Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. Spread will get narrower the longer they are in the water. edit: ninja'd
  2. mtm78

    Reported for playing poorly?

    http://worldofwarships.eu/en/community/accounts/525151639-/#tab=pvp/account-tab-overview-pvp LIAR
  3. My sarcasm detector is beeping, should I replace the battery?
  4. I also own both, and Murmansk makes me considerably more credits so far ( I do play her more so I'm more used to her, which would explain some of the difference in performance ). Nice to know we got people from all ages playing
  5. Well maybe if the quote would be correct... 1. Income isn't much higher, but repair costs are much lower. 2. They help you speed up training because all xp you earn in a battle is shared with ship and captain, and you can use the captain with full skills while retraining when you use a premium ship. 3. You earn free xp each battle. MrConway posted a screenshot from one of his first Tirpitz games, he made ONE MILLION credits with one game.. ofc, some skill and luck are required for that.
  6. mtm78

    Reported for playing poorly?

    Bye, don't let the door hit your behind on your way out *\o/*
  7. ulthien, you have 16k avg damage on your Omaha which is terrible, but if you had Murmansk you would pay less for when you lose the game and your ship get's sunk ( since you only survived ONE of your 30 battles in Omaha ). Will you please stop posting your facts about how ships perform, you might confuse the people who don't know how things work and come here to ask people who do for some help/advice.
  8. mtm78

    Confused ....

    No they do not.
  9. mtm78

    black screen

    https://eu.wargaming.net/support/?utm_source=global-nav&utm_medium=link&utm_campaign=wows-forum Make sure you're logged in and make a ticket with support. Include a DirectX output file.
  10. Lol I didn't find it that easy and you really took me out of the match a couple of times when I wanted to launch but couldn't because I saw those planes coming to a vector I didn't trust you with
  11. mtm78

    [Edited]

    He outperforms me in damage on the Phoenix, guess you have a point ;) He should division some more to get his wr up, and sorry wr isn't just luck or mm not even on low tiers ( it is with low sample size ofc ). And he should have a press account, fully agree as I to would like his content to cover all available ships and he indeed doesn't have enough free time to grind the ships himself.
  12. mtm78

    The single biggest problem with this game.

    +1 Bad is in the eye of the beholder, but it certainly would appeal to a smaller target audience.
  13. mtm78

    [Edited]

    Sometimes I don't actually load slow, it's just that the poo is slowly coming out and the queue was shorter than expected ^ best excuse from an afk leecher ever
  14. mtm78

    [Edited]

    36 here. I actually don't think Jingles appeals to the younger audience more than the more adult, even if during the last year his performance has shifted a bit to also appeal more there ( at the cost I dare to say of the existing viewer base a bit ).
  15. mtm78

    What's up with Wargaming

    New people only leave if good players don't take some responsibility and try to be helpful in chat during a game and help new players just as much as try to sink them. Then again, if you dare play a low tier DD as an 'experienced' player, you're suddenly a seal clubber instead of doing community service in teaching the new players about fresh fish and sailing in straight lines
  16. mtm78

    The single biggest problem with this game.

    Don't try to repair heavy damage then, you've been playing longer than me, you must have some indication on what sound heavy damage makes compared to light/medium damage. Ofc I won't deny the UI could be clearer in indicating how much hp would be repairable by triggering the repair!
  17. mtm78

    The single biggest problem with this game.

    And yet BB's have second highest damage after carriers, even with all the 'imbalanced fire damage' mentions in posts and threads. If you want HE fire damage lowered, are you prepared for CA's to have an AP buff so they will do considerable damage to your superstructure head on or angled?
  18. mtm78

    The single biggest problem with this game.

    So there is no RNG in the damage roll of a torpedo ;) BB's which would be more accurate would get to high average damages, like I said with current dispersion they already have the highest damage next to carriers so it's hard to argue for a buff in accuracy. Close range dispersion has just been given a big buff, and secondaries are meant to be as they are. More accurate secondaries would make DD's even worse than they are now, they were more accurate in the past and they been rebalanced because they were broken. Coming into secondary range with USN DD's is mandatory in many cases to launch torpedo's, there is no way this by design should be a 100% suicide run, think about it.
  19. mtm78

    high ping, unplayable

    I did not even play yesterday but I have been active on forum and it was indeed timing out and lagging, and I'm 20km from AMS-IX.
  20. mtm78

    The single biggest problem with this game.

    Well that is one of the bigger reasons I play DD and CA/CL and not really anything else. I feel more in control, the shell patterns are tighter. But, if you gave BB the same dispersion as CA they would be totally broken/overpowered. So, either deal with the bigger influence of RNGezus/dispersion ( which btw still allows BB's to be second in damage after carriers ) or play other classes. Not that torp's aren't a big RNGezus/gamble, a single course change will mess up your perfect broadside spread, but the guns on DD's / CA/CL's do make me feel more in control. Again, I don't like playing battleships at the moment but there is nothing inherently wrong with them either. It's just personal preference, and I'm pretty sure I will someday have H41 in my port ( or Montana/Yamato ).
  21. mtm78

    [Edited]

    They might not be that bad, rather average in some regards ( let's leave his terribad wr out of it as the sample size is too small ), but they are bad enough to keep me convinced he is gloating at everyone saying he is a 'baddie', while his other eye is glancing over his alt-account with 60% wr and decent k/d, damage, def/cap and so on Come on, after all the video's of him pointing out how having 'Jingles' written in big letters above your ship isn't doing much for having enjoyable games ( seeing how enemy team just suicides to try and kill ze Jingles ), you still don't think he has an alt-account?
  22. mtm78

    New Aim Mod (No, realy, this one is new)

    The problem isn't knowing, the problem is the doubt itself
  23. Even Sharana couldn't always sink me, and he said he did his best. CV is not auto kill, granted I was in a quite nimble DD and my moving with the planes on the minimap took me out of the game for those 3 attacks he tried to launch on me but the same can be said from the carrier and trading a single DD firepower with a CV firepower wise is not a bad trade. In short: don't just say you can avoid torpedo's when you know how to use wasd, say it when you're actively scanning minimap for planes and start moving in time..
  24. mtm78

    [Edited]

    I guess he is more concerned about other breaking fictional rules then himself braking actual one's.
×