mtm78

1. Stop posting cut off screenshots and link to the account. 2. You're a bad player in all your other classes and only have decent stats in your CV's so no you're not a 70% player. But without CV's you wouldn't even be a 50% player ( last time I checked your account you had < 50% on all other classes ).

This is the issue for you, clearly. And this is what you use for propaganda, because it's more 'social'. Well to bad, I would agree with not liking to depend on randoms without any indication of skill available in game. I however strongly agree with and enjoy playing the team aspect of this game. It is why I can get a decent WR which is higher then my avg. damage would correlate to if this was a pure damage based game. Coordination and situational awareness are so much more important in this game then in WoT, and so much more rewarding to have. Also, blobs of 3 - 4 ships should be able to counter any CV ( proper tier ships ) mitigating most of its offensive power. So if you don't want to rely on randoms too much, don't play without 3 man division. 2 CA's and a BB, or 2 BB's and a CA who use coordination are a force to be reckoned with.

- Activation time for AAA ability? No thanks, it's hard enough already to time the ability at the exact right time when a carrier can no longer abort his attack. - Buff dds spottability from the air of 20% -> I hope you mean NERF and not buff, I don't want DD's spotted sooner than they are already. The rest I don't have any counter arguments against, especially since your changes to mobility for instance are seemingly all interlocked.

No, whining needs to be removed, preferably completely. Objectives, reach them or draw, not a hard concept. And without that ability, DD's are even less attractive to play at higher tiers. Btw, it wasn't discussed, you just complained about said that everyone who draws out a game to prevent a loss is a coward and is spoiling the fun of the enemy team. You seemed to think that attacking a numerical superior force is 'honorable' instead of stupid. Your call not mine, I hope you feel the same when you're the only DD alive on your team and my 3 CA division is looking for you. Don't be a fun spoiling coward, come fite us

Did you check paths.xml? Seems the installer is borking out a lot with that so that might be it. Btw Aslain I'm glad EoS has been made inoperable it was to close to giving mod users a free 100% active time consumable ( spotter plane )

I am pretty sure it won't be, but let's call it hope?

How can normal people read that crap? Ow wait, they might be Republican's themselves ( no politics you silly Martian, just get back in your saucer X-2 and fly away far far away )

Yes, a source would be nice, would make it credible and so on

Blame Jingles...

Atm sample size is statistically irrelevant, but the known numbers are quite clear on how avg cv is performing. I played 1400 games in CBT, I had Yammy, Des Moines, Zao and Fletcher I got plenty of top tier experience thank you, probably even more than you? edit: looking at your stats I finally get it, you're playing carriers to boost your otherwise terrible stats on other classes?

Picking some account with terrible stats to try and make CV's less overperforming ( xp wise ) isn't making it look like you're cherry picking at all, no sir

You sir, deserve a couple of compliments from the people in that game Really, it is the way to make the game more fun for everyone, have a +1.

Don't you guys forget ->

Who you calling bob bob But I agree I think it sucks when I tunnel vision and not get a victory because I want to sink that last enemy ship instead of cap. edit: just that suggestion about giving victory bonus to top 3 players in a draw is bad, it would only lead to more draws.

I would play for a draw then much more often than now, since I would be more certain to get victory condition rewards when I draw then if I try to secure a victory.

I am bad at not wondering at all, I even check detailed results screen to check my hit ratio and damage's after most games. It's still fun though, you just have to have somehow realistic expectations on how you perform. I won't beat the best of the best statwhores but I don't want to either, as long as I'm doing well compared to how I feel I should, it's enough for me. Even people who don't use the numbers to verify their performance will reflect back on a match and use more subjective means to validate themselves ( eg I didn't sink that enemy bb but I came 'this' close! ). And again if that's enough it's enough. Fun is subjective, relative to one's expectations. I can lose games and have fun if I know I played my best and gave them a good fight.

Falls in line nicely with the 'leaked' part right

Fun is THE most important stat of all, sadly finding a correct formula to calculate it is not trivial

Search for leaked/crawled asia server stats, it's posted on this forum more than once ( sorry can't find one right now and I g2g walk the dog ).

No, not at all. But if I am up against 5 enemy ships in my DD and I got 14hp left, it's no longer a question of 'can I win?'. The question then becomes, 'can they win?' and that's just as much a victory for me if they can't win as if I were up against 2 ships and managed to sink them.

Sadly the available statistics don't agree with that. The crawled stats showed higher cv dmg and xp across the boards/tiers, with the biggest gaps being in the mid tier IJN strike setups. But even on tier X this still exists.

Thanks for the link, I <3 the site so thank you very much! Sadly I can't work on my hitlog as long as I don't have python access ( working on that as well though ). Again, thanks for letting us all know! edit: Darn the site is broken, stop hammering it you dirty stat whores!!

Not to mention he isn't even playing them that well imo