mtm78

You guys should play with strangers123 he is the master of kemp island

Polar light is not in client...... And nope, other dock is not bug free

Uhm does anyone have a dl link to Polar Lights dock as separate download

Enemy lexi has 2 kills, I don't see him complaining?

Aldramelech would you please stop taking all my +1's this is the first thread I am reading today and I'm already out I guess I think OP wouldn't have lasted long on a weekday...

Buh bye 1100 forum + rep....

Who cares for Takao, Haruna is where the cake is at But, if you look closely to the profile, it does match Takao's hair style

I thought this info was already mentioned in Sharana's guide somewhere?

The more I think of it, considering his nick and the obvious thread subject, I think we been had ;)

I wonder how long before the vukkening..

Better once to many than not at all

Takeda posted it in his thread already -> http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/31444-some-interesting-info-from-ru/page__fromsearch__1 edit: ouch damn ninja's

Wait, did you really make a thread because an enemy told you to quit playing a certain way? Anything the enemy tells you to not do, is something you should do more often ( unless they're messing with you trying to bait you into doing something stupid, in which case you show the opposite reaction and actually listen to them ).

Modifications has a whole section dedicated to itself?

Yup, XP is awarded based on % of hp you remove from enemy sheep, DD has fewer XP HP so you take bigger % with each hit thus earn more XP. So again, you cruisers refusing to listen and attack the darn DD's when I'm playing BB and expecting you to do your job, you're causing yourself to have a lesser result just as well as you're trying to proof to me you don't understand the darn game ;) edit: there was a XP where it should be HP, fixed now ( and I think message was even clear enough with the error but just in case ).

Because we are not talking about BB vs BB but a CA playing at max range, stop comparing totally incomparable things which aren't even related. It's not about range ( or speed ) it's about tactical use of your ship.

Game servers were restarted daily before iirc, 4AM every night, reboot usually takes only a couple of minutes and 4AM is I think the time when fewest people are online anyway. One reason I can think of to reset the servers is performance, long running processes can have more luggage ( garbage collection leftovers for instance ) so a restart of them is beneficial to us as players.

There is no 'General Discussion' any more A Q&A section would be really nice to have, a dedicated suggestion section doesn't sound bad either Remember the forum has just undergone some changes pretty recently, I trust WG is looking at how the new format works and will be taking into account feedback like this for any possible future enhancements. Aren't those moved to 'Archive' section -> http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/forum/486-archive/

Rudder shift time was the first thing I noticed, it's really not able to dodge return fire like a Murmansk can ( and it doesn't have the range, nor the scout plane ). The AAA is bad as well, but a float fighter at that tier might even be more beneficial as it panics bombers. Also the sonar is nice, but I don't feel as comfortable with her going into a smoke cloud even with sonar as the rudder shift time still makes me feel really vulnerable against close range torpedo launches. Also, the torps might reload really fast, it's 6k dmg per torps and their slow. Overall, a nice USN crew trainer but I said it in the other thread and I'll say it here again: she aint no Murmansk

You do mean people on your own team I suppose? Depends, you should not stay at max range if you have a BB 10km in front of you who is about to get eat a lot of fish ( aka torpedoes ) just because his CA 'escort' is 'using his range'. You should not ALWAYS use your ships strengths, only when the situation allows it. Sometimes you have do something for your team, like being more to the front and do your job Same goes btw for me, just yesterday I was getting really salty because I had 'censored' people in cruisers either doing stupid stuff like shooting at BB's when a DD is spotted close by, and dying to BB's because they pushed them with their CA's ( stupid! ). The whole match I am telling everyone to focus the darn DD's but nope, cruisers just derping around being 'useless'. Which meant my Fuso had to stay well back because Fuso doesn't fight DD's well. It's not a Kongo which is a BC and can actually turn and evade torps from unspotted DD's. And then one of the CA's accused me of 'sniping'.... ye I HAD to snipe because the CA's didn't do their job. Enemy DD in the end still almost got me when all the CA 'players' were dead except one ( max range sniping German CA obviously.. also the one saying I was a noob and that I shouldn't snipe... it was his ffin fault I had to snipe, whole game did not shoot the DD once and yes I spammed focus fire and I pinged the darn map and I told them CA players you get XP based on the hp PERCENTAGE you remove from a target so shooting DD's gives more XP then tickling BB.. but no one listened, because screw doing your job right... ) Just to give an example, it doesn't really matter at what range if you can't even shoot the right targets. CA's job is to kill DD's and engage other CA's, not go after enemy BB on their own ( ow and ofc screen BB from torps if needed and give AAA cover ). Basically, we need people to be able to judge the strategic and tactical situation, using minimap basically. Knowing your ships strong points and using them doesn't help if the tactical situation doesn't benefit from it. Well that is you care for actual teamwork ( and thus getting more victories ).

How else to teach them to not be scared of the dark ps: and what about the electricity bill edit: About the 'team battles without clans' being bad; I play with a lot of different people who are in a lot off different WoT clans. If we can make teams with people from other clans that would only be beneficial, as some smaller WoT clans maybe don't have the player count to play in WoWs competitively if they weren't capable of joining teams without clan restrictions?

Nice game! I like Murmansk's rudder the most, and this is more like a B hull Omaha in that regard ( or so it feels like ). But it has sonar and float fighter ( crap AAA though ). It's by definition not bad since it's an Omaha and those are all quite good imo, but it won't dodge return fire like a Murmansk can ( nor does it have the same range ). Though I am using a 'better' captain on my RU ships though that might help as well.

I won a Marblehead, thank you WG! ps: She aint no Murmansk though

TheBeastNL is an NA account -> http://warships.today/player/1017376525/na/TheBeastNL There is no TheBeastNL on EU server. The NA account indeed has the Koningsberg. WG does not move accounts between servers, ofc you are free to ask support but I don't think they'll bite. Guess it means you have to make an EU account and grind again ( be happy, it's only to tier 5 ).

Actually you're at least partially wrong; the chat ban will indeed not be revoked as the time it takes to process a ticket outlast the length of his chat ban. However, that was not why he should make a ticket. If you abuse the report system ( by giving false reports resulting in people getting sanctioned by the automated system ) you're breaking EULA and are in fact yourself open to sanctions. That is why, if you think you got banned because of abuse of the automated system, you make a ticket. Not because it will fix your chat ban, but to make sure the people who are abusing the implemented in game report system will have an incentive to quit doing such. You're under the impression it seems that no one ever got sanctioned for abusing the automated complaint system, I can tell from own experience that this is a wrong assumption.