mtm78

Simple solution, learn stronk tectics and become the FC yourself Yup, that's the spirit. Surely it will pay dividend in the end as teamwork wins games, so investing a little effort in getting even a tiny bit of a teamwork ( which cap's to focus, which targets to prioritize, if a flank should play offensive or defensive and so on.. ) will pay out if you can get the people to listen.

Most logical place imo is center screen above your ammo/consumables, or am I missing something? Size should scale with display size, larger screen area usually also means people sit further away. WoWs seem to have issues with saling with multi monitor or really high res screens ( I hear, I only have 1080p and secondary screen is even 1680x1050 ) so placement and size of eventual subtitles could very well be lumped on the lot with those issues. Especially on multi monitor setups I hear a very often requested option would be to keep the UI in the center screen instead of ship compass on left, consumables and ammo in center and minimap on right screen. Should all be possible by modding btw, all UI elements can be moved with editing xml files.

No subs ( I can't make out heads or tails either, guess eventually I'll get used to it and I will know what the heck 'torpedoes port' is in Japanese ). Subs would be a nice addition though!

It was said that you will need the ARP Kongou and Myoko to unlock further ARP content down the road, I am hoping WG will do so based on the anime and 'fixes' Iona's voice over for them. I want Haruna

Well obviously, but even then he's doing far better with both the regular Myoko and Kongo compared to me, so don't mind me saying Trigger_Happy_Dad creates a feeling of PogChamp pretty often when watching his video's. Though I do think he should do voice commentaries on his replays as I think it will teach other players ( not necessarily new one' s ) how to play the game better, though even without it's never ResidentSleeper. The fact that all this knowledge about tactical decisions is not ( yet! ) always passed on makes me BibleThump. Carry on! Kappa

TTT.... Just lost a match because some 'I play for fun' people thought it was funny to bring two Fuso's with an Amagi ending in an tier X match..... I told them how I feel about it, but 'they play for fun' and 'at the end of the match I would be the noob'. They didn't do terrible btw, but I think I had one of my best matches ever in Ibuki doing ~120k dmg and we would have won if we had similar tier ships. That bs costed me 20 minutes of my life, and a bunch of flags wasted because some 'players' 'play for fun'.

Nah YOU'RE OpOpie Kappa

I'm doing worse with ARP Kongo then regular, simply because you start with a 1 point captain ( I retrain captains especially since I already had multiple point IJN captains from my CA and DD line which were not assigned to ships any more ).

I don't even know what an 'MTS subscriber' is...

Select Yokusuka port ( or w/e it's spelled ), it's mentioned in every announcement about the missions.

Did you get a chat ban by any chance? If so, and you think it's wrongly given to you, open a ticket with support. But, please, post their reply in this thread as they will specify why you got the ban and I bet we're all very interested in knowing what you think isn't worth one.

You're such a funny guy

I don't think regions are that free to change ship characteristics between them. If a ship has characteristic A on region A it should have it on region B ( can you think of any ship in the game where this is not the case? ).

ALT+ENTER twice will fix this ( full screen toggle ). No way to know when it will be patched edit: btw what programming experience you have with AAA game titles which qualifies you to make a statement like that?

B hull only gives AAA increase, I'd say fire control is much more useful ( range with 155's is everything ). edit: slight rudder time improvement and a tiny bit more hp as well with B hull but imo still not worth it over Fire Control upgrade.

We will need some more info to determine if we can help you -> http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/35743-how-to-report-a-bug/ If you would post the required info ( dxdiag output, log file ) it might shine some light on your issue

I feel dynamic deformations would add so much immersion it would be worth it if technically feasible. But I agree it probably isn't

Can we agree to disagree partially? I don't think it's impossible, I would like them to add some extra effects to the anime ships, but I don't think it will happen and I think it will be because of aforementioned reasons. Now, I'm not a game designer and I have very limited knowledge about the DX api's, you might have a better background to judge the technicalities then me so again as I said it's just my opinion and I am surely not going to claim it's more than that. Btw just a question: how do you think the damage textures look? There is no mesh deformation, it's just a 'damaged' texture over the same mesh. I don't think that would be the case if there were no technical limitations they run into ( because mesh deformation would give much much more realistic damage models ).

Which is EXACTLY what I was talking about

Do you remember the space battles ( probably not, since you weren't in beta )? I had less fps there while there was no sea to be rendered. Though I agree tracers are not going to tax any system much. Force fields however, depending on how you want to render them, can be taxing ( transparency effects, bending light going through a force field, ripple effects when hit ). Ofc, I am not saying it's impossible, I am saying I think WG made the decision to not go deeply into this because it would not run on a significant enough portion of the systems in their player base to offset the work involved in getting it incorporated into the game. You can be 100% right and I can be 100% wrong, but we'll never know until WG would give an official statement about graphical effects for ARP content in the future.

Which makes it less efficient to spend large amount of resources on if only those with top rigs would be able to use them ( which is my point actually ).

About the game crashing -> http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/35743-how-to-report-a-bug/ Follow the advice in the post, either create a ticket and supply them with the info and/or post your dxdiag and log files here and people might be able to help.

I know, which is why I haven't posted anything conclusive I want a sample size of at least 20 to 30 matches in current meta ( and even that can be seen as 'anecdotal' I agree ).

Ich spreche keine Deutsch Ok jokes aside, the guy I addressed changed his post because I was right; and your german is a lot better then mine so that is why I will ask people who post in the English section to do so in English. That is not something which is reserved only to moderators, it's just common courtesy to post in the correct language and anyone can address people not doing so ( well ask them, not tell them ). I think you might have read my posts as a 'command' and in that case you're absolutely right, it's not my place to 'command' people. The plox part was actually there to indicate without a doubt it was a request, and not a command edit: btw -> plox seems to be in a dictionary, so it's a 'real' word

Why don't you take your own advice 'buddy'