mtm78

So why ask me to go there I avoid it as the pest. Yes. I already have CQE with Kiev, thank you. But like I said, usually DD's have high enough ROF to not need manual control over secondaries. It would be a buff, you want to increase effectiveness of secondaries so in situations where you depend on this increased effectiveness you can easier defend yourself. This is a direct buff. Even when locked out for two main battery reload cycles, some battleships have secondaries consisting of two or more light cruisers strapped to their side. So yes, it sounds to me like a buff. I also don't see a need. Both for manual secondaries IN THIS GAME, as well as making more changes to make BB life easier.

I corrected Sun who thought DFens was agreeing with him, I don't need to have public games in GK to do that. ps I actually was in ST when German BB's were being developed so it's not like I have no experience at all you know.... not that you need that to be able to read and understand statistical indicators. Who are you again kiddo?

and? I also was in top 5% of games played during closed testing, been part of ST for a long time and have contributed to this game and community in ways you're probably not aware off. But hey, my post count is more important as my arguments right.

See that is the difference between me and you, I don't need more games in them to know I can believe what other people I trust tell me. People who you hardly can accuse of having no experience with the class. Also, I'm not sure how my spectacles would be rose tinted, I sucked at playing CV's ( hence me not bothering my team with me being in such a class.. outside of some plane kill farming for a campaign ). Indeed! So I am allowed to discuss the fact that for 99% of the playerbase going in a DD CV hunter division is not a valid strategy. And that doing so is toxic, and ruins the game for their team. To me you look like a hidden profile player.

How about you go, I like to make actual arguments here thank you Nor does this game needs to buff BB's more then are already See, it IS about BB's ( ow and perhaps German cruisers... ). Yeah weird right, how BB players can't control two sets of weapons and DD's can? Guess which class WG attributes the least ability to...

You need to compare per ship avg dmg not account. Someone who played old CV's will have a magnitude higher damage ratio's as a DD main. Anyway, look up your profile on wows numbers, and check which color your damage has per ship. The color codes are explained on the website, and you can compare between different sections of players ( top 50% 25% 5% 1% I think? ). Don't even think it's relevant, it's more relevant how high your average is and how consistent it is. All my record dmg on all my ships were fed by enemy teams misplaying. Damage is a tool, not a goal. That goal remains wining. edit: rephrase: having 80-100k avg but consistently doing 80-100k is much more important as having 50/50 games where you do 160k and the other game nothing. Consistency comes from situational awareness.

Ahh so it is about DD's? People where poinint out BB's are strong enough already, and that this would make them overpowered, but to you it's just 'DD complaining' right? Yeah figures. Anyway, go play that game then? I know why I am NOT playing that game, but maybe it suits you better?

When confronted with someone who is actually good and knows what he is talking about, this reaction is usually a sign of not having any arguments on your own. ps I loath DD divisions which think CV sniping is their job, I which I could team kill them for ruining the game for everyone in their team as they ignore their objectives and go at this like it's some single player game where his allies are all bots and not human players depending on THEM to do THEIR JOBS. As how to defend against CV's, well I am noticing my RU BB's shoot down a lot of planes while being able to tank a lot of their attacks.... unlike say cruisers and destroyers. And plox, those people coming up with Kid and Friesland... get your blinders off, those are premiums. Grozovoi was one the top AAA destroyers, silver that is. Go see how good that still is. REEwork is a total failure in all aspects except into fooling some people that it's not. Ow and in enforcing the World of Battleships tittle, since every other class suffered more from the REEwork. Yeah. And there is breathable air on Mars too, trust me I speak of experience You mean most are absolute trash and still get stuff done because of the crutches included in the class, and those who are not absolute trash can exploit those crutches to a point where every point REEwork tried to fix and which has importance on gameplay, is still present. All the while, REEwork has only increased BB survivability and lowered that of other classes. If you're going to make a thread like this to complain about other threads being negative about CV's, at least don't make toxic game ruining proposals. We don't need people in DD's to go hunt CV's, the few who could actually pull that off don't need a thread like this, and the crowd which might start trying after reading this is most likely not capable of it, hence just ruining the game for the rest of their team. I been in to many games already where DD's suicides uselessly thank you.

Problem with that is that DD's actually are supposed to play for objectives, BB.... yeah supposed to do stuff... but what * ( speaking from general playerbase ). If you look at the domination maps, BBs still go to their 'channels' where they think it's their job to brawl with enemy BB's, when their JOB actually is zone control and denying cruisers to hunt their destroyers... Ow wait, almost each game has 4-5 BB's and maybe one or two cruisers.. yeah.. idk... seems this game has bigger problems :) Yeah that's what I was going to say..

The only reason one wouldnt take aft would be gun bloom, and would only make sense when youre a die hard dd brawler, imho that is, and Blys has no issues landing napalm shells on cruisers and bb at Max aft range. I think aft still works for blys pretty well. Trying to specialize her into something she is not good at feels weird to me, the high alpha good fire starting abilities and decent ballistics made her an excellent herhasher at range where she could still evade a lot of incoming damage. Leningrad might be better at it, doesn’t mean Blys suddenly became bad at it.

Now instead of being useless, please offer some context to your link. Why should we care? Pointing to my post count when you’re the one making your own very contributing content look like the homework of a toddler with your formatting and asking for proper tourneys... making this thread because you think you’re the first to come up with this and it warrants not only adding to the suggestion thread but even it’s own thread because you’re to important to get ignored in the suggestions thread which is meant for this. Also, maybe you should have used your time better using search function as it probably shows that the request for proper tournament functionality is a lot older as your reroll account. But thanks for letting me up my post count, appreciated. I think this could get locked now unless you want to become productive.

No seriously, what is the context which should make that link relevant?

Meh both are knock offs of the real game

WoWs for IOS/Android tablets. Guess it's not

I'm just glad they fitin here and not in the CV rework thread... we need that one to stay open at least another 40 pages!

Can you give a direct reply this this -> I would really enjoy this option. If WG is actually proud of their product ( ) they should feel confident that a try before you buy option will result in more sales or am I wrong?

Yeah but we been doing it for far longer, and with often great success as well! It's only after Flambass did it on stream and all the plebs started trying to repeat it that it failed. Since yeah pushing to center does require your team to react, or the enemy to no react properly. But it can work and it can be 'fun'. Especially if start of the match every 4x% player in team chat is telling us we're bad players and we shouldn't do stupid things... You want to use his opinion on something as proof, so you kind of implied it. What would be better is an actual explanation / reasoning, other than 'they shoot dumb BB player charging cap so they can't shoot others' -> me: yeah... well.. stupid BB player is currently the only one spotted there so .... yeah his potential damage shouldn't really be rewarded in any way more as it is already. Sorry no, it just does not work like you want it to.

Meh how about people trying to be Flambass and charging through middle of Two Brothers in BB division It was actually way more fun when we forumites used to be the one's doing it, not some people trying to imitate a CC.

You think I agree with Flamu's opinion always, or that because something is his opinion it is proof of something? Man they call me a shipjesus fanboi.. Taking potential damage is NOT always good, not in the sense that it should be rewarded by an in game ribbon. Even if it would make the 45% JB player in my last match probably move forward more as 10km during the first 15 minutes of the match spamming his 'I need intelligence' at my poor kitakaze. Rewards should be given to things which matter, not to things which only matter when done right not when the system can't determine that. edit: btw, pretty sure shipjesus changed his mind a bit later on I'm sure it's in one of the vod's somewhere...

You feel repetitive, boy don't even start I am NOT talking about in game or out game, stop changing what I am telling you into something you think you have usable arguments for. Tanking is NOT ALWAYS GOOD. Period. Or proof me that is is ( which you can not ). Therefore, I rather see kraken being changed if you want to use it as example that 'tanking should always be rewarded'. Fireproof can not be shown in game as you're only fireproof if it doesn't kill you. Changing it so it reflects you took X percentage of fire damage would make it entirely worthless since it's not the trick to be burning a lot the trick is to survive burning a lot. Being on fire doesn't win games, being on fire and not dying to it wins games and should be rewarded. Yup that is why I would like WG to add a working lobby ( and fix their chat system ) so in game community can be more interactive. And maybe consider having some benefits for veterans spending time helping new players, or something to encourage this a bit.

We've had SGWA in the past which was this but without the clan structure ( and ties ). Open to everyone, signing up for sessions on a per case interest basis. I been thinking of bringing it back, with enough people showing interest I am sure something will happen eventually. There is also the HelpMe discord group, which has a lot of resource references and offers places to ask questions.

Well that's actually a good point. In which case I would change it so kraken is only given if you done at least half of the inflicted damage on all targets or something, if that would make you happier? Rather that then rewarding a BB rushing cap right away the same as a BB trading his hp in a calculated way to help secure a victory. edit: -> That's the big Q for me, rewards should mean something. Potential damage alone does not mean anything ( like a Kraken, good example ).

And potential damage is already reflected in experience, it's just that it can't be rewarded MORE when done in a situation where this potential damage actually matters more to securing a victory. And I been quite clear that you're wrong into thinking that you can reward potential damage in the game itself as a promotion of positive play. The same 'reward' would be given to the BB rushing cap at the start without even a DD in front trying to cap making it worth while, as to the BB which is trading his HP so the DD in front can complete his capture. Nah you just seem to deliberately don't get why actions in game aren't direct qualifications of good play and should therefore not be rewarded. My use of chivalry is just showcasing what is not a part of this game and should not be part of random battles. Tell me why BB's should be rewarded equally when their actions have very varying strategic effect? The rewarding of specific actions during operations however is totally separate from that, those are directly rewardable due to pre programmed conditions. No you clarified you have an opinion, you have not specified how this opinion would apply in game without failing some scrutiny.

No they are not. People 'willing to division' are not the same as 'willing to learn'. Divisioning with 'randoms' just for the sake of it, makes no sense at all. I am talking about a dedicated lobby for people where they can ask for help with specific things or even in general. In game chat rooms aren't even stable, saying they offer a feature like I'm asking for makes no sense. And the in game channel for people looking to division / for a clan looks like this -> Do you really think these channels offer anything I described? The SCRUBS community channel ( which is basically the in game forumites hangout ) hasn't had a working list of online people in idk how many patches. Text keep vanishing into thin air, people talking who aren't on the online list, people on the list which actually aren't online. And for what I would want you can't rely on player block 'feature', you need actual in game moderators to sort out the trolls from the actual people coming to ask for help with things, or to sort out those trolling people who come to ask for help. ^ just a little fyi. There is a thread about it somewhere as well... asking for 'details' so they can fix it but if it really had priority it would have been fixed already. I know, doesn't mean people shouldn't point out it's wrong WG can give me a new player who is really willing to learn and I don't object to playing with him ( though to prevent being called a sealclubber constantly I guess having access to a community account wouldn't hurt for those sessions )