-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
I see many a Smolensk being played like selfish little damage whores. constantly thinking that it's him and 11 spotters for him. Those are generally the crappier players who got one and who think it's how it should be played, since now suddenly they can have 100k avg ( .... mhm I actually doubt this ) dmg but forget that they just farm it on BB's and all of their damage can be healed back so in effective damage, or in being an actual asset to their team, their contribution is far less. Dmg farming isn't always gud. Wait, reading the other posts, why am I even arguing here.... and with a reroll even *Typical Dunning Kruger in action, guy thinks it's the ship and not the player
-
Well rework is done you see, they don't 'need' the feedback anymore.... Yesterday Killian cheered me up, I got to shoot down his planes in a training room with Huanghe and yeah yeah the AAA on it is nice... but the only way I can keep dodging those is by constantly turning with the planes.... imagine doing that with 11 other players in the enemy team. But hey, no need to talk about that, it's not like it matters.
-
You know what, that offer to help you in a training room, yeah how about nope. No 'guy', I quoted a post from someone else who mentioned your hit ratio, stop playing victim you absolute ....... This constant ffin whining you're being stat shamed, please man stop it it's making me want to put you on ignore. No one stat shamed you, YOUR HIT RATIO IS PATHETIC PERIOD. Facts, not shaming. In a thread YOU MADE ABOUT AIMING. Now dare to bring up again how mentioning your HIT RATIO is stat shaming you? And it wasn't even me, yet you constantly cry and whine more and more about how you're such a pathetic victim. Hey you know what, go listen to a Nate Diaz interview, then imagine it's me talking to you. How bout that? /ignore
-
Reflecting on year 4 of WoWS - What have you liked/disliked?
mtm78 replied to Admiral_H_Nelson's topic in General Discussion
I know we're not supposed to quote on other people's lists, but we don't have the proper post reaction emote. Your reaction makes me sad. Sad that people are quitting this game over a single class interaction with the rest of the game. So while I gave your list a thumbs up, I just wanted to clarify it's not because I agree or because I like it, but because it makes me sad. -
need some advise on whether I should keep grinding Japanese BBs
mtm78 replied to TrangleC's topic in General Discussion
My edit wasn't done, that quote was before reading more of this thread. No I couldn't be bothered, Gruber already did in relation to your hit ratio which was the only relevant stat to that thread. I checked your profile later since I was looking for other indicators, like hit ratio and survival ratio combination, got distracted and didn't bother. Stop making assumptions. I don't know you as a person so I have no opinion of you as one. And as a player there is simply not enough info to say anything either. Everyone started somewhere. I did worse as you did when I had your battle count I'm pretty sure. But I got this weird thing that if people say I suck, I actually look at myself and go: mhm ye I do, let's fix that! Just like you seem to want, otherwise you're not here making topics. Anyway, I will give some generic advice: with 200 battles there is a lot to learn, aiming is one of those things which need practice. I had a long break and since I've come back I'm pretty sure I lost a few % myself just because those little automation's are all gone. I can't remember exactly the arcs on my ships, it takes time to judge all the different new content in the game ( speed - leading / armor scheme - where do you aim ). Luckily aiming is easy to practice, fill up a training room with bots and have at them. And if you have someone watching with you, they can hopefully correct mistakes and/or give some pointers. The other thing, map awareness / situational awareness is not something you can practice. You can get better at it, but if you don't 'have it' it's really hard to develop it. The thing which would really help there is playing in division with someone who 'has it' and who is during the battle able to tell you what's happening, allowing you to judge the game and perhaps see the indicators yourself in time. If you do this on your own, sadly the game doesn't really give proper feedback about what is a good course of action in certain situations and what not, so it's easy to pick up bad habits ( if you want to max XP gain, sometimes risking something to gain an advantage leading to a more possible victory is putting that at risk ). Anyway, most of the people around here are actually friendly and willing to help anyone as long as the questions are thought through and the person isn't accusing everyone and the game for not agreeing with their own realities ;) Gruber wasn't statshaming you, he was pointing something out in relation to your own thread/question. And btw, hit ratio works the same for everyone, so if you need to ask me if I know how dispersion works, yeah I do. It works the same for me as it does for you, and in each individual salvo there will be variation. But in X amount of games, your shot distribution should roughly be the same as mine, so there is some RNG involved but it's mostly about your aim. Take care, add my name in game if you want to do that training room someday, and please stop making assumptions. -
Who do you think you're talking to? And yet you came here claiming aiming was 'to easy' but still 'also to hard, since I don't do any real damage'. See the irony? People like me? Mhm, let's not get into how insulting you're trying to be ( I think it's laughable but hey I got a thick skin boy ), but all I did is support Gruber who just pointed out a simple fact: your hit ratio is bad. And this thread is about aiming, which YOU MADE. See the relation. This isn't about agreeing or disagreeing, this is about SIMPLE FACTS. Stop trying to be the little victim. Who's weaponizing stats you absolute fear mongering ...... ? Your hit ratio sucks, and thus your damage sucks. Those are just facts, related to your thread you made, and which you got replies for trying to educate you. Yes they have, you don't seem to understand what is being told though and with your pathetic attitude I am not going to repeat them for you. Who the heck told you that you snowflake, people been trying to give advice I even offered some of my free time to see if we could fix you in a training room. *edit: yeah you got me... I told you to stop grinding IJN BB's... then I read page 2 and 3 and edited the post to include the offer to work on that feeling you say you have that it's frustrating when you don't hit what you want. As I told you in the other thread, stop making assumptions about people you don't know.
-
need some advise on whether I should keep grinding Japanese BBs
mtm78 replied to TrangleC's topic in General Discussion
Alright, let’s give this a go then. Aiming can be thought, it is just not easy since we can’t see your POV while trying to give you pointers. If if you want, we could do some training room sessions with stationary and moving bots. Not that I am a unicum bb player, but my Kongo’s seem to behave ;) -
Lmao.... stat shaming? They been nice to you, your hit ratio is absolute dog poo yet you com here telling us you think it’s to easy.. as to your other thread, aiming Is an acquired skill. I am not interested in lengthy texts and back and forth, if you want we can do a training room and see if it’s possible to improve that hitratio. people been trying to explain mechanics to you but. One or two shells from a salvo is BAD, You’re playing your ships from way to long range it sounds. Just because you have range doesn’t mean you should use it. And as to how and why... lieut_Gruber explained that as well.
-
My 1 year anniversary and a (mostly) fond farewell
mtm78 replied to Bindolaf_Werebane's topic in General Discussion
Do you actually know the demographics, 50% wr was not the average last time I seen it.. Median != average -
Try it, @Sub_Octavian .. But yeah EU forums are ... meh let's not go there I wasn't around, so idk..
- 178 replies
-
- Consumables
- Hotkeys
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
My 1 year anniversary and a (mostly) fond farewell
mtm78 replied to Bindolaf_Werebane's topic in General Discussion
Don't hope to much, it hurts when they get shattered ( see signature for how much 'hoping' will give you ). -
Hey I am just trying to get used to the line already yeah :P I knew Fanta would be a step back in gun's with only advantage even better speed.
-
I'm at tier 7 :P I do play it like a DD, 6.6km iirc isn't that bad, I just make sure I'm not the only DD.... since when mrb is down I get outgunned by basically IJN DD's. Also not 100% sure if I would like this as full on VMF replacement, I like being able to rush in support of my spotter DD and just apply massive dpm for a short time, it's the novel thing which makes the line more fun to play. Playing like medium/long range light cruiser is only the goal when the enemy DD's been sunk ( imo ).
-
My 1 year anniversary and a (mostly) fond farewell
mtm78 replied to Bindolaf_Werebane's topic in General Discussion
Nah not really it's not that black and white. My avg dmg is lower as my win rate would indicate, not because I got carried in my previous 5k games ( let's not count the last few since I returned... ) but because I applied that dmg to the right targets. You can farm dmg on BB's with anything which can burn them, but doing that same dmg to a DD will win you a lot more games. That's why DMG imho is quite useless as a measurement overall. Avg dmg per ship in comparison with server population is actually relevant, account avg dmg is not. A DD player or even a cruiser player which focuses on PTFO and ignores any potential dmg farm if it's not directly leading to increasing his chances to win is not worse as someone who does the opposite and is in the same team(s) :) -
My 1 year anniversary and a (mostly) fond farewell
mtm78 replied to Bindolaf_Werebane's topic in General Discussion
It's not only tanking, they also spot for me. <3 agressive bots a lot more as passive ( battleship ) players -
Is seems the summoning has not worked yet... Let's try it again @Tuccy @Crysantos @MrConway any chance of this finally getting some well deserved attention?
- 178 replies
-
- 5
-
-
- Consumables
- Hotkeys
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
I don't think I've ever broken 1m potential in them yet
-
My 1 year anniversary and a (mostly) fond farewell
mtm78 replied to Bindolaf_Werebane's topic in General Discussion
I don't want to scare you @Redcap375 but that 47% is actually average and most bot accounts would reach 35% or something... What is worse is that there are human players with worse results.... yes, they are actually hurting their team by taking up a spot other maybe taken by a bot :D And avg dmg is the least important stat I check, dmg whoring is what kills this game already. -
They don't need to, they eat HE like it's their birthday cake ( I like my Vaq... it's a different playstyle and when it works it's very fun ).
-
Nah, I don't see FR DD's with 50mm plating on them. Also, I have a hard time dodging CV's in my Frenchies when speedboost is off. With it on they dodge like pro's but when it's down you're pretty much getting hit every strike... well I am ;)
-
My 1 year anniversary and a (mostly) fond farewell
mtm78 replied to Bindolaf_Werebane's topic in General Discussion
I checked his avg wr which was 47-48%, and yea I think this was the most populated range in the distribution charts -
Mouse that COULD automatically double-click legal?
mtm78 replied to MarcoGn97's topic in General Discussion
Because WG is very good in informing people of features -
My 1 year anniversary and a (mostly) fond farewell
mtm78 replied to Bindolaf_Werebane's topic in General Discussion
tldr, I notice you complain about getting stomped to often, I checked your account, you're an average player. Don't see a problem need addressing, moving on o7 -
Mouse that COULD automatically double-click legal?
mtm78 replied to MarcoGn97's topic in General Discussion
Any KB or mouse currently is capable of macro's even the cheap stuff I got. WG rules state that anything which automates actions otherwise done by user input is considered to be illegal afaik, but I've never heard of WG banning people for setting their single click left mouse button to a double click. It's more like, and then esp with tanks, if you set up macro's which first select your repair and then select which component you want to repair. But heck I think that's also ages ago. Guess for an official answer you have to ask someone who actually knows how the rules are being applied atm... -
Well they saw the CV's and were like...
