mtm78

Maybe not cry hacks in thread title if you don't even know basic game mechanics or just not come cry on forums then? My manners are fine, yours are lacking. Your parents should have thought you to not start crying before you're actually hurt All hands on deck !!! edit: ollenborre already said it o7

There is none because the automated system is intended to handle them ( if it does so 'sufficiently' is another debate ). Just like the enemy player who kept crying the whole match asking us to report someone on his team for 'team damage' when there is no option to do so. And then he calls me idiot and noob ( I checked, 46% wr player calling me noob ). Either way, OP's post will get removed from forums for breaking the rules. Ow and I didn't watch the video but it seems you shot back with guns and torps, which makes you just as eligible for sanctions... not a smart move to cry about something like this and then showing YOU are also breaking rules. edit: totally missed the date....

Stop crying hacks if you don't even know normal game mechanics ffs, it's getting tiresome.

Which means we really could use some 'in smoke' UI indicator

Ok, but that still doesn't change the fact that battleships were obsolete for naval engagements halfway through WWII, and carrier task force's became the main attack force. Even the first attack on USN assets by IJN was done through a carrier task force. How many BB on BB engagements happened during WWII? IJN's doctrine which resolved on BB's failed hard because of the rise in effectiveness of carrier task forces, while there been a lot of surface vessel vs surface vessel engagements the main threat was always the carriers.

Yeah that is the problem with house troll's, people read what they write and it lingers in the back of their head to the point where they might actually consider his driveling nonsense to be possibly true. I run premium account, and ow boy do I whish I that it would give me 'better RNG' or 'better MM' or 'better' anything except better income and experience gain.

Yubari was part of the pre order ships, they will be sold again but WG said they would stay exclusive for at least one year.

How about the Glorious battle of MK vs the Atlantic Storm then Ok, leaving RU navy out of ( it doesn't even have a full tech tree so should be excluded from this mode till for now anyway ), I think some USN vs IJN themed battles would actually interest a lot of people as long as the balance between the nations in such setups is competitive

I met EsaTuunanen in 4 matches yesterday, was very impressed. Guess being in division with him is kind of stacking the odds there though

This sounds like fun, could almost turn it into 'historical battle' like scenario's with nation specific fleets ( which failed horribly in WoT but might work in WoWs? ).

Uhm ye I have, and uhm no the biggest enemy of a DD should be a CA, or if you're an IJN DD any RU or USN DD atm, but the biggest enemy of an RU DD or USN DD is another RU DD or USN DD or a CL/CA. But ye, fun right, for the BB, having 1 BB and 4 CA's to shoot and then to hide and prey the enemy DD's are stupid? This game is not about historical accuracy, not at all even. Otherwise we would have carriers off map who would sent their waves of bombers to the next map dominating everything ( because let's face it, BB's were already obsolete for naval warfare during the second half of WWII ). The game is about fun, and yes it would be fun for gunboat DD's to fight with other DD's exclusively but that's not how things work. Would perhaps be a fun 'extra' game mode, DD frenzy, but nothing more then that.

Yeah no, this wouldn't be FUN and this game should be fun. 3-4 dd's per team on average is enough.

Unlike a seemingly large proportion of this forums users, I am not a camera adept at all. I mean, my 'bestest' camera was a so called superzoom bridge camera ( which died... ) and I'm currently only in possession of the camera in my phone ( which is even for a phone, a louse one ). So yes, I was surprised that a camera that old would get good image quality ( I expected some 'wear and tear' on the lenses, shutter mechanism and such, enough to be reflected in the final image ). Sorry for being such a noob, I will try and better myself What would help me with this, is Vogel starting that thread in Off-Topic and posting some of his other shots, I am sure there are plenty who will drop bye and share their own and I bet it will be both fun and educational ( educational for noobs like me, fun for everyone ).

We really do need clear confirmation on how the event actually works as even I am not entirely sure atm. Not that I really NEED the reward ship, but it wouldn't hurt if I did get it ;)

Faster ROF but lower alpha, and way way way worse armor, not to mention having most turrets facing backwards. Arkensaus is stronk, but not stronk like Glorious Russian Battleship ps: my Arkensaus win rate > Imperator win rate BUT Imperator dmg >> Arkensaus dmg

Ow we are not in disagreement, I just wanted to point out that the mods are from a modpack available on this very forum. Btw, your 'minor' minimap mod is THE most influential mod there is atm ( aside of actual cheat mods as the aim assist ). In WoWs situational awareness is the most important thing in any class, and the minimap with ship names, last known detected location and detection ranges are what gives people better awareness. Even my crosshair isn't as big an help as the minimap mod. And I've mentioned this to the 'powers that be' more than once. Hopefully we will see them integrate these mods ( WoT also has multiple crosshairs and last known location ect ) into vanilla. Other really cosmetic mods like skins and players panel icon's, achievement ribbons and so on are not important to actual gameplay, but the former one's do have influence. edit: btw this game is called WoWs and not WoW ( World Of Warcraft ) edit2: and also, just to make clear, I might be in moral agreement with you on the integration of modifications; our morals don't apply, it's WG's game and their rules, so I'm following those because it would be ludicrous to put myself at a disadvantage vs other players following the rules set out by the company which makes this game.

This sounds so serious, I am sure WG is on their knees begging you to stay /off topic As MrConway has stated a couple of times by now, the web site is separated from the back end which collects the data, even if the website is showing the wrong info everything should be correctable. While I share the discomfort for not being able to track my progress reliably, I am not afraid we will loose pearls because of it.

Not 100% controllable, but sector assignable iirc. CA wouldn't be capable of parking his spotter over you, the CA would be able to tell the spotter to go South West and fly circles there for instance. Still, it would be a big nerf to DD's. ps. Not all CA captains are totally ineffective when shooting from max range Tier 9 and 10 ( aka tier 8+) already has the heal.

Spotter plane ( controllable ) would be to give CA's better ability to counter DD's at higher tier ( because of the long range torps ), and I would really like it if they do this. But it wouldn't add anything in a CA vs BB fight. And I don't think it should either, Senjou doesn't need to dodge better, and Hindenburg doesn't turn that fast because it's as big as a battleship. I think the problem with high tier cruisers is not 100% BB's, but just that people playing them remember getting hit hard a lot more then when their shot for 800dmg. If statistically CA's need a buff, I would sooner expect them to adjust the heal ability of cruisers at tier 9 and 10, and maybe extend it to tier 8.

Mhm it would actually be easier with higher tier opponents, more HP going around. Like posted above, he would have removed a very large percentage from enemy team's total HP pool which is pretty insane

Mhm a PL Destroyer .... can't be Blys... would be to obvious right

Every single community manager and moderator had positive reputation, your statement is a blatant lie ;)

It should, and it does, but I wanted to emphasize it so people would know that even if you have a team which just refuses to be carried, you can still get top XP

Sorry not sure, have to ask WG people for those things ( would be nice if it was visible on the website when they will reset, would also allow people to hurry the grind if they are running the risk of not making the deadline ).

Did you visit the forum during cbt?