praetor_jax

I guess they will make a decent-to-good game with chances of becoming a great game and then they will sink it by themselves. Gaijin seems to be good at that.

If you want to earn xp andcredits you need to win the game & be useful to your team. It really is that simple. No need to spend actual money on the game. Whinign wont help though. I would recommend to you to read through the newcomers section of this forum where you can get quite a few useful tips about how the game works.

opinion = / = knowledge

Sichere Information oder nur Spekulation?

War ja nur eine Frage der Zeit bis sowas passiert

Gebaut von den Deutschen, aber die gesamte Besatzung ist britisch

Disable the Yokosuka port (as in - choose any other port). Done. Was that so hard?

I see, you re one of those people who never do anything wrong. Good for you.

Schön gesagt. Aber der TE ist trotz seiner Äußerung nicht zwangsläufig Rassist - solche Sprüche sind ziemlich verbreitet, viele Leute denken eben nichtmal darüber nach was sie sagen/schreiben.

I really liked both ships (well, i hated the Clemson until that gun upgrade - it transformed her from being ok-ish to a mean little beast). I think i did better with the Izyslav, but i never felt the Clemson was much behind her.

I had the exact same experience - looked at the upgrade a few times and couldnt work out what it did (i even checked how many guns - as in gunturrets - there were but missed the actual number of guns), installed the upgrade anyway, feared i had a serious graphics glitch with the twin guns... and then i realised that it really added 100% more guns

Du bist bei Tier 8 angekommen und dir ist nie aufgefallen, dass du im Spiel auch alle Schiffe siehst, die deine Teammitglieder sehen können? Ab zurück in die Anfängerecke und Guides büffeln! ;-)

I have to agree with most of his points. Still dont think its pay to win though, premium ships tend to have more extras that make them special, but overall they feel on par with standard ships.

You have a point here - though the OPs point seems to be that torpedoes can not harm a battleship itfp. But that is obviously not true as the armor belt is not supposed to protect against topredoes anyway and hit that were scored against the belt proofed to be rather destructive (although not classic penetrations similar to artillery shells). Szent Istvan was no predread though, Kongos designation as a battlecruiser stays questionable (every nation has different standards in that regard just look at how people tend to designate Scharnhorst class as either a BB or a BC) after the upgrades and Prince of Wales would probably not have been saved by the best damage control in the world - if a hit gets the ships own internals to rip it apart no amount of patching up will help - although if you count in that they could ve (and should) turned off its propulsion completely you re right of course. The big conclusion of the battle of Jutland was ultimately that dreadnoughts were difficult to sink by gunfire alone while torpedoes stayed a constant threat no matter how good the protection was. The whole issue here is that the OP reads like a sour BB player ranting against getting sunk by torpedoes - so pointing out that most BBs got sunk by either torpdoes or bombs, not by gunfire was my first reaction.

I take it your grandfather did not serve on either HMS Prince of Whales HMS Triumph HMS Formidable HMS Barham HMS Goliath HMS Majestic HMS Royal Oak Yamato Musashi Fuso Yamashiro Kongo SMS Pommern USS Utha Suffren or Szent Istvan If he had he would probably not have lived to tell such nonsense.

Its really simple - and by now also really old and established online netiquette - if you win you dont open up with a gg. If the defeated party gives you a gg you can reply. If you are the winner and gg the other side first its implied that you mock them. This has nothing to do with trendy being-offended-at-everything. And as several people her already noted, people are not actually offended and being offended at it would be a waste of time. So use the phrase at your own leasure, but dont complain if people think you re either a d*ck or stupid (or at least ignorant) - people can not look into your head, they can only judge you by your actions.

Ja, das kann ich nachvollziehen.

Wenn du auf Realismus setzen willst hätten Flieger während eines Sturms durchgehend die Genauigkeit die sie unter dem Flak-Consumable haben. Fliegen bei Schlechtwetter ist nicht so dolle. (Außerdem hätten alle Geschütze deutlich schlechtere Genauigkeit, Torpedos wären gewiss auch nicht so sicher bei Wellengang... usw, da hängt ein riesen Rattenschwanz dran) So wie es jetzt läuft haben beide Seiten keine Nachteile, andernfalls hätten beide Seiten sehr drastische Nachteile. Aber ich mag Stürme eh nicht.

Was ist denn nun der Konsens? Sterben BBs aus?

Alberner gehts wohl kaum. Na, wann fragt der Erste nach Schland-Camo?

Well if you want to play with ships that simply look like RN ships you can always play Steel Ocean i guess. I do not care which navy is released in which order, as long as they keep to the level of detail/care that i think they put into ships already in the game. Throwing standards out the window is imo not the way to go.

Silent Hunter has been a series of 3d games for a while now (~10 years maybe? Idk.).

I dont know the Silent Hunter series, but did they model all ships with actual armor layouts&compartments? If no, then you dont need more data than what you can find on Wikipedia.