mtm78

Ow please just drop it ok. Sharana is one of the people who you bunch can't dismiss that easily since he does play a lot of CV and yet you still argue against anything which would make your broken toys less broken. Sad.

Did you read the Asia portal announcement?

You don't say... Toxic people like that, especially when threatened with changes to their broken toys, are really sad. We should feel sorry for them and their family, it must be hard for them as well.

I purposely didn't say OP as that wouldn't be true, they are broken and yes mostly because of the to big gaps between tiers, missing ships in the tree, MM creating unbalanced setups. If all that is changed it would look different I am sure. I will still not like the ability of good CV players to shotgun anything they like ( and don't tell me this isn't true, it is and it's been proven and confirmed by good cv players themselves ) and I do hope this is somehow changed in a way which makes it less probable while not making it to hard for bad/average cv players to be still effective somewhat. I also hoped the CV meta would focus less on damage whoring and more on AA superiority and recon, but alas we can't have it all

Asia portal mentions weeks as a time scale, EU portal 'in the clouds'. So EU want's to lure some more people into CBT and Asia portal is just stating the facts ;)

Liar. People been stating facts the whole time, and all you cv whores been doing is dismissing it because you don't want your broken toys changed.

Ps. don't think testing how to play bad is actually the reason of beta

Selective reading much? Not going to waste my time any more then I have done so already, good luck and have a nice day

Aha, so (2) is what (1) looks like? How does it look like when you do jump on people, is calling people stupid a normal thing for you? Are you that smart/good? Or do you like playing in divisions with equally good players exploiting game mechanics and stomping on us plebs? I got 2 games in a CV and I will say again CV gameplay is broken period. You can say what ever you want, but it doesn't change the fact that the action from dev's are showing I am right in my comment.

Looking at your stats you're a bad player, but you have a high relative hit ratio, so the lead assist question is a legit one. And ST brown nosing to WG to keep ST status? You really need to get out more, if you payed attention there are plenty of vocal super testers who been criticizing certain aspects of gameplay during certain stages.

They would sell more Bismarck as premium ship then Tirpitz ( even while Tirpitz should be the better ships due to final refit ).

Stop it. You keep trying to make CV's look weak with anecdotal evidence which is rebuked by the numbers the dev have access to. It's quickly making you look like a cry baby who is upset because mommy takes his favourite toy away.

Which shows what? Working as intended?

To bad you didn't even reach that far so we can't compare

Your only good stats damage wise are on IJN carriers... game, set match?

WG is listening, the question is, to whom

I want Bismarck as reward ship, if we all riot enough we will get it for sure

Try to be in a battleship, if a USN CA is nice enough to help with AAA you are lucky as their best interest ( experience ) is NOT with shooting down planes. And even then, the carrier will sacrifice a wing to trigger the active skill and then comes in with the rest while it's on cool down. You're not a good player, but you got reasonable average damage for ONE reason only: you play mostly carriers. Game, set, match thank you sir!

I can't choose... or...

Yes, because one or two cv's sinking ships without hard counter are fun for the other players in the match, right?

Read the post above you ( though my wallet is ready for Bismarck ).

If it does I missed it completely Sorry for the confusion. Edit: since I'm really not that crazy, they might have edited it after I posted/read it ;)

No no don't get me wrong I'm happy either way but there been talk about captain xp before and maybe they didn't say something in the announcement because they aren't sure about it yet I think the community up till now has been great, a breath of fresh air compared to another WG title. Let's hope OBT doesn't corrupt it to much

Can you explain the differences between asia portal announcement ( weeks / 'in the mist' ), tier 4 us bb and 2 captains with free skills depending on participation in cbt / tier 4 us bb? It looks like EU community is being shafted once again, pardon my french

http://worldofwarships.asia/en/news/common/closed-beta-accounts-to-be-wiped-soon-reward-to-follow/ Links seems to suggest it's close for asia server at least Anyone got some light to shed on it for EU? Btw, imo it's not ready for obt, fix the cv trees first and give torpedo mongers cv's something more to do then being damage mongers. Also please note the info about the captain skills on the asia server, yet no mention on the EU server, discuss edit: 'spelling'