mtm78
-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Everything posted by mtm78
-
So you want it even easier then you got it now?
-
I am not sure atm, that is all I can say? Which is my point really, RU DD's have some nice pearls in the line, but so does IJN DD line. Imperator is super stronk but I get the same results in Arkensas Beta if not better, so clearly that's also not fully indicative. So I will withhold judgement for now.
-
There is concept art of WoWs with hybrid BB-CV, I was hoping Tone would be the first showcasing what they had planned with that..
-
Aslain is keeping the mod updated in his modpack, Calapine has stopped playing and isn't updating it anymore. There are also two other variants to the zoom out mod included in the pack. http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/12780-mod0513-aslains-wows-modpack-installer-wpicture-preview-v5131-04122015/
-
Not to mention you're never going to use the 'extra' planes in a normal match anyway, you got more planesxflight-time then there are minutes in the game.
-
Corrected your minus 1, please be careful when saying to the [edited] that economy isn't as harsh as they think, it's just their own performance ( mostly ).
-
Well I would have expected lower numbers on EU, it is a RU ship and a lot of the Tirpitz sales were from wheraboo's ( no insult intended ).
-
Maybe the gud players just play RU sheeps? It's also funny you keep referring to Russia and USA in this comparison, as both of those nations don't even have a full tech tree. Maybe it's a bit premature to talk about balance between nations? edit: USA should be GE ofc, USN has a full tech tree, GE ofc hasn't.
-
Yes but he only cares about those because they got the best torps in the game.. can it be that he just dislikes torps and this whole rampage has nothing to do with DD's at all
-
Depressing to see that the Aimbot is back (Dec 5th)
mtm78 replied to NinjaSquirrel's topic in General Discussion
Wow so he did do a total rewrite :0 Guess OVanBruce was right and the guy really does go through all that trouble for some hidden 'e-fame' -
Depressing to see that the Aimbot is back (Dec 5th)
mtm78 replied to NinjaSquirrel's topic in General Discussion
Well this MODification does alter the game and does alter the information output to the user. An aimbot also replaces user input with automatic targeting. Anyway we can argue semantics for eternity, in the end it doesn't matter. WG has said they don't want it in their game and hence we can consider it a cheat, and only they can qualify what is and what is not a cheat in their game. -
http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/38425-dd-matchmaking-in-higher-tiers/page__st__40__pid__720081#entry720081
-
I said I would ask Sharana for the Tirpitz numbers and post them again for reference so here http://maplesyrup.sweet.coocan.jp/wows/ranking/20150912et/average_ship.html Those are quite a lot of sales in a quite short time. I wonder how many Imperators been sold..
-
Sometimes the gods listen
-
Depressing to see that the Aimbot is back (Dec 5th)
mtm78 replied to NinjaSquirrel's topic in General Discussion
Breaking scenery on your minimap in WoT is also just information you're not supposed to have, you saying that banned mod isn't also a 'cheat'? -
No we just established that wasn't what you posted in this thread so you're swiveling a lot but that's ok, we still care!
-
-
Depressing to see that the Aimbot is back (Dec 5th)
mtm78 replied to NinjaSquirrel's topic in General Discussion
Well it is a cheat, so that word definitely applies An aim-bot however doesn't need user input and is something entirely different than what is discussed here. -
That wasn't what you said in this thread now was it, not up till just now, and well you can't expect me to read and remember all your old threads now can you?
-
Depressing to see that the Aimbot is back (Dec 5th)
mtm78 replied to NinjaSquirrel's topic in General Discussion
Lead indicator. -
Which is why I brought it up. We can argue about 'marketing' all we want, based on our own personal 'goal' of getting more content for less money, and we can point to the decline in active players and blame it on the bundles, but then we also have a clear indication those bundles are creating a lot of revenue. Maybe WG has made the calculations that giving more content cheaper isn't going to attract enough new players to make it worth the lower prices? Not sure if that would make me happy if they did, as it would mean WG sees the current playerbase as close to optimal.
-
Sorry guys, my bad, it wasn't > 200k but close to 22k. Sharana posted it somewhere, it was calculated from how many unique players had played Tirpitz in the first two weeks or something ( can't find where he posted it, will ask for a link ). edit: and it was for EU only.
-
I had Yamato, Zao, Des Moines and Fletcher as tier X's ( and IX ) on CBT not to mention those games you won't know about, ever, so the HIGH TIER bit is well covered thank you. And you just shifted your argument from: to many DD's is bad ( 6 being 'to many' ) to; six DD's would be fine if we had CV's. If you want to swivel back and forth that much please do it alone; if not, please just say you think the issue isn't with 'to many dd's' but with 'to many DD's for the amount of CV's in each game'. Would save everyone a lot of trouble.
-
-
Depressing to see that the Aimbot is back (Dec 5th)
mtm78 replied to NinjaSquirrel's topic in General Discussion
Actually it's the same excel sheet, just with additions from not only the author but from mod users feedback as well it seems.
