mtm78

And every time someone cries about RN, WG extends the time they are not implemented with 1 week. Guess we'll see them in 2058

This is a community driven event from SGWA, sponsored by WG

You mean when I ragequited the division and suicided because 'playing conservatively' was not giving me any damage

Good new ships attract players, but having good ships which when combined with high skill point captains which make some ships even more powerful and you get the opposite effect. You won't keep new people playing if they have the same ship but get > 2km less range ( how many tier III captains will have AFT other then the one's who play the tier for reasons other than progression to the next tier up? ) Also, good new ships can also lose existing players who don't want to feel pressured into grinding a new line because powercreep made the line's they already unlocked less attractive. I don't think there is powercreep btw, personally I don't even like the tier VI which in Flamu's hands ( and according to his opinion ) is the only candidate for being in possession off to many strong points and not enough weak points.

You lose ROF and dmg per round, but with AFT and BFT you get almost the same ROF as with the big guns, but you gain a lot of range ( with a still pretty good arc imo ). The upgraded guns in combination with a high skilled captain make this a certified seal clubber imo. Which as you note is strange, as it goes against the latest captain skill changes which were intended to prevent 'seal clubbing' effect of high skill captains on low tier ships compared with new players playing on that tier just to progress to the next rank.

It is not playable for me, I keep losing control or getting frame jumps at exactly the wrong moments. Wondering if other people are having the same issue at that particular node? http://78.152.55.154.ipaddress.com/ -> owned by Hiberia networks. I am sad, really want to play the game right now

So you really really believe that hanging back will wins you more games? If so, go for it Winning is so much more fun them loosing, I wish everyone would play to win. Like the two Clevelands yesterday when I way in my Gremmy going for a cap where a Mutsuki showed up with 2/3rd of the team behind him. I told them to kill the DD first, you know, because it wins games, they refused even told me I was stupid. So I withdrew, they died and while I ffin suicided because of the crap they were talking I still ended in the top of the team while having done nothing. And the Cleveland were telling me how I should play to win, while they don't even have the basic understanding that the enemy team had few DD's, it was a domination match, they were in cruisers, they had an allied DD spotting for them, THEY NEED TO PRIORITIZE THE DD so we get the vision advantage. Guess that was to much thinking on their part, or well, maybe they just don't like playing for the victory. They rather accuse me off not getting in a gunfight with a DD spotting me with 2/3rd of their cruisers ~13km away. Someone there also claimed you get good stats by 'letting the others do the hard work'. But hey, if you want to play to win, give me a shout in game and I'll gladly division up with you. Maybe that will show you that if people hang back and let others 'do the work' and then win games, those people doing the hard work would also wins the game. Which is kind of weird on it's own, as 'doing the work' and 'winning the game' sounds pretty similar don't you think?

One of the 'balancing' aspects of Imperator Nicolai I is that is has the worst torpedo protection of the tier IV BB's. Bulge armor placement is also not the same on all ships.

^^

Imo experimenting with giving CA/CL higher torpedo detection ranges would be something worth considering. It would make CA's more valuable in a close proximity screening role as well as allowing to 'hunt' DD's better.

I see your signature and it indicates there would be MANY situations where what those things you said other were expecting from you would have actually been better then what ever it was you yourself thought you should be doing at the time. Sadly this whole weekend was full with people 'who knew better'. Horrible experience.

You're thinking of Loran aren't you

I think it was supposed to be a replacement, and that something went wrong.. Either way, can't you manually dismiss her?

Alright time to close this.

yes you do, does it say 'WG' in his account description? If not...

Aslain a WG employee... Btw xChat -> http://xchat.org/ Has nothing to do with mods in WoWs.

Even before the buffs some people were performing well with her. Just, a lot of people just bought a tier 8 CA without knowing how to play it imo and that skewed statistical performance.

In your conclusion I did wonder about something, as you call out the 'lack of anti air' on a Kirov which has the best anti air for tier 5 ( better then Murmansk ). Those 100mm DP guns have 6km range iirc with the captain skills and quite decent dps ( for the tier ).

Furutaka with final upgrade = Aoba. Furutaka has the lowest average damage at tier 5, I blame the low DPM ( it was buffed a lot since I played it though so I know it's already a lot better ). WG should perhaps buff rpm even further to give her some more dpm. As to buffing USN, the only places where VMF has the advantage in an 'escort' role is tier 5 and tier 9, not enough reason to warrant a cry for a total rebalance. Kirov, I don't think she is OP but she is 'punishing' if enemy gives you broadside. I citadelled tier 4 battleships with her from distance because they sailed broadside in straight lines, the guns are very nice. But the ship has worse armor than GE CA's, turns like a battleship and is visible from 14 km away. You melt under enemy fire, Furutaka is much much more durable. I do wonder how people can be so judgemental about a ship they never sailed with and probably haven't even met in randoms ( much, at least, since the amount being tested is not that high you would constantly run into them ). Please, go watch Flamu's video on the VMF cruisers, I highly respect his opinion on them.

And what should this rebalance look like then?

You're lying in every post you make. Where did Flamu ever say anything you claim he did?

All ARP Kongo's come in elited configuration.....

Yeah IJN has lower surface detectability and less AAA so it's logical to use them more in a DD support role then BB escort role ( though you can still give AAA when needed ). You can use AP at most BB's if you're close enough because the bow and stern are usually lightly armored enough ( especially on the all or nothing armor scheme USN BB's ). 203mm cruiser guns can citadel lower tier BB's which are giving flat broadsides even. ps. -> http://warships.today/player/527383484/eu/Penguin_mafia You're far from a scrublord All your average damage's are above server average, as well as most of you win ratio on your individual ships.

Lying is a bad habit VonPletz I am to tired to do it for all the others, but your lies are even more tiresome. edit: Another lie? Really man, why you so prone on getting your lies pruned from this thread?