mtm78

Nice to hear the suggestion worked as advertised ;)

I got killed by one, I would like some compensation as well

Whenever someone mentions statistics on this forum I feel this irresistible urge to post this image ->

If I was nitpicking I would say you didn't put in enough effort .. but yeah I see your point. Just as Mister_Greek who had uni things to take care off, I wouldn't want you to call in sick just to get enough pearls But my point isn't about you just missing the amount of pearls, it's more about those who never participated and who would still be able to buy it. I just like having a visible sign of the participation/effort that is all. I would be ok with it if they'd sell it as Kamikaze R to everyone who signed up for the project and actually collected some pearls, and sell it as Kamikaze XYZwhatever to everyone else. Anyway, it's not up to me anyway remember

Good plan. The thing is, his zoom mods also change FOV and having the options all there would make sure people can always be responsible for keeping to the same fov they were used to before. I too had issues when I was using it ( tbh, because of the mess it was for some time, I went to ProShips for this patch as it was sorted quicker ). The navigator mod crashes in combination with minimap from Kvalme, never tested stand alone but I'm not sure if it's a mod conflict. Sadly, my log files have cycled past the error messages but now that I know they are looking for them I might reinstall it again. Could you forward logs to them if/when we have those? I don't have an RU account and my Russian is also... non-existent

Screenshot of the game itself doesn't include any overlays, screenshot ability of desktop is privacy sensitive. This would require at least alteration of the EULA afaik. Btw, your estimate of a few hundred screenshots per day... I think you can multiply that with ten if not with itself on busy days.

And you succeeded! The team battles were much more fun the the divisions following them Which reminds me, met annimetities and his team, we lost because the rest of my team were such scrubs

Nah but invisi torping is one of the things I really like about playing IJN DD's. The problem of shima walls should be addressed differently imo, not with removing stealth torping. There are consumables and captain skills geared to countering stealth fired torpedo's, if that's not enough there is tweaking to be done no doubt but in general I kind of like the current meta. Sorry, you made a good proposal, and yes it's a long text and some of the points I do agree sound good on their own. I just can't agree with a meta where 'more aggressive play' is facilitated by more survivability ( especially from HE for BB's... they are already very strong with their massive HP and 100% heal ability from fires ). I do like the magazine mechanics you're mentioning, loosing rate of fire and traverse speed ( instead of getting knocked out entirely right away ). Though, historically I do think more ships had turrets permanently disabled it would make the game feel less rng dependent if you wouldn't lose firepower quite arbitrally ( in the eyes of the player ). A bit closer matched random MM would be more balanced in terms of winchance, but it's not always easy with the ships currently in the queue. With team battles we can make our own lineups, which makes for much closer games overall.

The turrets on Atago are fine, but the most crucial thing: it get's heal. You should never lose in a 1v1 with any equal tier cruiser because of that, except another Atago.

RU doesn't have the Mikasa, so NA selling Kamikaze R is not so detrimental to keeping the R designation exclusive to those who spent the effort. If you want the ship you shouldn't really object to getting it with a different name as long as it's the same ship.. I spent the effort because I was looking forward for an exclusive reward ship. Off course, I heard that it was probably going to be sold, and as soon as I heard that I said the same as I'm saying here -> don't. I like to be able to tell the difference between those who spent the effort and those who bought it. That doesn't exclude anyone from owning the same ship, as WG is free to change the name to Kamikaze Xyzwhatever and sell it and people would get the exact same ship. It's not like the R designation is historically bound to any real ship is it, so no one should complain if they do. edit: btw nice edit on your post, even unticked the 'Show 'Edit by' line

And you know NOTHING off the backgrounds of that story. [edited]

I hope never. They can sell the Kamikaze S for all I care ( same exact ship with a different letter ) but keeping it as visible reward for the contribution in the pearl hunt would please those who put in the effort.

I hope you apologized

Heresy! Unless you have any proof

I know, it is multi layered and I took it as a jest no worries. The Swedes told me that in all explanations it's never a compliment though hence my comment

Look, I think I understand your point but you didn't get ours. You don't know what the person in front is already doing, or needs to do, and people in the front line's just don't need to have to worry about weekend warriors ( not saying that is you, but in general it's almost exclusively those type of players ) endangering them from behind. The chance that you can kill someone with second line torps is not worth the risk. The guy in front is closer and has a higher chance of doing damage then you have, which is why it is seen as just being selfish and trying to get some cheap damage in when the guy in front is taking all the risks. If you feel the need to launch torps, have the balls to be in the front line so you don't endanger your allies. The only ships which should be endangered by your torpedo's are your enemies. About the all is fair in love and war part; are you sure you want to state that in this thread with all the comments you already made? There been some nice suggestions on how to deal with what you're saying, people might just take you up on your 'all is fair in love and war' statement. edit: and yes I did die in two games already at least because some 'xxxxxx' player acted like a 'xxxxxx' and shot torpedo's from behind me. Those two players are even posting in this thread

You guys got me curious... I only have 47k dmg in Ibuki but 63% win rate I guess it's just as important where you do the damage then how much you do exactly.. and I 'cheated' a lot by playing in divisions almost exclusively

The important part of what you seem to wrongly interpret is this ->

With that damage I am sure you just have to low a battle count in her to get a win rate representative of your skill Don't worry to much about it, it will go up.

Sturmtiger304's, looking forward to seeing you there edit: damn double quote's..

What is the Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe, and Everything ( including understanding of game mechanics )?

edit: btw, you're right, it can happen by accident. If it was, I hope you will never do it again as you should know better next time. You at least apologized, and for that I am grateful. You at least are manning up to your mistakes and unlike some other poster in this thread you're not excusing yourself with claiming that the other guy was actually responsible. ps: do you have teamspeak? If you do, come to Forumites channel in game ( password is 'play4fun' ) and if I'm around we'll play some games in division and maybe we can get your torpedo habits to improve a bit so you're not that much of a burden on your team

Alla känner apan, men apan känner ingen. Translation: Everyone knows the monkey, but the monkey knows no one. Meaning: Those that stick out are often both well-known and avoided. Mhm not sure I need to be avoided... Statistically you're better off IN my team than against it ps. I know some Swedish people and I been told it's clearly an insult. But coming from you, I'll take it as a compliment