mtm78

Well I can ask my division mates to suicide can't I, that's a perfectly normal and valid request no It's surprisingly hard I guess because winning vs 4 isn't the issue it's getting in that 1v4 situation where you have the ship and hp to take care of those remaining enemies. As to CQE I think I got that on my tier IV Imperator Nicolai I, by dogfighting other BB's and killing some DD's with my secondaries as well. You need to be really lucky ( my secondaries started I think in total 8 fires that match! ). My Witherer was I think with a IJN CA ( Mogami? ), was also incredibly lucky ( evident from my one in 16xx games ). Guess it's way easier with CV's though.

And I am on Windows10 and I'm in battle with 40 to 50 seconds to spare on the count down. Sorry, it's not windows10 but your system/hw. If you're in the 'fast ring' then there are some problems with games crashing when switching from full screen to windowed and back. Removing yourself from fast ring updates is recommended if you value a bug free experience.

Who cares for the flags, I just want the ribbons Guess I didn't have any 1v4 victories, shame, now I will have to focus on getting one. Just as clear sky... I might have to play Bogue AS again ( also for pearls... I tried strike setup Bogue but I am a really terrible clicker captain so that didn't end well ).

I know, that is why I anticipate watching the games being a spectacle in it's own right

Well I don't have Tirpitz neither did nex_gen nor Kiev so our lineup would be quite static

I wish solo warrior had always been there, I am quite sure I been in multiple games where I was 1v4 and won but it was before they added this achievement I think.. ( or not.. in which case I'm exaggerating my own performance ). I was also quite sure I've gotten clear sky previously while playing a cruiser, but I think those been removed when they changed the requirements for that as well. All other achievements I have, the rarest Witherer ( once, in 16xx games ) and the most common Devastating Strike ( once every 7 games ). But to the OP's question: no Confederate award is not that hard to get, but it's one which you should not chase after. You should keep focusing on bringing down enemy ships as fast as possible, and not switch targets after doing 20% damage to them ( yes, you can actually farm them if you want to ).

+1 and -1 ability on forum has been removed, in game you can do it in game through ctrl+right click on name+ choose your option ( compliment = +1 / report = -1 ), or through the battle results screen.

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/21275-tip-how-to-change-server-and-play-wows-on-all-servers-eu-na-ru-asia-using-one-game-client/

Atago and Nagato would have been me and nex_gen's preferred line up throughout, honestly if there are CA's in a team I can't think of a better one then Atago ( heal + crazy cammo + decent damage dealing ability ). Sorry for not being able to attend, but I'm still probably going to watch the rest of you guys play

Nice work, been waiting for something like this. If you really need the older clients, maybe someone I know can help you with that

Understand I don't the question, but answer probably yes will be

I am mtm78, and I approve this message

Navigator works normally ( though I can still not watch any of my replays ).

The other possible reason is that he is protecting himself from being 'driven' that far again by denying himself the ability to verbally abuse his fellow players ;)

I don't think you can attribute this to the people posting in this thread alone, there was more feedback also on social platforms and other forums which reached WG. And the number next to the person's name is the number of posts in this thread? Do you think that the more people posted the 'clearer' the message was? I don't, I think there are some people who only posted once or twice and in those posts have been more constructive than some of the high post count spammer ( like that mtm78 guy... jezus what a spammer ). Just saying, I appreciate that you're attributing this to the community as a whole, but you shouldn't limit it to this thread or quantify it by posts in it. The entire community, or everyone who spoke against the previous situation, be it on this forum, facebook ( ugh... facebook bleh ) or the feedback on the official announcement pages or any other place, are to be commended for their persistence and also in their ability to for the largest part keeping the discussion constructive ( enough.. ). Everyone who identifies himself with the above is entitled to the warm and fuzzy feeling

Young padawan, much to learn you have. Full of humor this thread is, opening post liked by WG developer even has. This is already what is happening in game, I will go for the easy kills first ( as even easily killed enemies have guns which WILL hurt me eventually ) and I observe the same in almost every match happening to me. If you're weaving like a baws and give only small profiles and use range, and your team still has bob's giving broadside; who do you think the enemy is more likely to shoot? The only times this isn't the case is when there are people on the enemy team who know me and who told the team to focus me down. Luckily, those are few and far between as honestly I'm just a scrub and don't deserve that kind of attention I agree on your skill based matchmaking analysis .

if the goals in this event are unattainable I would suggest playing a different game... The frag mission are just that, getting kills with ships from different tiers ( if you can't kill enemy ships... you should improve your play or go play something else ). The 'get xp' missions you will attain with normal playing ( unless you're constantly on the bottom of the XP ladder, in which case.... Or maybe play PvP and not PvE, but that one is obvious from the start ). edit2: Actually the 1800 base xp will be quite hard for a lot of people, so for that one I shall retract my statement. If you can't win any battles... sorry but no.... The goals are the easiest imaginable, the ONLY threshold there is to get 'enough' pearls is how much time you're willing to invest. btw ->

I guess he meant that MM wise tier 7 ships have it hard. tier 8 is already a big step up from 7 and between tier 9 and 10 the hit isn't as large. Whether that is universally true or not is up for debate off course, but it's the only explanation I can think off.

Get your boss to allow you divulge a tad more information, community manager who can only be so vague is to easy to misinterpret or even attribute malice to But...

If you grind for the rewards, you can always not select Yokosuka port so you won't even see the ships in your port. As to not being able to sell them, I guess it is to protect themselves against their own decision as there will be subsequent missions which you will only be able to do in the ARP ships ( though I read that we will be able to earn/unlock the ARP Kongou and Myoko later still as well ).

Since you can't mute the quick commands I don't think it's that bad. Usually situational awareness and sometimes the quick commands should be enough, and for those who really need to read something in the chat before reacting on it.. well those aren't usually a big help anyway. As above, you can replace much of the chat with situational awareness ( but not all ). In domination mode maps if I were you I would wait with muting chat for the first 30 seconds so you can hear/participate on which cap's your team will focus. I am kind of happy there is no check box, I would rather see people to have chat enabled for the simple fact that I do use chat to communicate ( and there is no way to see if someone else has chat disabled ). But if someone asks in the forum, well I mean it's bad form to not share how to disable it

Statistical historical performance gives an indication, but it is not conclusive. Even broken clocks tell the right time a day twice

Yes but those are old stats, they won't update.

I know it is not the intended use but it was more often then not the case that it were the posts which were overly rude or breaking forum rules which collected the most downvotes, so while I am fully aware they were not a moderation aid in the official sense, they were surely used by the community to 'self moderate'. Now, as I said before, I am also aware it was being abused, and I also said I am hoping that the lack of this system will not cause 'troll posts' to be up on the forum for longer ( people are not that prone to report posts to the moderators, it feel's like being a tattletale, while this 'self moderation through the reputation system' was widely being used ). That this usage wasn't intended doesn't mean it wasn't effective ( leaving out the abuse by being able to downvote old posts ). edit: hiding the amount of downvotes and making them exclusive to moderators isn't a bad suggestion btw..

The downvotes were a clear indication that the post content should be scrutinized, mods can't read all posts you know