mtm78

I've spend more money on f2p games then on games I need to buy ( and I have to admit, that's also because of the last one's I sometimes download illegal copies on tpb ). Free2Pay is a better name if you ask me

Damnit sorry I missed your post, now I feel bad for stealing your ( old ) joke

Huh, I don't want to be judgemental but why you telling us all you like World Of Warcraft so much, this isn't a Blizzard forum you know

Sorry didn't have time to seriously look at it, but I do have the repository saved ( thanks for that, now to actually port it ). I'm expecting some news on this front this week, if I'm done I'll post a thread in Fan Section and pm you a link

I can live with muting, I will pick up messages through chat almost always, and if I'm to busy to pick up a chat message, any audio message would just piss me off since it distracts me. But that's personal, I am a bad multi-tasker ;)

If you need to add a troll face to a reply to the 'issue' you bring up in OP, I believe this thread is ready for the junkyard ( add troll face here ).

Sorry for the wrong context posting Solo win rate means as much as you think a single person has influence on a strain of matches, even if you do think it matters ( like me, still ) it doesn't mean it applies to a singular game in any meaningful way. For instance in that match I probably had hoped to kite the enemy advance long enough for our lemming train to push the other flank. Which works quite often, but not always.

It's from the minimap + damage counter mod iirc, doesn't really bother me but it's not looking better then vanilla so idk why they changed those visuals.

Did I hurt your feelings? 20/10 on fiber is incredibly unlikely, certainly here, period. Fiber is more expensive to lay down, it is stupid to offer people slower speed than cable/copper after investing that much money ( since you need to earn back the money you spend, and fiber is way more expensive ). Sorry for the technicalities, I hope reading this didn't hurt your brains to much, absorbing new info must be hard for them.

Murmansk and Kongo's galore

20/10 Fibre... copper can do 20/10, strange to have a fiber connection that incredibly slow..

I know Sharana did a nice writeup about fire damage and flooding damage, I just can't think of in which thread it was..

I gave up yesterday after three losses in a row. Mogami -> played mediocre / baddish = lost. Murmansk -> played okish = lost, Murmansk -> played badish = lost. Thing is, even in those bad games I was still on top of team in xp, and that was why I gave up. If I play that crap and still do more than anyone else in the team, it's just not a good day to play imo. Well that, and I already was tired as heck.

While I also keep certain ships ( Take Myoko for instance ) I usually move the captain to the higher tier ship ( say Mogami ). Because I can't imagine playing high tier games with crap captains against the vast majority which does have highly skilled captains. It is also why I have an Atago/Yubari/Gremmy/Murmansk/Sims, I use those for all games where a captain is retraining, since in a premium ship the captain will always be able to use full skills even while retraining.

We will not get a WT like armor model in the harbor. They will add armor models to the wiki pages.

I haven't voted because thread is still redundant, nothing new to vote on and repeating already asked questions/proposals/thoughts is not making them get implemented any sooner ( or later ).

You had the same thing with WoT, you could sell a tank by clicking two buttons. Now you got to type in the exact amount of silver you're receiving when you sell it. People could read while clicking two buttons, yet we still got another check. Since you can buy back tanks you sell, but never get back your commander, a popup warning would be very much in place.

Funny, I had way more AFK players when I was using the GER/RU test account ( WoWs_Testdrive_xxx ) then I ever had with my normal account. Pretty certain people went afk because they thought I was press and they were effectively one ship down from the start ( which sadly we were, but not because of me ). Anyway I report them as bot, plays poorly doesn't fit because playing poorly still indicates playing/taking action of some kind.

Lmao are you a moron who can't read the thread and notice there is no proper warning in place like a popup informing you the reserve is full and the command will be dismissed? The small icon which shows that is just not enough. You can be a tool and think it's fine as it is, but if that's the case we wouldn't have popups in WoT where you need to confirm the exact amount you're selling a tank for. Same principle, but maybe that goes over your head, considering how much of a tool you are.

I see Mister_Greek has been to this poll, he voted the last option. On topic, being a carrier nub and all, everyone I know who does play them goes for air superiority. As Sharana said, it's a no-brainer.

This is true, but I will still hate you for it during a game where I would rely on my USN DD's to attack IJN DD's instead of sometimes being even behind my cruiser trying to get gun damage. Or better, as it's not in any way personal, I would hate that particular DD captain, as well as WG for not rewarding important team play aspects ( CA's getting more XP for shooting down planes and preventing damage to their BB's, DD's for initial spotting ). Note I said initial since most engagements that is the only thing you'll see as after their first shot most ships would stay visible during the entire engagement.

Because aesthetically it's more pleasing then ships coming to a death stop due to an invisible wall?

I am aware of this, it is why I am a bit vexed atm. Hopefully the situation is remedied soon.

Or that

He has 295 games and 109 kills, he even has positive 'other' kills. For those not knowing it, team kills are deducted from other kills ( flooding/ramming/fire ). If you don't do any of those kills but you do team kills you will get a negative value there. This player is apparently just bad, and not a deliberate team killer.