mtm78

Signed up... now to buy that prem polish DD

I've seen carriers in division with a good AAA BB and the BB saying at the start of a match 'I'll protect the carrier!'. So sad there isn't a facepalm emote on this forum yet

Read this page on the support portal -> https://eu.wargaming.net/support/kb/articles/49 Please make a ticket with support and submit the requested files to troubleshoot your connectivity issues. Alternatively/also, you can attach them to your post and perhaps people from here are able to help when we get the requested data.

Now that's harsh True though, nothing changed you can still buy all premium consumables with silver. The poll results are rather surprising, if you're not running to top tier ships right away the economy isn't that hash to disallow the use of more premium consumables. Damage control party is almost a must due to HE/fire spam even against CA's. Damage repair party on a BB imo makes a lot of sense, and it's 22500 credits which is less than you're likely to pay for a flat service fee for entering the battle! Smoke gen makes perfect sense on USN DD's which have to rely on smokescreens or islands to launch torps ( except top tier ). Defensive AA if you're in a division as CA with a BB or CV, it's almost certain you will be able to take advantage off the shorter cooldown. So, either the people who voted are a> bad players who don't generate enough income to support any consumables really , b> players which run standard accounts and are grinding to high tier ships as quickly as possible, c> players which feel premium consumable is 'cheating' ( no really, I know people who see it as an unfair advantage because poor people/players might not be able to use them ), d> a combination of the above in varying degrees. Now, this group is still not as large to warrant these poll results, so there must be a large group which I'm missing? Which one, idk, maybe you guys can tell me?

Which is why I asked about it, I don't have an NA account ( yet at least ).

The matter you read it doesn't concern me, it wasn't a personal attack is was a response on your correction on how you should play battleships ( making statements like pushing in is stupid because secondaries suck, when beercrazy was pointing out sniping bb's are the species with the least functional brain cells in the game ). Please refrain from making broad accusations regarding my intent, if it's unclear maybe ask for clarification before jumping the gun.

WarshipsToday, yes I meant a distribution graph

BB's rock at higher tiers though, it's only low tier BB's which are comparably weaker. GL with your carriers, see you on the high seas

Last two days I been a super unicum -> http://warships.today/player/501112274/eu/mtm78 Overall, 'great' player. Seriously guys, you need to fix that thing after all Garbad himself called me an everlasting baddie in whatever games I might play ( well ok he didn't, he just said I would never be gud in Tonks and he kind of has a point ). A suggestion -> Top players for European server by Warships Today Rating for All battles; make this more then just one page with top 100, I want to be able to see where people are on the list. I also want to see the demographics when applying your performance measuring formula on the wows population?

Imo pressing battle without propulsion equipment -> shorter game than otherwise. I loose engines on all of them, a lot. Like in every salvo or something. Rudder is fine, not worse than other DD's, but the engine seems to me to have less module hp than other DD's. Russian trait so to say?

This isn't a bad community, it's not the WoT forums you came from As to your 'issue', BB's are prime target for the enemy team, being shot at is kind of the job description ( or it should be ). If you want to get shot at less, play IJN DD's and ninja torp. If you do it right, you won't get shot at the whole match ( because they won't ever see you ;) ).

Why fear PvP? We won't bite! Come play with us, PvP is more challenging but also more rewarding imo. And if you're fearing playing PvP because you're considering yourself a bad player, how about trying to improve? Not for 'them', but for you to feel comfortable with playing whatever you want, be it PvE or PvP, and not having to worry about your skillset not being on par. DD's are one of the most fun classes, they are also the most specialized per nation. Low tier ( especially ) IJN DD's are ninja torp spammers, USN DD's hunt IJN DD's and SN DD's hunt them both ( though USN DD's can fight off SN DD's ). Pick something you like, and look around for some guides on how to play that style most effective.

Why torture everyone with low tier BB's, give them glorious Colorado instead ( or Mikasa's ).

True, that is one of the only things it can do, shoot and move. Not think about tactical decision and all. Especially in a DD, PvE isn't representative of the real game, it's a place to practise gunnery skills before you move on to fighting other players. edit: ps SN = Sovjet Navy, so SN DD mean Russian DD.

Mikasa is a turd with too few shells with too high dispersion, I can't imagine anyone performing consistently with her.

I don't count PvE.

Training room, both in Montana's? ps I looked his bb performance up it was all +-50% at best compared with beercrazy's high 50's to 60%.

You played 25 games in DD's, isn't it to early to complain about them? The module damage is per design, I wouldn't touch a SN DD's without equipment to save my propulsion as I know it won't survive some enemy sailor spitting in it's general direction. Low tier DD's ( with exceptions ) are mostly pretty powerful at the least. Don't want to talk about high tier DD's with you, you only got a Clemson.

Auto fire ability back? There never been an auto fire ability for primary guns ( that I know off ).. And it would remove one of the most skill demanding aspects, and as such would have to be nerved to the ground ( say I get 30% hit ratio manually aiming, it would be fair if you hit 1% with your auto aim since you're not putting in any effort for it ). So no, auto aim = bad idea. Then you mini bino's, I seen games which have them and you might think it makes sense but the scaling required would make it useless ( you can't properly lead any moving targets ). Dual nope, for when one just doesn't cut it.

Look at beercrazy's performance in his BB's, and then look at yours. Then, decide to not put your opinion over his, he clearly knows better than you. Instead, try to improve to the point where you can understand beercrazy's input beter, and try to adapt to his teachings

It sux when their not on the enemy team

I just lost a domination game, around 3/4 into the game I died ( clevelol, 2 kills only 53k dmg ) so I started looking at our battleships. We had more ships but less caps, but all our bb's where camping so hard we lost. I told the full hp Nagato that playing bb as sniper is bad, he said I should 'die early' and couldn't torture his brain into a more compelling argument for his abysmal performance, simply because there is no excuse to be such a cave dwelling neandertaler unless you were born with less brain cells then an amoeba which as we all know isn't possible because that is a single cell organism. And yet, this Nagato captain displays the ability to perfectly mimic the behavior of said hypothetical mythical creature without brain cells, by continuously sniping while we lose the match because he didn't get any functioning brain cells at birth.

My solo wr has dropped 2% by playing SN DD's the last couple of days to 56, my division wr has gone up 1% to 64% ( haven't played RU DD's in division ). Division with people who know what their doing greatly enhances win chance.

Omaha C hull is now the same as Murmansk in gun range.

The problem is not in ability to deal damage over time, they do that quite well. The issue is that the dmg is spread out a lot and isn't as influential in battle. You deal damage but you depend more on your team. I don't have that much less dmg then you yet I had like 32% wr.