mtm78

Damnit not enough likes... WG y u no gib moar likes

http://forum.worldofwarships.eu/index.php?/topic/35743-how-to-report-a-bug/ Welkome to the forums zikazika1, in order to get the information needed to squash this bug the developers would likely require a little bit more info.

I forwarded the request, but I got no influence from there onwards

I think they will say we can use the normal existing rooms for that without any issues, but maybe I can convince them to rename one of the existing rooms...

Dev's reading this topic don't have enough actual data. Read the topic I linked earlier, unless you already made a ticket with support and provided them with the necessary information.

Yup. I also had many occasions where ships suddenly sprung to live after accusations of botting where spoken in chat, makes me want to believe there are not only 'bots' but also 'account farms' where people try to level up by leeching xp for many accounts at once. Sad thing is, it's almost impossible to proof. I mean, they could be mouth breathing monkeys irl matching their ingame performance.

Playing with MK atm.... edit: I sold Mogami after the captain skill changes..

Indeed, so, what's next? Waiting for someone to give an insight in the player distribution regarding these ships might have us grow beards

That is sadly an assumption and not more then that. It's entirely plausible that actually more good people buy these ships as there are 'green' people playing them, the only one who could tell is someone who has access to all the numbers ( RichardNixon might have something on this, though I obviously meant WG ).

wait, no pitchforks and tar and feathers... jk man, I agree, the other cruisers should be buffed to be in range of the premiums, but I also need to add that a lot of people can't even get decent results with these so called 'pay2win' ships so it's not like it is an instant win button. There is still skill involved, and more so people who buy these premiums and who are pulling up their stats are most likely also the one's performing in the upper brackets in all their other ships ( kuch kuch ). So to be able to properly judge the performance, it should be correlated with those playing the ships and not just with the other tier 8's. I have 74% wr in my Arkansas Beta, which is a worse Wyoming, does that mean the Arkansas Beta is horrendously overpowered, or does it mean I am a 'very lucky player'?

This is however not a reason to exclude them from certain battles, but it should indicate that the other tier VIII cruisers could perhaps need some love <3 Excluding premium ships from these 'events' is going about it the wrong way.

1. MK is simply the best AAA platform cruiser on tier VIII. 2. Atago is the only tier 8 CA with a heal ability, and with captain skills and equipment can play like a DD ( stealth torp all the things ). Mogami vs Atago imo Atago should win. But as you say: I bought these ships, and I would NEVER buy anything again if they suddenly would limit what I could do with the ships I bought. I think this 'rumor' is just utter bullexrement btw, maybe even just started to 'test the waters' on how WG would react.

Uhm even if you not missing what he wrote, you're still wrong as it's 139mm not 134

Uhm you can't sell ARP ships man, you trolling?

The only thing I would like to add is that everyone on ts and in my division always calls me noob

Haruna is love, Haruna is live... I told WG they're doing it wrong with giving Hiei the captain skills

Hey I can pick multiple ships as required, just have to know which one as I actually have to buy them

I use that site almost daily to track per ship and overall performance, it's a good way to see where I need to improve DD exp is mostly gained by capping, your avg. damage potential is usually lower than a similar tier CA or BB ( let alone CV ). And Tashkent isn't that stealthy, I guess you would contest cap's with IJN DD's and only can get the xp boost if you're successful in driving them out ( for which you usually need coordination with others ).

My judgement has to be made on the information available at the time, don't think I should feel bad Btw, even your last 50 day stats are not that much saying Taskent is so crap. 43 battles, 74% win rate, compared with your New Orleans 72 battles and 61% win rate. http://warships.today/player/516723937/eu/S4h3L

Coordination is the best part of this game, and afaik most good players will coordinate to ensure a victory. The 'aggressive patronizing' behavior is not be encouraged but I can understand how frustrating it is to see your allies doing things which are nonsensical and then also not responding to chat or responding with patronizing behavior on their own. And I don't agree -> About in game communication, well it's hard sometimes, people don't always speak English and some things like 'don't split up, there is power in numerical superiority' are not easily understood it seems. Still, even if one's allies don't play like one would like them to, it doesn't mean it's one's right to teamkill or flame them in chat. On the other hand, it's also a bit strange to defend people actively sabotaging their team's chances to win. I think the truth is usually somewhere in the middle?

But we don't know how it went, all we know is that he said to not go there, and only after being told that 'he always goes there' he said something about general performance/stats. We don't know, replay would give a clear picture but you and me both can be sure of anything right now. I've told people to not split off from the group in domination and concentrate on two caps, only to have them ignore me and call me noob, then getting killed and blaming the team for 'no support'. The moment someone calls me a noob, I alt-tab and enter their name and usually their sub 50% players and trust me I like pointing out their not as good as they think. Then they usually start with the name calling and 'your momma' comments. It's more often than not the bad players who are toxic, not the good one's.

So, your 63% Tashkent is worse than your 49% New Orleans? Yeah, I totally see the logic in that. Stats don't lie, the objective of the game is winning, if you win more in a certain ship it can't be 'worse' than another ship. Looking at your ships, your Kiev and Tashkent should be your go-to ships as you perform the best in them.

You realize you're talking to volunteers right? If you can do a better job, write your own guide and keep it updated. Your rudder shift time afaik stays the same but since you bleed a lot of speed you will also turn really slow.