAIL) from wows-numbers.com, then also another additional source, http://warships.today. Please make your own opinion first, my own ones will come at last. In MrConway's post he mentioned Karsun has explained the reason behind the nerf to AFT and buff to Mikhail. It's because her statistical performance. Allright. First, let's quote his post: Talking about statistical performance and the need for a buff/nerf, lets just compare the statistics of another premium ship, the Sims, with the Mikhail. Sims first: Next Mikhail: As you can see, Sims is always the worst performing ship, from counting every player in to the best 5% player's performance. In contrast to her, Mikhail is already mid tier when considering the average players statistics, and is the best ship of all T8 cruisers, when considering statistics of experienced player, even outperforming the Mogami in their current state. After 0.5.3, lots of ships will be nerfed, especially the 155mm Mogami, and Mikhail will receive a huge buff even more. Again to quote MrConway: With the changes to AFT the Mogami in particular seems to be suffering and is UP compared to Mikhail Kutuzov, are there already plans to buff her?No plans at this moment. As stated in the original post, we’ll keep a close eye on the statistics and if a buff is necessary, one will be done. We put satisfaction from playing as a very important part of our development process and balance of a ship is part of that. Why did Mikhail Kutuzov specifically get a buff to compensate for the change, but not other ships?Due to its statistical performance. As said earlier, its balancing was not perfect during implementation and we’re addressing this issue. Ships like the Sims are performing 10% worse (considering average players and even 11% worse(!) than their counterparts (Kiev) - considering the best 5% players. And in the hand of a skillful player, the Mikhail performs 8% better than the same tier ship, New Orleans. Both ships are premium. One you can still get, she's new, in a shiny ~60€ bundle. And one (currently) not. For me personally, its pretty obvious why Wargaming has made this decision of a nerf to nearly CL, but at the same time give a huge buff only to the (Russian) Premium Cruiser Mikhail Kutuzov. In regards to statistics, Mikhail doesn't need a buff, not even now. She outperforms most her counterparts. After 0.5.3, with over 19km range, machine gun firing speed 12 shells, and awesome AA, she definitely will dominate all other T8 cruisers hard. "Satisfaction is very important" I read in MrConways post, and "balance of ships is a part of this". If you look at raw numbers only, I cannot believe his statement. Other Premiums like Sims or Yubari(the AA part especially) got shafted with the 0.5.3 patch, and only the newest Russian Premium gets a huge buff. Perhaps because WG didnt sell enough of the Mikhail, perhaps WG tends to make Russian ships better comparing with same tier ships (Murmansk). This kind of policy of WG definitely will have a big influence on me in the future, when there are special offers again - hopefully not in Bundles - and I'm thinking about purchasing them. In fact, I'm thinking about never purchasing anything from WG again due to their policy at the current state. Perhaps my opinion of view is not very objective, what do you guys think about this issue? Please write down your own thoughts about the nerfs of AFT and the buff of Mikhail! P.S: in terms numbers of one source is not absolutely correct, here is another source from warships.today. Ofc numbers cannot be exactly correct like WGs own numbers, but the tendency of performance of Mikhail comparing to other ships is quite obvious to see:
×