mtm78

Don't post this in off-topic, since your issues relate to the current update I would use this forum section -> http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/forum/451-current-update/ Also, on top of this page is a link to support, go to the support page log in and make a ticket for your problem so both forum and support is aware of your issue ( best bet of finding a cause/solution ).

I shouldn't even have posted that, I don't want to distract from the real issue at hand

I always complain if the clowns are all on the enemy team, since they will die too fast to my fast CA's and DD's before my slow BB's can even get into proper range

21k? Funny this week I seen > 30k logged in. Stop using wrong statistics ;) edit: sorry for OT

I had a -1 to spare and gave it to you, just because I want to conform to forum mentality and you seem to be the one on the receiving end

Uhm at that time everyone was under the impression RU didn't get Black Friday special either. Black Friday is less of a thing in Commy RU then in Capitalistic EU. Sorry, but his whining about people wanting equal or comparable treatment is pathetic, as opposed to the rightful complaints from people in this thread. Doesn't matter which holiday it is, EQUAL or COMPARABLE treatment is what people are asking for, and we're not seeing it. Stop whining, you're the pathetic one here who tries to twist people's rightful complaints in something trivial. If you don't care about equal treatment, fine, go crawl in a hole but no need to disrupt this thread making degrading comments to people with an opposite opinion.

Very right, I only mentioned it because you said 'all bb's out turn planes' and in random with +-2 mm this is just not always true and that is where the salt comes from ( that and sailing in straight lines ).

I am not talking about tier X exclusively, take a mid tier BB ( tier VI ) meeting tier VIII carrier with top planes.

If they are, it might be because the 'noobs' did stupid things?

This depends on tier of carrier/planes and bb, stock or not. Against non elited BB's with stock hull, even your stock planes are fast enough to circle.

All that is useless, we don't know exactly how the ships are modelled and how the game calculates penetration ( there are questions and answers regarding aspects of this on the RU forums though ). Use gamesmodel3d to view the actual in game armor layout. If you pay for registration you can also see internal modules. WG would get many +1 if they finally added a viewer themselves which does this for everyone not just the one's willing to pull their wallet for a service which basically datamines the game files ( which afaik isn't even allowed according to EULA ).

So that is more annoying than having to pay 20e for something you can get for 'free'?

Owww that sounds nice, but I wouldn't remove ship progress I would just force them to play certain ships all with pink cammo, and pink cammo means you're visible across the map. Now that would be fun for team killers right

There is no XVM for WoWs yet, the closest you can get is this -> https://github.com/wows-stats Otherwise, I do know people who will spent the 30s queue time looking up everyone on the normal wg profile search, especially during ranked battles. Pretty sure wows-stats uses random battle statistics, not even sure WG api already includes ranked battle statistics

There are no official graphs, I don't think any of the 3rd party stats have a proper graph including all players. But it is safe to assume due to much higher draw rate compared with WoT, that the median is well below 50%.

Public teamspeak server for WoWs is here -> 92.223.3.90:9989 As to people who start a game with: "noobs we will lose", report them for misbehavior in chat. If the do it often enough, they will get a chat ban ( yes, just a chat ban but that's because they only misbehave in chat ). If it's the kind of person which starts with vocal abuse but ends with deliberate sabotage, report them to support with a replay and description of the disruptive behavior. If support tries to blow you off with some kind of automated system reply, escalate the ticket and link them to the game rules. Acting like a douche is bad, we don't need to discuss that, it's already prohibited

I am sorry, but dismissing mathematical truths based on morals is uncalled for and is misplaced when trying to argue with an Aspy. Continue on your own peril For instance, 45%'ers actually don't make up a bit less than half the player base, it's a gaussian distribution and 45% is way closer to the bottom.

My Polish goes as far as Siemka, so even if I wanted I couldn't. Also, every translator I tried makes Polish into very broken English, making it still incredibly hard to decypher what someone meant. I talked with him on Twitch a few times, I don't think he's nearly as arrogant as people are making him out to be, but I admit I'm not the best judge of character at times ;)

I wanted to reply to your previous post but didn't because I felt it wouldn't have the desired effect anyway. But here goes anyway... OVanBruce, you would be surprised how many of your views are shared within ST. It's not point you're making which causes so much friction at times, it's the manner in which you make them.

Playing Devils advocate ( aka I'm defending Neph here ), he said many times he doesn't consider himself 'best player' it was between parenthesis for a reason. It was WG who gave him that 'title', if you don't think it's appropriate, complain to them not to him?

I hate M46, I admit I am not nearly as proficient in WoT as I appear to be in WoWs. Balancing is hard, take Gnevny and Gremlin for instance, Gremlin is no doubt the better of the two in ship stats but if you look at recent performance it's Gnevny all the way.

Sorry if I misread your posts, no I didn't check your recent performance, in fact I solely based my argument on the content of your posts. If you're willing to improve, I applaud you and will offer my help in any way shape or form you desire ( again, not that I'm such a great player, but I do have some basic knowledge about mechanics and objectives ). But like in my previous post: "Turn left!" is something you should consider doing, without thinking 'boy he is impolite, he is probably a douche and I won't listen to a douche'. There is no time in game for better players to hold the hands of lesser players through in game chat. If you're on ts with me I can explain you quickly why I want you to turn left but generally in game there is no time for that. Don't put too much weight on how someone formulates something in chat, I know some very friendly helpful people who will also say 'turn left' ( perhaps with a 'pls' behind it ) but who you can't expect to write elaborate explanations; simply because their English isn't of sufficient level. That you do this is a red flag for me when looking at your performance. When playing, the only thing on your mind should be playing, not 'etiquette'. If you ask me, a lot of communication problems in game can be solved by adding a proper radial menu. I don't even have time in a lot of situations to move my hand to press a function key, let alone type an eloquent request in chat. If we can give quick commands like 'turn left please' or even 'warning, incoming torps from the right!' by a simple 1 second sequence of pressing Z and moving the mouse to the right command, that would make gameplay with random people so much more enjoyable I think.

^^ Each time I bring out my Imperator I pray I get 1 or 2 decent CA's. The rest of the team I do not care about, if their bad it's good as there is more damage for me to do. But having ZERO non braindead CA's really frustrates the hell out of me. CA's which keep shooting BB's when a DD is spotted, or when the only AAA capable CA's rushes off to a cap zone to die in 2 minutes and leaving the BB's without help against planes. If you play CA you're playing a SUPPORT class, yes even IJN CA's while they are good solo machines should still offer support to allied BB's if possible. If I see CA's ignoring DD's I will just disengage and move away, no point in being close to those kind of CA's.

This is a peculiar point, some ship/setups are very powerful against weaker players but perform badly against good players in the same enemy ship. Makes making general balancing changes/proposals very hard as you need to look at skill ceiling and average and below average performance.

1. Perhaps, not worth to debate I guess. 2+3 are true but you're talking like that's not a significant part of the player base?