Jump to content

Kutfroat

Beta Tester
  • Content Сount

    250
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

About Kutfroat

  • Rank
    Chief Petty Officer
  • Insignia

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Kutfroat

    LOL russian cruisers split coming next

    fixed it for you.
  2. Kutfroat

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    there are not that many players. there are not that many games played, and, you now should undertsand "numbers". that 0,0009765625% applies to EVERY player. and just because one game is a win, doesnt increase the chance that you get a 10 loss streak. that chance applies to everey single match played. so no, it´s not me that needs to understand numbers. AGAIN 0,0009765625%...the first "0" is percentage! MM in this game IS NOT RANDOM! and it doesnt need 1000 of players to prove this. everys single one of us is enough. If 1 player has multiple 10+ losing streaks It´s enough to prove that MM is rigged in some way. IT IS MATHEMATICALLY CLOSE TO IMPOSSOIBLE, that 1 single player has multiple 10+ losing streaks, asuming MM is not rigging in any way and swings 50/50 loss. Even if you mare the worst player, you should not run into multiple 10+ losing streaks within a couple of 1000 games. ONCE AGAIN, THAT 0,0009765625% chance doesnt grow if you win a game. I´m not saying it´s impossible to lose 10 games in a row, given MM is random, but multiple 10+ losing streaks, for 1 player within a few 1000 games (sounds much, but again, the chance for a 10 game losing streak is 0,0009765625%, starting with every single game) is CLOSE TO MATHEMATICALLY IMPOSSIBLE, still it happended to multiple people I know... No...MM in this game, just like in WoT, is not random like they claim it to be. It stacks Teams, and mods (I despise them) like MM monitor and XVM prove this. And...why arent there 10+ game win streaks on a regular basis? And no, it´s not becasue I dont remember them...oh boy, how I would remember a 10+ game win streak...
  3. Kutfroat

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    oh pls come on...a 10 time loss streak has a 0,0009765625% chance of happening. THAT IS LITERALLY IMPOSSIBLE, asuming MM is, classes and tiers aside, purely random, but it isnt! still it has happened to me, in this game, multiple times in a below 4k game count. and that is only me. just get lost.
  4. Kutfroat

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    ok, once again...for all you fanboys...MM in this game is anything but random, deal with it. the chances to lose 10 games in a row, asuming MM is not rigged, is 0,5^10. that´s close to winning the lottery! it´s almost more likely a meteor hit´s the earth than to lose 10 games in a row, still it has happended to me, you, friends of mine, multiple times. so, now think for yourself, remember for yourself, how many times did you "win" the lottery in this game? i for myself got multiple 10 game loss-streaks, cant count the amounts of 5+ loss streaks, which should still - asuming a purely 50/50 random, not rigged MM - only acure 0,5^5 times, still...close to impossible.
  5. Kutfroat

    WG pls buff Kremlin!

    Pls, why did you have to destroy this perfectly balansed ship? It's literally unplayable now, especially in randoms where chances are high to have a CV in every other game! I mean, what strongpoints are now left, after the introduction of this crippling weakness ( the AA hitpoint nerf)? It only got totally OP armor left with almost, but only almost - IFHE Hindenburg I'm looking at you (nerf her base HE pen !) - HE spam invulnerability. It only takes unlucky citadells when perfectly broadsiding, from up close. Only second best torpedobelt at T10. OP ruddershift of almost cruiserlevel, but again only almost! Best AP penetration even dumping 64mm higher caliber Yamato shells. Very good accuracy at 15+ km and retartedly good accuracy below...which I would rather rate as a weakness, because actually at long range some shots might get missen. So why should now someone take this PoS over and other T10 BB? I mean, why did you have to utterly destroy this ship by nerfing it into the ground, when on the other hand you only make small and sensible adjustments with Henry IV and Kleber, which are clearly still retartedly overpowered!? Makes no sense? Just glad I dont have any of these ships...
  6. Kutfroat

    Huge DD nerf might be coming for patch 0.9.1

    I'm waiting for it since page 2.
  7. Kutfroat

    There will never be a BB with bigger guns then Yamato...

    i really like nr. 4 and 9!
  8. Kutfroat

    There will never be a BB with bigger guns then Yamato...

    that's easy..."just dodge"! we dd players get it told since rework, we just dont get the concept, but our dodging-times will come...
  9. Kutfroat

    There will never be a BB with bigger guns then Yamato...

    make it 4x4 of them with smolensk rpm! but the missile is too much, keep it serious, pls.
  10. Kutfroat

    There will never be a BB with bigger guns then Yamato...

    better...get 666 "base captured" ribbons in yamato.
  11. Kutfroat

    Huge DD nerf might be coming for patch 0.9.1

    the message to dd players is clear: you want to hit something with torps in the future? here we present you a NEW dd line with undodgeable fast torps - by coincidence the detection of them is 1.8km I think, so the module does not nerf them, except by lowering their allready pittyful damage by another 5%. so the dd future is...hit nothing with slow af high damage torps, or use undodgeable fast torps with neglectible damage. torp hit rate with "old" dd's will most likely fall below the 1-2% mark, and even if the majority would switch and grind the new dd's, overall torp damage will still drop, because of the low damage. so the reason behind this nerf is, that bb's would suffer "too much" - in WG's view - from the upcoming fast torpedoes, because suddenly, in addition to the occasional "regular" torp hits, the fast needles would suddenly lead to more floodings(-damage and kills) and bb's suddenly, again, can no longer shrug off and ignore flooding damage, which was the intention behind the flooding nerf.
  12. Kutfroat

    Whats a Good way to Play Alsace ^^

    he allready is at t9, allready skipped t8, so nothing changes. i was only pointing out, that the JB is simply better in every way than the Alsace...but that's true for almost all (silver) t9 battleships and cruisers, they are bad ships, especially compared to the t9 premiums. if we would talk about dd's...well, t9 has the best ones (fletcher, kitakaze, mogador, jutland).
  13. Kutfroat

    Whats a Good way to Play Alsace ^^

    Sell it and get Jean Bart instead, that's how to play her...
  14. Kutfroat

    Matchmaker Discussion Thread & MM Balance

    Say what you want WeeGee.. this f.cking matchmakin is anything, but "fair" random...so, just in WoT, your mm-algorythm makes me quit spending money. good job. "really slow motion clap". 💪
  15. ...is the except same bullcrap as the initial idea, that caused an enormous shitstorm, because of course this modules will get reworked to be mandatory to force people into NTC to sell this "grind booster bundles" WG has a hard on for selling. do this guys really think their playerbase is that stupid to not be able to think 2 steps ahead, or do they just dont care to spit into their customers faces...again? or do they think with the current ongoing puerto rico shitstorm, they can sneak this in unnoticed? WG, this is NTC v1 all over again, that your community told you what to do with, and this message didnt change. so bury the idea of forcing people to regrind their allready obtained T10 ships. we wont do it, because we dont want to. we will most likely just stop playing and move on...I did it with WoT, and if you push it to far with WoWs, I - and probably many others - will do it with this game.
×