plain_average
Players-
Content Сount
143 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
4701 -
Clan
[DCG]
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by plain_average
-
Concealed Maneuvers Smoke Curtain and Minefield
plain_average replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
Mines dropped from CV's are a cancerous mechanic to an already cancerous class. Two CV's with mines on the same team can perma lock down a whole area - and when ships lie still to not die from mines, they get farmed by torps/enemy ships. This is the disgusting mechanis that WG has introduced that will make more people leave the game. The only people that like mines dropped from CV's is the already cancerous CV mains. Disgusting wargaming, just plain disgusting. You should be ashamed of yourself, you just give your player base a BIG [edited]you because you seem to not care at all. Pathetic is what your company is doing to this game -
Concealed Maneuvers Smoke Curtain and Minefield
plain_average replied to The_EURL_Guy's topic in News & Announcements
Wargaming does not care what you like - they only care about money -
Conquest of the mediterranean adventure
plain_average replied to plain_average's topic in General Discussion
I'm having fun in it :-) -
Hi, Anyone else having issues loading the "mission page"? Its pretty annoying when I want to select a new mission and all I get is a
-
I have read the description many times. The only part of the description that mentions 5 - is that you unlock the final reward. It says nothing about having 5 elements as a requirement to get the mission. I mean how hard would it be to write. "You haven't fullfilled the necessary conditions to participate in the offer - you are misssing XX" I have wasted 100k free XP and a bunch of Blue ship boosters+Coal to buy the Hill - all for nothing because wargaming are incapable of writing a text that clearly explains what is required to "Get the mission"
-
This is a scam. The requirements for the missions is nowhere to be found. I have bought the Hill for coal, grinded the missions to get the West Virginia (using boosters) Grinded my Buffalo up to a tier 10 with boosters - and still I cannot get the mission. Can someone from WG please make a clear statement about what the requirements are for being able to accept the mission @YabbaCoe
-
Got all my rewards I think except for the european tokens.
-
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
plain_average replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Game mode allowed me to grind my german BB commander up from 17 -> 21 - with a little help of elite commander XP+FXP. This is my first 21 skill commander, but will get the snowball rolling, since now every single game I play I get 5k+ elite commander XP - so they will come back fast. Best decision I made to spend all my blue commander XP boosters+FXP boosters. Now I have dialed it back to grey/green boosters to get my "stash" back up. -
Public Test - Megathread for rewards & updates
plain_average replied to Crysantos's topic in Public Test
They are probably late as usual. -
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
plain_average replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Only because BB's "spot" for them - otherwise not so much -
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
plain_average replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
best games are those without DD/subs & CV, so you can just relax in your BB and farm ships :-) -
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
plain_average replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
only 275k damage, amateur :-D -
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
plain_average replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
If you dont rush in, you can have really good and profitable battles :-) Even when playing as a non-premium user as myself. -
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
plain_average replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
I think this will be my new game mode to grind XP and credits -
Please allow divisions in assymetric battles - I mean who is getting cheated by divisions? Its no different from normal Co-Op - the bots are slightly less stupid, but its still extremely easy to just kill all without dying. I am sure the BOTS do not care about divisions, and why would other people care if there is a division on the "friendly" team?
-
[POLL] How do you like new Asymmetric Battles ?
plain_average replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
Just a different Co-Op mode where you can actually make pretty good credits - I just dont understand why WG does not allow divisions - I mean who cares? Also it seems like the only class that really works well is BB's - cruisers does not like the new and improved BOTS hit chances -
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
plain_average replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
I know very well what RNG means - but this is a game and games are supposed to be fun. Winning 20% of your games one day, and 80% the other day is not fun. At least not for me. If wargaming had any kind of ranking in the match making, so you met players around your own "rank" - I think it would be much better. As it is today, I can be a super unicum (Which I am not) - and still lose 100% of the games in a day just because of the match making making it impossible to win. One team gets all the >50% WR players with 3k+ games, and the other gets one good player and 11 others with a 40%WR and 50 game average. I am well aware that on average, good players will end up with a win rate > 50% and bad players with a win rate < 50% - but this match making is making me not want to play the game, it is unsatisfactory and unengaging if no matter what I do I will lose or no matter what I do I will win for the flip side. People like to feel in control of their own "destiny" - and with the shitty match maker all you can control is trying to "farm as much XP" as possible when you see that you are about to lose 12-0 - that is a very poor player experience. Its a flaw in all wargamings games, their refusal to do anything that makes random battles less pathetic. The same flaw is in Ranked and brawls - I have seen players with a <45% win rate end up in gold league - this is only possible because of the shitty matchmaker that enables you - if you are lucky - to be carried all they way. -
Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance
plain_average replied to Excavatus's topic in General Discussion
Fun and engaging when the pathetic match maker still refuses to take any kind of stat into consideration, so I end up with a 20% win rate for the day. Needless to say this disgust me, just like wargaming disgust me. It would be so easy to just take a single stat and make the match maker balance based on that. I dont care if its average #battles, PR, Win rate, average XP or some other stat. What we have today is just a joke - and its a joke that WG and the forum trolls just keep hiding behind "random" - random does not have to mean 100% random. I'm happy I am still going "strong" in not spending a single EUR on this game. -
Wargaming is just out of touch with the reality of what players want
- 73 replies
-
- 12
-
-
When Wargarming does not want to create a thread for us - here is one.
-
@YabbaCoe can you please merge this thread with this: I created that because a bug report thread was not created
-
You can use this for now - hopefully WG will sticky the post
-
Me and a division mate was in a game yesterday. Clearly there is a BUG somewhere. A Graphical issue. I was seeing a night time map, he was seeing a daytime map Same battle, just a screen shot taken from two different computers. I was complaining that it was hard to see and he said what are you going on about. First time I have seen this - and I wondered if wargaming had introduced a night time map.
-
Hi, Why has wargaming released two semingly broken CV's at tier 6? Bearn and Ark Royal are just silly. Bearn with its fighers+ broken skip bombers that nuke DD's in easy mode. Same with Ark Royal that have so many bombs in its drops that its possible a single squadron can take out a DD from full health. Why does wargaming release broken crap like this? There is literally nothing you can do as a DD against both these CV's - you can try to dodge all you want, but CV is guaranteed to hit you with 2-4 bombs per drop - and Ark royal can do that 3 times per squadron. Wargaming shame on you for releasing broken crap like this
-
This only works if the Bearn player is BAD - you limit yourself to "broad sides" - but he can still and will still drop two bombs on you directly. Running away from skip bombs are usually better, but again - because Bearn planes drop 2 bombs per plane they drop 4 bombs (2x2) with a very narrow spread - and if CV player knows how to do it properly, its two bombs that hit you. Against Ark Royal, I will try the alternating speed to throw them off - but I doubt it will make a huge difference with the gigantic spread of bombs it drops.
