mtm78

quoted post removed Here, these are my mods. Now, ask WG to ban me like I just reported your post for slander.

Ow it is just very simple; I don't like being accused of cheating. Stop insinuating/accusing me and other users of allowed mods of cheating and we will get along all nice and dandy Even just adding 'in my opinion' to the post I quoted would be fine. I can live with people having a different opinion as long as they present it as such, and not claim it's an universal truth.

Ow I am not surprised some interpret it differently but; asking for it to be standard and saying killing the cheat would kill the game... 1+1 = 3?

That is where low tier games and co op battles are for. Yes the aiming has a learning curve but we ALL went through it. Every ALPHA tester kicked my [edited]for a very very long time, then OBT started and I could finally kick puppies new players myself. It's the natural order, more experienced people are better at a skill based game. And WG in response will make tier 1-3 a bit of a safe haven for new players with low account level.

Listen 'dude', it's only cheating if the developers say so, please stop insulting legitimate mod users.

Together with your signature you're basically plain out admitting you're cheating. Shame on you

You think that is bad, imagine 12 tier X IJN carriers About the team compositions: I have to admit I don't like ranked concept so I don't have the current experience needed to comment on what works and what not. In theory you're right; just focus on one cap kill all there and then move on -> should be most effective tactic.

12% bonus from concealment skill, he means high tier cruisers get access to an equipment module which add 16% range to them. Ibuki can cammo fire without concealment expertise at 17.3km and it only get's better from there

You only get a notification if two or more people reported you, and atm 'plays badly' reports ( or 'plays well' / 'helpful in chat' ) have no effective use other then influencing the players Karma. The only report option which can have consequences other than Karma is 'misbehavior in chat' and that indeed should always get validated by a human ( or a very very very good automated system which analyzes the actual chat and not just goes by number of reports, though ye if you get on average 5 reports per game for being toxic in chat it's kind of obvious that you deserve any chat ban which might come out of it ).

DD's are great for contesting caps, ranked battles resolve a lot around cap and map control. Maybe with team battles we will see 12 Shimakaze's teams and it will be proven once and for all that their either an 'OP class' or not Private user profile complaining about game balance... /ignore

Me and Mister_Greek just had a pink DD, 10 seconds into the game I said to them ( Havaduck was also in the division ) that he was going to kill someone and yup as soon as his torps were loaded he killed one of our ships ( and he died in the process ). I agree that some changes are highly desired, pink ships should absolutely not be able to deal team damage at the very least ( they are but only after X amount of damage when it get's reflected backwards this is a gradual slope and instead it should have much steeper steps ). edit: Admiral_H_Nelson, on 07 February 2016 - 12:12 AM, said: The only reason that we have thread after thread about it is because Wargaming do nothing about it. No, the only reason of the multiple threads is because current one's get locked because people break the rules

Those are not allowed to be posted on the forums, only edited video's as what you're proposing is still naming and shaming IF posted on forums. What happens on YT is not under WG's influence

Then don't give them reasons to lock it ;) I know about the frustration all too well, a thread as this one which when adhering to the rules can stay up and not get locked while still giving WG feedback from forum community about the issue.

I am color blind, thanks for showing some people are here just to troll and spoil things for the rest

Ok so your max is acceptable now but you're getting very bad drops. That is at least more clear now. Disable all post processing -> big drain when ships explode, are on fire ect and thus major cause of the slow down's in those situations. Also, disabling 'animate small objects' can take some strain of your cpu and perhaps prevent some of the low dips.

I am trying to tell you to first remove your GForce Experience profile for World Of Warships and try to play the game using the default driver settings. I hope it would work better; as it did before the latest patch, as I suspect GFExperience could have changed some settings when you tried to optimize after the last patch which actually hinder performance.

Answers in blue

Ask him to remove his promotion/justification of team killing and all will be hopefully fine..

My Arkensaus has higher win rate then my Impregnator ( but the latter does more damage, and imo is more fun to play ). Arkensaus is much better suited to handle DD's if need arises, the glacial traverse and lower rof hurt Impy there a lot.

Sure minimap shows angle as well but it's a lot harder to track in the heat of the moment.

If you want to be the one who get's this locked at least be honest about it. But your 'excuse' will probably be that you did not even bother to read the thread before replying. No, actually that's only half the argument, the other half got closed because of 'people' justifying/promoting team killing in them as done above.

Or he is just rubbing it in people's faces that 'someone' is cheating and no one can do anything about it

So you use it? There is a big difference between lead assist and custom crosshairs. While all your points are morally true, it is not our decision which constitutes as a cheat and which not. I am using all of the mods you're talking about, and that does not make me a cheater. WG has not banned any of the mods you listed, I talked about many mods with many people even before they were 'popular' and as long as there is no official mentioning of a mod being undesired / banned they are legal modifications. Minimap imo should be in vanilla wot, just as various crosshairs ( just like in WoT ). There are people capable of manually tracking all ships without the minimap mod ( I play with one of those sometimes in division ) , I came a bit dependent on it since it got introduced. The biggest advantage is not even last known position but the detection circles for air and sea. Using the mod I been much more successful at evading multiple ships. Navigator mod -> the biggest 'trick' btw is not the angle showing, it is that as long as you keep the enemy targetted behind an island it still shows heading ( which imo should be changed as it's like EOS mod which allowed you to look over islands -> banned ). XVM -> since I installed it my performance went down ( = I am using it wrong ). Colored tracers -> if you look at the original dds they are already different, but I am color blind and I can't notice it in game. So for me using them is imo fair game ( though I can't even say for sure that the difference in colors for standard tracers is even nearly as big as the modded one is for people like me... infact I think the stock one's were red(ish) and orange(ish) glows which for most people with good eyesight would be hard to spot in the game. I'd give you this one, as it does give very valuable info ( simplest form -> BB shooting HE will be a better choice to show some broadside then a BB shooting AP ). But, as how I started the post: it's not up to individual players to call a mod a cheat or not, it's up to the game developers. That being said, if it turns out the only way to get rid of cheats is to completely remove modding ability, so be it. I'd rather not fight trolls with cheats in game

Isn't it kind of obvious you can't buy things which aren't in a store? Did he really expect them to contact him back and tell him he is so special he will get the ship when there are countless of people who would also be able to buy things which aren't available in stores but who don't have the audacity to expect WG to make them available 'just for them'? To me he sounds like a toddler who wants a toy which is just out of reach off his chubby arms. As I said, would -1

It won't -> http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/31444-some-interesting-info-from-ru/page__st__580__pid__831362#entry831362