mtm78

If there are so few, why are they so problematic that they should be confined to a separate queue?

2 posts 38 battles and a profound opinion on how WG deals with 'cheaters' edit: just to make sure, where did you gather anything is based on user reports? If you paid attention you'd realize how stupid that remark actually is even if you're just trying to troll

Allied_Winter, on 24 May 2016 - 09:30 AM, said: So bottom line: Guidelines are needed. And if WG EU decides that a certain mod is to be considered unfair, than I'm sure, that most players using said mod, will be happy to oblige and uninstall it or face the dire consequences : trollface: QFT

So you admit you knew nothing once as well, and you learned it 'the hard way' while being a nuisance for your team ( since you hadn't learned yet ), yet you still want new players to be instantly better then you were? Somethings fishy, and it's in the sea this time

QFT. If a BB player find me next to him in a CA, it's because I'm checking is 'everyone's aboard'. If I see moving guns but a BB which refuses to close more then 19km to the enemy, I will happily leave the fecker to dry and spend my time elsewhere. The main reason CA's play passive is because enemy BB's don't and allied BB's do.

Sad perhaps, but better get it out of the way so we can move on

Which is almost redundant to mention and also really easy to 'filter' out as WG API also gives a 'last active' field so people can be processed based on that.

Threshold depending on recent allied vs enemy damage, details not disclosed for obvious reasons ( same as with WoT )?

https://warships.today/player/501112274/eu/mtm78 ( Notice the lil row of 'tab buttons' ? ) Wargaming already seperates the solo and division games, just not on their own portal ( the portal afaik will be extended perhaps someday, but the info is already available to 3rd party through WG API since WG does store it ). edit: As to separate 'league' for division and non division players, I do NOT like the idea. It would fragment the playerbase even more, and the impact of 3 man divisions isn't that big ( my solo wr is 59%, my 'all in' wr is 64% ). Maybe when WoWs has a bigger playerbase, but certainly not 'soon'

I saw Hurz on division on enemy team with a MK and a carrier, I let him to my team and went the other way, our team didn't like Hurz because he played really well and almost got as much XP in his defeat as I did as top xp in the winning team

This is a very old discussion which been had on this forum since before I was around, trust me when I say that there is no 'other side' in this. Simply because one does not have a crystal boll, one can't know what happens in the next two minutes your torpedo's can be in the water. That ally who is in front might not be 'in the way' now, but he might have to turn because of enemy torpedo's ( for which he will be looking out for btw, unlike 'friendly torpedo's' ) or because he comes under to heavy fire / is at a very disadvantageous angle. The guy in front simply has the right to react as he sees fit without having to worry about people torping from behind them unless it is certain it is safe ( because communication ) so do not endanger your allies. If you want to contest the right to endanger your allies, you will soon find they will no longer put their ships between you and the enemy and you might actually have to fight on the front line yourself for a change Maybe even with the 'harmless' second line torps you seem to think are 'fine' Because, frankly, friendly torpedo's aren't. Friendly, I mean

Yeah like OP's post was anything to actually discuss, pffffff

Ignore the troll, claims Aslain and Proships got his brother and him banned it's almost to silly to laugh about it as he is just trying to scare people. disclaimer, I use Aslain and haven't been banned for it, it you use Aslain and get banned don't complain to me ( instead complain to WG, I will do the same )

quoted post removed I'm autistic, got anything to say to me in particular or to my autistic son? ps unless you're in the top 3 percentile I'm not dumber then you Imo this mod isn't breaking anything, you can get the same info through the smoke coming from the smoke stacks. Though, there is a small delay there compared to if the lights change depending on engine settings and not actual speed, I am not sure how 'beneficial' it would be. It's nowhere near as impactful as aim mod's or aim predictors. ps; et all, I know I just done it as well ( not just just, but just above.. ) but please, just stop feeding the troll

Salute your admiral, you Luitenant you

[edited]

Bye, don't let the door hit you on the way out

The Foolish one is almost never the one 'turning into friendly torps'

Wouldn't it be an option to turn of scaling, run the installer and then turn scaling back on?

Brown(ish) / black(ish) people unite, show the world we are not cheaters and this clear color bias sets a wrong example <seriously>Now this is good news indeed</seriously>

I did sink a Fuso with St Louis in division with a Phoenix... granted the Fuso was the stereotype battleship captain but hey But let's just agree that it's called a 'fail division' with a reason, and exceptions don't change this any bit?

It IS new, hence the many people suddenly noticing it's a lot more strict then it was before.

It should Sorry for the inactivity, personally I haven't been playing much due to some various circumstances but you can always drop by the forums or the in game 'SGWA' chat channel. I should be running on all gears again soon, so don't despair

Try turning with Umikaze and see how much speed she bleeds compared with Isokaze? Unless you turn ( every once in a while ) you might run into an island or map border No seriously, straight line top speed is not the thing which puts them apart.

Did I comment early in the game on where everyone was going? If so, I was doing ok-ish in the end but since I was the last one iirc we still lost? Iirc I finally had a > 100k game again in Impy so it was slightly fun even in the loss ).