mtm78

At tier 3 this always were the case

That amount of teamwork, and that on tier 3. Yup that's a good sign

What, the picture in the spoiler didn't gave it away????

Remember certain ammo changes which were pre announced and players spending millions buying that ammo because they wanted to make profit selling it after the patch at the much increased selling price?

I was having a go at making a joke since OP's concerns have been dissected already. Guess it didn't work as intended Anyway, I went from 1080 back to 1050 and even that totally messed with my aim, even though it's long enough that I should be 'used' to this res I still feel like I have more situations where I have to use a smaller zoom step to get accurate lead's and that this then means I am not as zoomed in as I wanted because I have issues guestimating small course changes. Just saying, I fully understand the importance of aspect ratio's in this game. And I never said you complained, I know fully well you do ok since we met a couple of times in game

Your screen doesn't matter, it's just about 'feeling' the correct angles to hit the target.

Stereoscopic 3d support, wow yeah you got me there I never played the game with that setup ( I wish I could, though I would then probably want a faster card then the 660 ). Anyway, the screenshot also indicates that your post contains a reasoning flaw: it renders some things at the wrong depths UNLESS you turn off shadows. So, turn of shadows and point 2 is mute. As to microlag, I am not sure that's limited to nvidia only. Yes I don't suffer from it now and I'm on AMD but I know plenty on NVIDIA who also are playing normally. You might need to check your own settings and maybe lower some. The recommended system specs mentioned by WG are not applicable to how you're rendering the game, I would play at low details a game and if that removes the lagging try increasing them incrementally so you can find the setting which is causing your issues ( or settings/combination ).

Can you provide a source for you claim in point 2? I have played WoWs a long time ago with several Nvidia cards and other then some drivers putting OTM's all over my screen the experience wasn't bad. I certainly am not aware that Nvidia themselves claims their video card renders things at the wrong places..

I gotten offers for discounts on port slots and cammo's I think ( last one not sure ) but I've never gotten a 'juicy' personal offer for discount on a premium or something else really worthwhile. And I bought plenty ( 2 much ). edit: Not that I should complain btw, I won a Marblehead and a Katori for instance

wows-numbers works fine, thanks for reminding me I thought for a moment it could be related to some of my previous live testing with ships not in the database yet, but external api should have no reference to them either so that's ruled out. Also wouldn't coincide with others having the same issues with w-today. Weird edit: anyway, as wows-numbers works fine, it's not the external API I have to change OP and perhaps even close the thread because it's not something which can be resolved here.

Stop selling sheeps you scrub, you need wool for the coming winter!

Yup, like saying WG should balance around average player, which sounds nice but is ultimately a bad idea. edit: I seen screenshots with 200k dmg and some utility ( sinking DD's, probably some spotting as well? ) and they made a loss in a victory. WG already said it's not working as intended for CV's. sadly I am not counting on a 'quick fix' at all.

Just press battle, if 10m into the game you see your top tier BB with full HP 'sidescraping' behind islands and blaming the team ( calling them violet stet pedders to boot ), that's Steve. If you have multiple top tier BB's doing this, their name is always Steve.

^^ this.

Nope, they won't ever learn. Ever heard of Steve the IS7 driver? He joined WoWs, en masse ;)

Naahh, they should listen to OPINIONS more then facts right

Maybe server is just overloaded? Ranked started, maybe WG skimped on enlarging cluster to anticipate more matches being played ( matches consume resources, players per match matter less afaik ).

Noooo ofc not, only Shimakaze's were clearly OP because of how many there were per game right. And that's not because they were actually OP but because they were 'to easy to play'. 'To easy to play'.... mhm which class would this apply to as well currently.. I got no clue, really.

No it doesn't -> You have to wait until the spinning activity indicator stops, that's when it will display the error message. Also, compare total games there and on my WG profile page.

Yeah like I said, that one CV could ruin it entirely if he's parking planes over a DD ( but hey CV's with captains who spot DD's seem to be rare, they rather use their planes to do damage then assist their team, might as well benefit from that once ).

Either that or Gremmy with CE doing pew pew from 9.9km without being seen, occasionally coming closer to launch some fishes. Kamikaze would probably do better damage wise though.

Pffff I want to take my tier 5 DD in that match and I'll have a good chance of having a blast ( unless the CV parks planes on top of me, in which case the game would suck again )

... please Go watch the effects of focus fire in competitive games, now extrapolate that even potato's will focus an enemy cruiser if the other targets are all BB's.

Right up till the time you used smoke twice and the BB's are still singling you out because you're the easiest target to just obliterate. Ow wait, you were being sarcastic right? Right? Right??!!?!?!?!

Loopholes, loopholes everywhere