-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Exploiting fail divisions to be high tier
mtm78 replied to EralionArkanar's topic in General Discussion
Umikaze main problem is lack of speed on higher tiers, it is to slow to properly relocate and can't run away from an enemy CL if being pushed, let alone a gunboat DD. That is what makes her reliant on stupid enemies who let her shine even in higher tier matches ( and from my own experience, there are plenty of those around.. but when meeting a competent team the possibilities degrade quickly ). -
Yes I do, first battle it's fine second one I get it as well but if you go to settings -> controls and untick - apply and tick - apply show team panels it resets itself so it's good again ( for that match ). I have it with different icon set's and both hp bar options.
-
Exploiting fail divisions to be high tier
mtm78 replied to EralionArkanar's topic in General Discussion
And still he is absolutely 100% right, and your anecdotal 'evidence' of the contrary is not worth much other then you saying you been very lucky -
But, isn't that a feature Seriously, Atlanta love sounds like a good plan ( though my DD's won't like it that I know already ). Yubari <3 also sounds good Not adding rewards to team battles on the short term - ......... .don't know what to say, if they don't want the competitive players to play team battles, this is a good way to ensure this won't. The biggest complaint is that it bleeds signal flags. Why can something as utterly stupid imo as ranked battles get rewards while something where the players have actual control over who they play with are being treated as second rank players?
-
As I am told by some Alpha testers, you're absolutely 100% right.
-
Exploiting fail divisions to be high tier
mtm78 replied to EralionArkanar's topic in General Discussion
You believe this how? Why? Which tangible data do you base it on? How large is that dataset? Is it unambiguous? It's nice to tell people you feel a certain way, I am sure other people are really interested in those feelings. It would be even nicer if those feelings would be substantiated with some backing -
Ow I love the vid's wouldn't have made the thread otherwise, I just been so busy I wasn't even able to keep bumping the thread on each new release. Btw, did you try to reenact his approach to sinking carriers? I did, it was glorious ( that time that it actually worked perfectly.. forget about the others ofc ). DD parked right next to CV: Hi there carrier! Can we be friends?
-
off topic: You should see the one with the 12 gauge shotgun and the aquarium ;)
-
Ow I don't really post every time a new video is out, it would make me feel weird pushing a strangers channel so actively. But, when I made this thread the guy had like 20 followers, think that has picked up a lot Now, if I see a really funny one I will bump this one, in the mean time I hope everyone feels free to link new video's in the thread.
-
In game search has been 'hit and miss' since always anyway. Can't count the times I'm on TS with someone who is offline in WoWs according to MY client while they can see me, or vice verse. But, there are 'promo' accounts which don't have a profile associated with them afaik, they are usually perfectly recognisable ( eg event name and a number ).
-
Best way would be 1 day forum RO's for every whine made in an topic which is not per title about RN. Yes, that would mean nothing would change as most of the whiners have limited input on this forum, they either only whine about RN being needed for this game to survive ( first time I heard that was in CBT... ), RU BIAS, GE hate, 'bad' Paris office and the list goes on and on. So, you give those whiners a 1day RO for whining about the same things over and over and over, and it changes nothing because the next day they will continue the sobbing and no other input to this forum is lost ( because there wasn't any to begin with ).
-
Lol sorry guys, didn't check the section
-
You're correct, it was said, I think by Tuccy.
-
Because there are so many clueless brainless players around, that without this option would sue WG for compulsory faceplanting damaging their desks ( not to mention the poor keyboard stuck between forehead and desk every five minutes ). And looking for a 'teamkilling' report option? You don't play many WG games do you? They don't give this option, support also has no option to make a report and if you do they will give this reply: WoWs has an automated system tracking team damage, this system is working as intended and 'yada yada yada rest assured yada yada yada will be punished automatically yada yada yada'. And with the recent changes to how 'harsh' the system is, this actually has a LOT of merit atm.
-
Did you guys already read this -> [ edit: link removed, nothing to see here ] ?
-
It should. Btw, just make a copy of the original and go wild with editing and use a replay to see results. That is how I came to my fontsize and x/y offset
-
No option for that I'm afraid, the 'color transform' is probably for last know position ( that is what Aslain said; there is only the option to set that color ). Though the name 'color transform' doesn't look like it does that. I should perhaps try and find the original thread and look around there but this stopgap mod is good as is for me anyway ( for now, I want detection circles back ofc ;) ).
-
Exploiting fail divisions to be high tier
mtm78 replied to EralionArkanar's topic in General Discussion
tier 6 ship, with tier 4 carrier will get into tier 8 match with an enemy CV tier 4 pulled in as well. This I seen with my very own eyes, and more then once. So the only 'evidence' there can be imo is a developer stating that the MM does indeed work in a way that mirroring will allow other ships to always be top tier. The only thing taking a low tier CV in your division would do is make sure at least ONE of the enemy carriers will be of equally low tier. edit: Anyone stating that they observed otherwise, please provide prove. The way I explained is the official way the MM works as given by the developers at this time (iirc), the burden of proof lies with the people claiming they are wrong. -
I hope the mods will split off all the wining and crying going on, but until then...
-
Exploiting fail divisions to be high tier
mtm78 replied to EralionArkanar's topic in General Discussion
Your personal observations do not match my own, but as I also realize personal observations are not conclusive I will leave the option open that I could be wrong and my observations are flawed. If they are not, this 'exploit' just does not work. -
Out of all the battleships, you picked Trollorado to prove a point about accuracy?
-
Reported for using Klingon in English section Also, kaaskoppen ftw
-
Hello. Is this a game with less focus on stats than WoT?
mtm78 replied to Yakito's topic in Newcomers' Section
E-50m would still attract attention, it's not like people don't expect people who are good at tonks to suck at sheeps. The problem is that then people comment on 'hiding stats, you're either terribad or uniscum' I'm against hidden profiles, but I am also against verbal abuse ( some banter is normal in online gaming though ). The good thing is thought that there is no in game statistics mod atm. -
I edited my quote
-
Color for hidden ships is exactly what they asked about, and the visibility toggles are there as well. ( allies, enemies, hidden ).
