mtm78

No, it's still 'coming', just not 'soon' anymore. I wish we had unified gold, would make me buy that Imperator Nicolai I bundle instead of boycotting it.

You appeared biased, since you have this profound opinion yet seem to not posses sufficient knowledge about the game nor how statistics should be interpreted. I'm more then willing to listen to your arguments, I'm however not expecting much to counteract what already has been pointed out. You didn't seem so humble when you claimed: If you make that claim next time, don't do it in the same post as where you're showing you're using patch notes ( and misinterpreting them to boot ) to base your 'arguments' on. edit: Greg is good, but Minekaze is a better DD ( in it's role as BB killer, Greg is a better DD hunter obviously ). Murmansk has good stats but it's now the same as Omaha. You can not use stats which predate an important change to the ships ( C hull now has same range as Murmansk ). Greg btw was pre-order, off course it should show good stats, everyone who has one should be playing longer on average compared to other ships. SN DD's are lackluster, some are performing ok some are underperforming. Imperator Nicolai I is a good strong ship, but it's not as unbalanced as stats might show because again people buying it initially are not the scrubs which cause lower average. If I would get one and get >70% win rate and 45k dmg at least, is it a sign of a semi competent player ( especially at tier IV ) or is the ship overpowered? If you think it's the ship, what does that mean for Arkansas Beta, in which I get those same results and which is widely considered not a good BB?

I hope it has more compelling 'arguments' then the 'buff' to Murmansk...

Confusing thread title is confusing Anyway, no, you can't shoot torpedo's, it would be highly unrealistic if you could as no ship in real life was able to defend himself against torpedo's by shooting at them.

He still should be able to find his own way no

Typical GE player, thinking GE CA's are terribly weak and SN DD's are incredibly strong. -1 if I had one left.

http://gamemodels3d.com/worldofwarships/vehicles/prsb001 Take a look, port stats are deceiving Note the citadel location and the sloped inner deck/armoring.

You just demonstrated you don't know what you're talking about. Murmansk wasn't 'equally buffed', Omaha C hull got the same range Murmansk always had.

Most people consider Arkansas Beta a bad tier IV BB I'm not a good BB captain, in Tirpitz I had much worse results ( and Tirpitz is a stronger tier 8 then AB is a tier 4 ). It's the opposition which skews it, lots more newer players involved at tier 4 then tier 8. Yes that means on your team as well, but that's good it allows you to carry more. edit: btw I am not saying Imperator Nikolai I isn't better then Arkansas Beta, imo it is because of the turret configuration and armor model.

Ships should be balanced themselves, not balanced by 'rarity' due to economics. What you are calling balance, is actually pay-to-win ( if IN I is really OP ).

If WG is coming to guarantee me I can buy this ship in a month for 11e without the bundle it will be cool with me.... But looking at the store, I'm not that hopeful. And don't tell me to wait for another ship, I want this one, just the ship o7

https://github.com/Aerroon/WoWSNamesFromReplays

Look, if the game was that buggy this forum would be full of threads like yours, but it isn't. Which points us to the impression it's your local system. How about running that dxdiag I linked earlier and posting that here?

edit: Thought, there already is a 'generic' thread in GD which per title is about the premium store bundles so I think it makes sense to use that for this discussion

The day isn't over, there is still time for them accredit the prices according to the info in OP ( but they are cutting it close I admit ).

I am just saying, there are lots of people around with opinions, willing to share them and portray them as true, while a simple glance at a profile would show people to ignore said opinion. You did touch on the vulnerability against torpedoes which I can only agree with so I'm not accusing you of false info at all, I just want to have clear where your info is coming from ;)

Got a replay, I am curious Nice game!

Look there is AP angle normalization which occurs before the autobounce check. This normalisation has RNG in it, thus RNG influences the damage output of AP shells. So this is wrong.... And this is wrong as well, leading to the first being wrong off course. The RNG happens regardless of you hitting the same spot at the same angle, it's just by far not as influential as the +-25% penetration and +-25% damage you have in World Of Tanks. edit: reading this back, I'm actually not sure if the angle normalisation is done prior or after auto bounce check.

There 100% is rng involved in angle normalisation, it's in the q&a's but god forbid you actually having any real contextual knowledge about it.

You see, with all these reports about imbalanced performance on the live servers, I'm starting to get afraid the bundle might not last as long as it's advertised. My bday is in six days, maybe someone will gift it to me

If you're 30 seconds on the border and there are enemies in range, you should be dead already so taking away armaments shouldn't be needed at that point.

I love people who post here but have no battles on their account, yet comment on ships and gameplay without offering us a chance to point out he is either probably right of full of crap. Can you link your profile so we can see how well you're actually are at the game, so we know how much 'value' we need to put on your 'ideas'? Edit: and I'm happy it has less equipment slots then AB, I still haven't bought the reduced visibility module nor the 3 million gun option nor the 2 million damage control II

Damnit damnit it's so tempting.... stop telling how stronk she is ( not that I didn't know already )