mtm78

This might be a 'weird' request, but what if I don't have any actually specific ship but rather would like to be able to look up every ship in the game? I don't want to request you to just go down each tech tree as I don't want to burden you with to much work... edit: Also, this topic is more likely to get pinned in the 'Newcomers' section then in 'Gameplay'. The former is where all the informative 'tutorials' reside, and this would fit in nicely imo.

You shouldn't assume things, it is quite easy to check. Compare Kutuzov with Chapayev, Mogami with Atago, Indianapolis with Pensacola. Are they all weaker? Also, WG has stated about WoWs that premium are not meant to be weaker, just 'offer a different style of play'.

WoT allows showing other people's profile's in game, sure we can use our second monitors and look people up outside of the game but why should WG not add the functionality to the game itself just like WoT. And as I said on other occasions: using 'possible toxicity increase' as reason doesn't cut it, they should punish the people who would use this feature to be toxic towards people before withholding the information from everyone 'just in case'.

Uhm that's not a buff ( well artificial one ) as those will have very low dps. Maybe it will be like Imperator ( if your info is correct,,,, ), with it's 4 potato shooters which might or might not kill a scout plane if it flies straight over your ship 5 times in a row

Meh it's actually quite logical that Murmansk doesn't need to rely on the armor as much since it has a quicker rudder shift ( aka non potato players will dodge more incoming fire ).

Nope, last official news I read about this is that it's the 'drawback' of the ship which is counteracted by the fact that it has tier X upgrade slots. Maybe you want to provide a source for your news?

I think official news ( or the RU Q&A thread ) had some info about an 'armor viewer', but I am not sure

German BB's have a turtleback armor layout, the belt is less thick but there is a sloped inner deck which prevent citadels ( it's not as strong on Bayern though, you can citadel it with a Warspite no issues ( even frontally you sometimes get lolpen's from bigger guns on Bayern ). The armor on Bayern is comparatively weaker then the other German BB's.

Warspite doesn't really need much buffs it's already quite capable. The biggest drawback however compared to the Bayern is the range, it doesn't seem much but it can make the difference when being up tiered, so a range increase might be warranted ( and can be argued for now since Bayern is in the game ). edit: Iirc yes Bayern has lower AP damage per shell then Warspite.

Such a topic would be sticky material for sure! edit: well actually I would favor WG presenting the penetration values for ships in port, but on forum is a good second option

maybe Langley planes, and even that is unlikely edit: I do have to add that since the DP guns are large they will benefit from manual AAA, and with manual AAA and AFT + BFT ( aka totally specced for AAA ) with the AAA upgrades it might be a lot better than without

Just one correction, the AAA on Bayern is MUCH better then on Warspite, the 6x2 105's are awesome on Bayern!

Seconded ( well actually you aren't the first to suggest this but ok ).

Maybe this helps. edit: I was tempted to start at 2:01 but meh

Link was broken -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HMS_Aurora_(12)

Sorry it was more meant as a feather in the cap of ShipComrade then a jab at that other site ;) ShipComrade plays by the rules, even if they know they could get a instant ( temporary.. ) boost in page views if they would resort to 'other methods' of bringing news to the community. They, imho, are just doing it right and that should give them some credit in my book.

That one actually is a credit multiplier nerf for Amagi, it was only 6% though.

Normally I am against excluding ships from certain modes but I'd say Flint is to broken to be allowed imo...

And that is why ShipComrade is actually respected, and 'ThAt other shiP site' not

Yes Scharn is a terrible ship, just ask Flamu he will tell you Guess this falls under PEBCAK....

Not sure which PN they were but I can also recall alterations to the modifiers for Amagi ( along with a lot of other ships at the time ).

It's not the same ( but it just looks that way ). Seriously you did say the effect I just also mentioned cause

Omg, that's a 'better' example but 'really good gameplay'? It's a good game, period. And you might want to mention it like: I earned 81k credits AFTER paying my repair and service and ammo bills, I made a nice profit on an good game on a tier 8 battleship. I don't see this issue you're still rambling about. Play lower tiers if you run into problems keeping up with your support costs of your higher tiered ships. Really, first you would have made even on a loss if you hadn't used premium consumables, and in your second example you make 81k credits profit at tier 8 in a good game

Give it a few more battles, I bet you'll come around. High rof makes it more viable to kill of the low hp targets you would leave for your team when playing a higher caliber battleship, in the long run this will add up to a much higher percentage of kills imo.

It was my one and only battle today ( so far, I just started the game up again ), it's not like I was cherry picking results or anything ;)