mtm78

I thought it might be my mods like minimap or something, especially since Aslain said he didn't have time to test them for stability. Ran game in safemode, had one normal game and then it got even worse than it was before. Still people -> post your pingplotter files If the issue is WG servers -> WG might do something about it to help when next patch hits. If it's a transit provider -> WG might be able to pressure them into looking into the issue. Either way, without physical proof we can't expect anything to be done about it and frankly I am a bit sad this is a frequently reoccurring issue around patch day. ps -> last five minutes were pretty ok, 3% packet loss would be playable ( still some stuttering but it's pretty spread out for me so it wouldn't be complete frame freezes / rubber banding ). edit: packet loss on transit provider node is now less than <1% measured over the last 5 minutes, game should be playable again

I live in neverland

It is showing last 60 seconds, packet loss still 10% for me

I am quite interested in people posting a pingplotter screenshot. https://eu.wargaming.net/support/kb/articles/461 How can a pingplotter report be usefull https://eu.wargaming.net/support/kb/articles/50 How do I create a pingplotter report

Can you guys post a pingplotter screeny? Yup, stuttering like mad every x seconds and getting disconnects.

That node is 100% clean here, mine is one hop before. Those are the reasons why it's pretty much impossible to blame WG for it, seems the network congestion is happening before it even reached WG owned servers.

I am on ts with others who are playing, some have some issues but most seem to be aok Just wondering if hibernia networks node is because of my route to WG or if it's actually already WG owned

Yes, that is normal. My tier 5 Gremmy can stealth fire from 9.7km and I will hit your quite reliably from 13km unless you are evading well. And that is a DD... They are not cheating, they are just good at the game.

SO MUCH THIS! Off course, you can hide them when you're just 'so good it's only MM holding you back'. And you will say that, while winning less games then for instance... me.

I don't get it, why do these 60% wr plebs all seem to think their so special that MM has to put them back in their place or they would have, let's say... 65% win rate

Which is the true reason of this thread. I see your low tier BB's have a reasonable hit ratio, but your high tiers do not. From what distance are you engaging enemies ( and what enemies? And when? ). Do you have replays enabled? If so, post some of your latest BB games please, maybe others like me can help you play the game better.

Screenshot? Can't believe NA would screw up again

Sorry to be a party pooper, but john doe seeing that movie with the message: "here, maybe this will help you" might think it's 'average performance' (cwl). I saw the movie earlier btw, and whenever I hear/see people say it is a tier 8 cleveland I am dying a bit inside. It might have the same gun layout, but it's NOT a Cleveland. Cleveland can tank damage, it has one of the hardest to hit citadels in the game. MK on the other hand has the nickname Citadelovich.

It's not that helpful on it's own, infact it might even be giving people the wrong impressions

Ahh yeah because that video shows the average game for a MK right

Hey man you're right, MM is rigged and holding you back by placing you with 'next to worse players this game has to offer' and that is somehow proven by your awesome statistics!

Why are you flaming me?

CC is factually only correct for USN, and on forum it is never used outside of some purists posts. BC on the other hand is used in almost all discussions about ship classes.

Simple -> xvm is a> not publicly available at the very least so b> no one you will meet in battle is going to be using it bar c> the very very limited exception aside which is statistically totally irrelevant. You might meet someone who can alt tab to his second screen and type your name in the search bar of a 3rd party statistics tracking site. That is much more common.

[edited] You shouldn't hide them, it's nothing special anyway. Btw, nope I don't hide them. I also don't hide behind them in the face off a discussion about 'rigged' matchmaking XVM isn't needed to see someone's performance, why are you all so afraid of people seeing how *cough cough* exceptionally good *cough cough* you are?

I did when I saw his old nick on his YT channel, but how exactly is this proof of anything besides ^^. Btw, his win rate isn't that much higher than MY solo win rate, and lower then my solo + division win rate. How the hell does that proof anything again? Because? Because you like alu hat comments? Exactly what I expected from you, inability of going into a contextual discussion but hiding behind his 'performance'. Shall we just end this how we started it: hahahahahaha

So you accuse me of flaming when I say it's laughable that first you ( rightfully ) mention WG having said ( about another game btw.. ) that you might or might not be placed higher or lower in tiers in a given team based on your recent performance, and then you later try to extrapolate this is also the same for WoWs and suddenly it makes you play 'constantly next to worse players this game has to offer'. Yeah, I am totally flaming you when I say that is laughable at best Also nice how you seemingly don't have anything to say about the actual arguments but want to try and portray me as 'flaming' so you are morally excused to not go into the actual points ( you thought you made... ). Well done, I'm impressed.

My trollface was quite clear I hope. WG doesn't intent the 'bot' report option to be applied to less skilled players. Eventually I believe people will get perhaps more or less allowed reports based on how 'accurate' their reports are, but that's irrelevant for now and also just a feeling. 'plays poorly' is still one of my most used report options, it works reasonably well for blowing off some steam ( and tbh, it's not 'news' I think it's not a report with consequences anyway ).

Wait what, so all my 'plays poorly' reports are not giving them bad karma, I should use the other report options then