Hopeless_Guppy

I got her down to 12 km with camo, feel naked is I don't have camo, lol

Ok I have just watched Whiskeys gaming lounge vid on this ship and he mentions a 11.5 Km detection range, i have swapped captain skill yet mine is 12,0 I don't get it, followed his advice in the vid yet folk will still see me coming see me from miles off?

Never tried it to be honest, for me it is either full screen or windowed, now I could get way with windowed in WoT's but please I beseech you not to try this in this game as you can surely bet just as you are about to dodge some torps you find yourself in the windows desktop, this has happened to me As we are in the subject of settings and I my try the border less thing, i have noticed that on this account, games are recorded but on my alt they are not, is there some hidden location for recording/disablement of recording etc? Sorry to hijack the thread, humble apologies

So easily obtainable that I will never have a steel ship, lol, I think it should be dropped in crates the same as coal is.

Yes, only tier 10 CV's should see tier 10 games, lol

Well i just had a couple of games in her, was thinking of going the long range guns mod, seems good at stating fires and I admit I was getting frustrated by the AP not seeming to do anything, but usually i alternate between AP and HE anyways, does not feel as comfortable in a way like my beloved Nelson, don't play her that often so she may wel yet have potential to grow on me, one thing I do find really frustrating is the turret traverse and firing angles, make you involuntary show that broadside.

Seems strange to me that they develop something good (supposedly) then just ruin it somehow, what is the logic behind that?

Well I was only partly right, or wrong whichever way you look at it Nine ships of the Royal Navy have been named HMS Conqueror, and another was planned: HMS Conqueror (1745) was an 8-gun fireship captured from the French by HMS Lowestoffe in 1745 and sold in 1748. HMS Conqueror (1758) was a 68-gun third rate launched in 1758 and wrecked in 1760. HMS Conqueror (1773) was a 74-gun third rate launched in 1773 and broken up in 1794. HMS Conqueror (1801) was a 74-gun third rate launched in 1801 and broken up in 1822. HMS Conqueror (1855) was a screw-propelled 101-gun first rate, launched in 1855 and wrecked in 1861. HMS Conqueror was a 120-gun Caledonia-class first rate launched in 1833 as HMS Waterloo. She was rearmed to 89 guns and converted to steam propulsion in 1859, and was renamed Conqueror in 1862. In 1877 she was renamed Warspite and served as a training ship at for the Marine Society. She was burnt in 1918. HMS Conqueror (1881) was a Conqueror-class monitor launched in 1881 and sold in 1907. HMS Conqueror (1911) was an Orion-class battleship launched in 1911 and sold in 1922. HMS Conqueror (1939) was to have been a Lion-class battleship. She was laid down in 1939 but construction was suspended later that year, and she was cancelled entirely in 1945. HMS Conqueror (S48) was a Churchill-class nuclear submarine launched in 1969. The only nuclear submarine ever to sink an enemy warship, she was paid off and laid up in 1990.

The real life Conqueror, is or was a Submarine, not sure if a surface ships shared the same name.

always the fun part, lol

I took a punt and got the £15 bundle, got the Mainz, sadly i am not a cruiser guy but hey you takes your chances and all of that

I play solo in my own clan, (for reasons) but why must people be encouraged to join a clan?

I second this emotion just for the lols make em 12 KM torps too

Now you mention replays, i could not find any of my alt's replays only ones for this account, damn shame that

Played on my alt account and the clan leader had this one, from what I could tell it plays well, but then so does he, also a host of other new ships

Got six kills in my Tirpitz, on my alt account, was a nice game, sadly forgot to screenshot it

This seems to be a missing thing in WoW's, oh sure the one in WoT's gets abused and the most prolific for in game abuse, but would there be any positive of having this ingame, I know many in WoT's, (or did as I have totally removed that game from my system) who loggin just to use the chat system, actually playing a game comes second. Oh and is anyone else having serious game lag tonight?

Yeah sorry i will clarify, port chat is indeed what i meant, in WoT's you don't even have to press battle but can chat to all and sundry, sometimes you even get to have a laugh.

So which is coming first subs or this T4 ship?

In this case the Sinop, just make me feel way more confident, and i do not really know why this is, compare that to the Lenin or the Vladivostok which in all fairness do not, and for some reason, the Soyuz, feels similar to the Sinop where taking the mighty Kremlin out, seems a bit risky, try as I might I simply cannot fathom this out.

While I am generally mulling around somewhere in the game modes, i sometimes get to thinking, (hoping I have not asked this before, otherwise huge egg on my face) in real life, what were, or indeed are the true ranges of weapons, both torpedo and gunnery wise? Just out of interest for all you history buffs or ex navy guys.

Not one, no real intention of doing so either, , how many lines would you have to reset to say get the Stalingrad?

Hius, Toptiers, and so many more, just not able to do it full stop. often I am merely a spotter for the team and maybe do some damage but that it is it.

So why it a tier 4 boat being moved up to tier 10? that is just plain ludicrous.

Just imaging the sadness of releasing all those tinfish, and missing every one of them I do not want this ship, and I am one who like supposedly OP things, same problem with the Asashio, great deep water long range torps, but getting it just right, oh man just don't happen for me.