mtm78

Uhm I won ( got gifted by WG ) a Marblehead and a Katori, so what are buying for Tuccy again? I don't think he needs ships, WG accounts and all

Just a quick rebuttal: if you have 54k average in those 91 games you don't 'MOST of the time' get 100k+ battles, it's mathematically impossible. You also have a 33% survival rate, which to many would imply that from your 54% victories with the ship you been carried a few times at least. Glad you like it, and I don't think she is bad either, but objectively she aint as good as you're claiming. 52% wr vs... 61%, yeah I can see how much more you've accomplished in live And wow, you got tier 10's you must be GOD.. ow wait SBF ( or was it Archon_x ) has a Zao so that would mean he's 'speciul' to... and he is, just like you it seems. Reaching tier X is meaningless, your average tier is I think just as high as his and he is clearly the better player.

Uhm I played the ship in both states, if you're thinking the ship was only playable before it's your mistake, not mine. Why does every good player I know find it in incredibly fun ship, and the guns more then adequate for the armor and utility you get with a Scharnhorst? I can tell you this much; it's not because the ship is unplayable.

Actually WG stopped providing base xp through wg api some time ago iirc..

Are you close to a 19th skill? I know I am not, but if you are maybe we should go ask WG for something special as well

But is a nice writeup with shiny pictures.....

Well replays break far to quickly with new patches to be off much use so a video without commentary wouldn't be an issue imo.

Meh I am using a New Orleans captain which obviously has AFT and I am still just out of the top 100 in dmg so I guess it's not THAT bad edit: Ictogan, would be nice if you could add some replays to your first post, or better yet video's of some of your replays

I think the weight on damage is to high, it should switch places with win rate imho because damage which isn't winning games isn't effective. Yes that would also mean I would get an instant boost in e-peen but really that has nothing to do with it edit: it used to take into account capping/decapping but WG api is giving wrong data to 3rd party sites so they had to stop using it.

Normally I don't promote iChase much but his last video on overpen's was pretty good and his point is very valid. It's one of the reasons I don't like playing BB's atm, you aren't getting to punish broadsiding cruisers anymore. Let's wait on live tests for the RN CL's and then comment on the impact, it will be much easier to point out the issues then right along with more evidence then 'just' basic assumptions no matter how valid they might appear. I am for changes which will cause gameplay focus more on proper teamwork, as long as it doesn't cross the limit where the amount of teamwork required is just not feasible in random teams. A CL with smoke, along with a radar equipped cruiser working together get a lot more utility ( see Flint + Atlanta divisions being so much 'fun' ). I guess general population will not be able to adapt quickly and there will be many complaints for sure, but if it makes gameplay more dynamic ( and those combination's don't create 'no fly/go bubbles' around them ) because teams run in traps/funnels or don't work together ( torping into smoke seems to work pretty well ). Anyway, let's wait and see.

The voice quality of the in built voice chat is lots better then what I knew from World Of Tanks when I played tank companies. That was absolutely horrible But this has decent bitrate it seems, as I said it's way way better. I still hang out on ts more so no point in really using it personally atm,

This is overall true but still there is another issue, currently the best armor CA's have is Potato Armor, this is armor you get from being a potato and showing perfect broadsides. It's almost rewarding bad play, the overpen's are real. Last game a York was sitting broadside on 12km and I got 3 overpen's on the citadel area... he had to actually angle for me to be able to kill him with a citadel hit, it's the world upside down isn't it in a way? Unless it's intended 'to counter the toughness off BB's we'll give CA's not more armor, but make the amount of armor be so few BB's can't land those citadels on bad players'. I hope it's not and something will be done about this, the biggest strength a cruiser captain had before was knowing how to angle and kite or push at the same time and now it's actually 'better' to sit broadside on to BB's and just spam HE ( instead of angle and kite and spam HE ).

I also enjoy playing the Sims, especially in domination games. +1 for sticky.

Well I actually do think Shima wasn't OP or broken, there were just to many off them ( because it was easy to get some damage in with almost no risk to yourself... guess that is why I grinded it. Only to have it nerved when I just gotten it ). And live testing will show the amount of team work required to counter smoke on CL's.. I don't see how it would be more broken then Flint is atm, and according to lots of people those who complain about Flint just need to 'l2p' Anyway, we will see. I still have some hope for WoWs community to not keep asking the game to be dumbed down more and more

I got nothing to be jealous off, I am grateful you bump this thread showing us how stupid people are who spread unsubstantiated rumors and gossip without mentioning it's just that; rumors and gossip. Carry on

LOL... The other guys ship is just more accurate than mine, I tell ya guys WG just didn't like and nerved ONLY my Scharnhorst

I like more tactical games, and I'm not a big BB gameplay fan. It can be quite fun in DD's atm, but cruisers have it incredibly hard. And cruisers for me are the most dynamic class, they can do most tasks to some degree and thus as very flexible, where as a BB is meant to be a dmg dealer and sponge. Sure, some BB's allowing being ultra aggressive but they are rarely played like that since one requires support to do it. Also, I haven't played USN DD's on live server so I am not a great user of offensive smoke screens. But yeah, they are a part of the game, I got no issues with them as long as people aren't idiots you can counter them easilly throughout some teamwork. Yeah, figure that, over 8k posts and still going on about teamwork in WoWs

Posting in this thread while you SHOULD KNOW by now this was another off TAP's unsubstantiated rumors, well done. Maybe people should think for themselves instead of going off on rumors and gossip.

https://eu.warships.today/help/warships_today_rating

Seems it's performing better than Warspite ( which should be a relief... unless someone is British ), and that in a very BB heavy current meta. I think the performance figures will only climb when German BB grind comes down to normal levels.

Shhhh, seven is dead right in the center of six and eight you know I somehow expected you to find the gameplay more 'dynamic' when it's filled with BB's yes...

Welcome to World Of Flints

Ow man originality 0/10 ( I pointed out how much I admired it days ago )

Competition from what? Does that look als tactical als wows or does it look more like some really arcade like fantasy game which might have some classes which vaguely resemble the classes we have here? To me it looks like the latter