mtm78

If you think Ibuki has good guns, wait till you get Zao <3 If I didn't dislike the current meta at tier X I could easily see that being my main ship atm.

Doesn't Mogami 203 now outrange Myoko 203 slightly? They said so in the patch notes afaik ( though I sold Mogami after AFT changes, I now got a MK to burn stuff at 19km ). Also not sure about the armor and AAA.

If a DD has 5% fire chance per shell, the -7% skill reduces that to 5 x 0.93 = 4.65%. So yeah... statistically is seems relatively useless

Limited plane reserves != limited ammo, if they don't lose planes they can keep sending sorties out without running out of torpedoes, bombs or fuel for the planes As said above, carriers burn for more damage, and iirc also have a lower fire resistance ( which with for the most part wooden flight decks makes perfect sense ), and that is why it was implemented that carriers can't get detonated. But meh, how many other ships can you reliably citadel with HE rounds

Had a Fubuki which team killed a Warspite in my team, didn't respond to questions why, didn't apologize. Wasn't at start of the match so I am not 100% sure it was intentional but I did notice a lot of 'demeaning' remarks towards Spite's and Torpoid's so I wouldn't be surprised if it was some guy having a bit of penisenvy and had to take out his mom not wanting to buy him a shiny premium. Warspite's reaction -> 'Sigh'

Isn't it a sign of such a parameter because different ships turn better at different engine settings/speeds ( I mean doesn't that imply there is some drag taken into account due to hull shape/length vs water resistance at various speeds )?

Which doesn't make sense really if you consider the amount of ammunition carried ( bombs and torpedoes ), though probably a lot harder to set off then a magazine of propellant charges it would give one hell of a boom nonetheless

I was having a 'slight' headache.. because my neighbour from two stories down was having a party with the [censored] music so [censored some more] loud I couldn't concentrate on the game as my kids kept waking up. Right before we started that battle they [edited a lot] turned it up even and I said I needed to rush in and make it a short game because I wanted to tear someone's head off... I spent ten minutes banging at the [really, much self censorship going on here] door without any of the [you guessed it] people inside either hearing it or paying any attention to it. Short to actually kicking in the door I resorted to taking the pussy way out and called 'the authorities' who were off course way to busy for something as bland as some domestic disturbance on a saturday night and as such I was up till 1 in the morning sitting in my chair with headphones on and feeling the bass through my feet... I hope I played better in the game with LetsRockAndRoll then I did against scrappygwilly

Ye, sadly human nature shows time and time again that morals are mostly talked about and not that much else

Which has been said to come to WoWs 'soon' as well The system was very lenient and they said as much, and they don't like it either so it will be made harsher.

Same here, waiting on a discount, I already have a Sims

Ye, I saw that one coming

But how would that be fair, because he noticed it he get's a discount while everyone who bought a Warspite can have bought it because of the wrongly advertised ability

Which is why it would help if 'assisted' damage was in the game, to make it worth more to actually push enemy DD's and have them damaged by the hopefully supporting cruisers behind you. See above. And yes DD fights are more impactful on the battle because DD's give vision control ( in absence of a good CV player which can also provide this when needed ) and are the fastest class in the game and as such capable of late game hole plugging / exploitation.

You make sense, and I agree on most levels it makes no sense. Mainly because perhaps T8-T9-T10 BB's don't differ that much in play style ( Amagi vs North Cal perhaps the most due to BC vs BB, and Yamato vs Montana due to turret layout and armor model ). But, if you would make a guide for DD's tier 8 to 10, each nation plays so different it would perhaps make more sense to break it up into multiple guides. ps. If you think you really should break up the guide in a general part and a IJN specific part, it would be 'easier' to amend it with an additional USN section so in that sense I myself wouldn't mind you taking the liberty to do so on your own.

They made new one's then, as it was the only one with capital F and a password. Maybe I can ask WG to close the fakes..

3. I can haz discount on a sheep I already have? I have all tier 8 premiums already 5. Hands of my sheep!

I see more cruisers who start in positions to support screening DD's, only to see their DD's being [censored] cowards who only try to stealth torp or ambush even in low tier USN DD's and thus have to fall back because the enemy DD's are actually screening properly and their getting focused by the entire enemy team, then I see DD's falling back because their cruisers are getting pushed back by the enemy BB's. Either way, the problem is more teamwork related then anything else if you ask me.

Because, if you exchange doubloons for credits and get XYZ then you can always blame XYZ but for losing real money but that is not how it works. I know no one who frequently ( or ever.. ) exchanges doubloons for in game credits. That is not an argument I expect to see being used, because those doubloons are better spend at a premium ship which will earn you much more credits over time then a conversion. Though, as WG does indeed offer it to you as an option, I guess it's a properly valid argument to make. I am not picking on you, well not intentionally anyway. Your arguments are somewhat easy to react to, if you just said ( like everyone else ) that WG should deal with the TK issue more harshly, that we all agree on. That you don't care if people are punished and only care about the money you lose, why do you expect that to be relevant? Those people doing it won't stop doing it because it costs you real money, infact I bet they will even ramp it up knowing you're spending actual real life money which they can take away from you. It's the punishment aspect which is going to stop it, that and that alone. You said developers never say anything about the issue, when infact they do, then you say that it doesn't mean anything in order to keep your arguments intact, which you follow up with claiming WG makes money from team killing which is bogus, because in game credits don't represent actual currency ( EXCEPT for the 0.01% which converts doubloons to credits ). ps. Supertesters do not get paid for their services.

Yes, they can do that because off actually having good torps ( esp. Fletcher ) but this is the cause of the shima infestation, they are not being hunted by those supposed to hunt them. Something has to change to entice people to play gunboat DD's in their intended way..

This isn't about fun, it's about being useful for your team. USN DD's mimicking IJN playstyle are not the intended play style, so if you feel forced into it the radar addition isn't working out as intended.

Check his post history, I wouldn't waste too much oxygen there..

Fenks WG, now I got a reason to use Haruna captain in the other ARP ships until I unlock the 16pt Hiei captain

Not as much as Imperator