Jump to content

Miki12345

Players
  • Content Сount

    80
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    9081
  • Clan

    [ADRIA]

3 Followers

About Miki12345

  • Rank
    Leading Rate
  • Insignia

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Croatia

Recent Profile Visitors

351 profile views
  1. Miki12345

    More Dubloons with Sofort (Klarna)

    I think you answered your own question. Doubloons are almost worthless now and have been for some time then again like you said you can just grind anything you need if you have the time. Dubs will only speed up the process. As a free to play player myself I found myself not needing the dubs for anything honestly. I have 6k dubs now just sitting there from various rewards and events. Nothing to spend on unfortunately.
  2. Miki12345

    Gamemode Proposal: Nation vs Nation Team Battles

    While I do like the idea of a Nations vs Nations battle, it really needs more profound thought, design and implementation testing. Think that is why they made PvE operations. Imagine a IJN vs USN where only USN have radar and IJN dont, which might sway the battle to much in USNs favor.
  3. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    Why doesnt it work? A t8 can get into a match with t10 and vice versa. And obviously they are not gonna be balanced when a 1v1 situation happens. Most CVs really shine(too much if you ask me)when they play as top tier.
  4. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    When you ask for help and advice it would be great when that advice would actually work. I replied to that comment and refuted most of his points based on prior experience not that I gave up immidetly rather after the first strike. AA simply doesnt work and it should on an AA ship one would think it does. I know its hefty to read everything posted here but many people counter argued ColonelPete and provided great points. My conclusion from this is that most of the times my Atlanta will struggle to shoot down even a few planes against a single t8 CV. Defeatist attitude is not the issue here, I had an unfun time and I simply snapped, everyone has those days. I wouldnt have such a high WR if I give up on every game I face sth that I dont like. I do not enjoy the new CVs but ppl tend to associate that with defeatist attitude when they see ppl quit playing. Hakuryu can do 25k per drop(and it has like 5+) while that is not one shot it is 50% of a t10 cruisers health(imagine a t8 cruiser which has less), 1 more and poof its gone. Enterprise can do even more citadels even on higher tier ships.
  5. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    Did you forget Enterprise? I saw him get 5 citadels on a DM in a reddit post.
  6. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    They can cap, its just not easy to do so. Lowest alpha but higher average dmg on most tiers. Except AP bombs which still can 1 shot some ships and heavily cripple others. High tier CVs have armored decks which cannot be penned by HE and AP from medium and long range, also to add they dont have regular fires and floods.
  7. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    Did you watch the replay? I am the AA cruiser, Atlanta.
  8. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    Remember when they used to ban cv players that would agree on free farming during rts days? The so called "agreement". Now it is litteraly how cvs work. Ironic.
  9. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    The anti cv folk be4 were the ones that never touched rts cvs be4, were really bad at rts or unicums knowing how OP they are in the right hands.(me included) The thing is AA worked somewhat back then. If you didnt want to get dropped you would get an aa ship and specc it like that. Lastly, the players werent so torn on the cv topics because there were a rare encounter, patch be4 rework counted around 500 cv players and now? Way too many... WG has a plan? Since when? /s
  10. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    I see that this post generated a lot of discussion. Both pro and anti cv, and it made me realize that not only did the rework influence(positively/badly) on the gameplay it also separated the playerbase to somewhat two extremes. If that doesn't indicate that the rework failed to do what is set out to accomplish, i dont know what does.
  11. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    Imagine speccing fully into AA and then not getting a CV in your game or cv doesnt even come close to you. You will have a tougher time dealing with other ships since you do not have those skills that help you against them. It is not impossible to do good even with aa specc but it does hinder you in most situations.
  12. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    I feel your pain. Don't worry, the CV apologists will come here and tell you to L2P. Just dodge. /s
  13. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    Point of yours that doesn't fit the topic nor my question. Presenting another argument to mine that is not connected is a fallacy. This is not about being egocentric it is about making a constructive and cohesive argument.
  14. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    I came in 5th on my team that game... You keep coming to this point but it is not the point of this post.
  15. Miki12345

    Is this how CVs are intended to be "balanced"?

    I really like when WG think of their playerbase as potatoes and completely disregard their feedback, especially the constructive one.
×