mtm78

Well no, but if the game was populated less by potato's it might be nice ;)

Yeah its so cheap that fire damage is so incredibly high .... ow wait, shiet, WG actually posted damage distribution charts and fires are by far not as 'cheap' as you make it out.

Anecdotal, play 100 games and then tell me current meta is acceptable for CA's. Another way to put it: one swallow doesn't make a summer. I had some pretty good Izumo games lately, performing well above my normal levels in the ship. Yes it makes me feel good, but it doesn't mean I suddenly think Izumo is a good BB ( and statistical performance is indicating it isn't ).

ctrl-x locks gun on bearing ( aka they will turn with the ship ) shift-x locks on sector aka you can turn the ship but the gun's will attempt to stay fixed on a direction independent of the ship.

The developers have plenty of channels ( I know for instance that EU ST has plenty of good/excellent/supernintendounicum CV players capable of giving feedback and offering suggestions ), it's not like they have to have personal experience playing the class, they should trust on their feedback channels.

WoT and WoWs both use BigWorld engine, just different versions. But yes, that is why I would assume merging the codebase from WoT's new renderer with WoWs shouldn't be that much work ( relatively speaking, it's still work but they don't need to write it from scratch ).

I've gone into battles with premiums without cammo, just because I was using some other cammo to help retrain a captain or something, and then forgot to put the old cammo back on when I was done. Usually the impact of not having a cammo on a CA or BB isn't that large anyway. A DD without cammo though is an idiot, since concealment is such a key factor ( VMF DD's not so much.. ). And yes, that means I been an idiot taking a Sims/Blys/Gremmy out without cammo

I hated CV's, because I was a noob and I didn't know how to deal with them. I also hated them because I don't find them fun to play ( and I have played quite a lot off rts's in my life so I expected more off it ). Then I started talking about them, and got tips and advice on how to deal with them even when they were grossly overpowered. And I changed my mind, simply because it dawned on me that CV's ( just like ninja DD's ) are actually an intricate part in enforcing a certain level off teamplay. So I changed my mind, and from bashing CV's on forum I gone to defending their abilities ( maybe even a bit to much just to offset all the hating the class got ). Would be funny I guess if I looked up my first few posts about the 'utterly broken concept' of carriers and compare them with my latter posts, people might think my brain has been taken over by some Martian virus

Why would it be very expensive? And there are performance benefits from moving from DX9 to a newer iteration, I would assume such an upgrade is most definitely planned at some time in the not that far future.

-7% means that is a ship has a 10% chance off fire with an HE shell, it drops to a 9.3% chance of fires. The skill is mostly useless.

Jezus get a room you scrubs

If you want to talk down on casuals, hiding your profile just makes you suspicious

Credits and XP are not tied, I find it correct they focus on 'fixing' XP foremost as this is a grind game and more people would get shafted by incorrect XP gains then incorrect credit income ( that having said, if the economy is limiting people to play it's ofc even worse -> see PvE 'hotfix' ).

Nah assuming people are right handed is just as bad as not mentioning someone is left handed, Even if 88-92% of the people on the globe are right handed

Thanks Leo, w-ships.today is having some issues with my account, it says I hide them unless I played a game that day ( site is bugged ). Using http://wows-numbers.com/player/501112274,mtm78/ for now.

What do expect from topics like these? If they moved the ship down a tier, or buffed it, what do you think will happen when players like me would play them? edit: if you're looking for 'positive feedback' then you're in the wrong thread. If the thread tittle was: "help me learn to play the Warspite" I wouldn't respond with PEBKAC / wetware issues aka l2p, I would go into how I play the ship and that it seems to work for me.

Classiness vs Savageness: tune in tonight for this glorious battle of the tinfoil hats

Where is the "NO just learn to play' answer in the poll? I'm reaching 70% wr on Warspite which is close to my 'grossly overpowered' Imperator Nicolai I. My Fuso damage is a little bit higher ( and wr at 67% ), I don't see how Warspite should be a tier 5 unless it was nerfed a lot. If people can't make her work, it's a PEBCAK issue, wetware and not the darn ship. L 2 P

I voted yes, but not because I think OP is being handicapped by the pinkies ( there should be ultimately just as many games where there are two pinkies in the enemy team ) but because it would add a 'penalty' to being pink.

That so much salt I fear he will need to a off tears to wash them away. Also, what kind of tinfail hats you got OP? I only want the classy one's like these ->

Wow.... I feel so stupid right now

sweaten the cake pleb, humiliating you isn't rewarding enough on it's own.

QQ those darn overpowered cruisers are burning my precious battlesheep?? Learn to manage fires, You got damage control and repair parties. Learn to use them.

I can't take pride in beating baddies like you, nor am I getting any good vibe from even talking to someone who lies to try and hide his incompetence. Ps I played thousands of games which you will never see in publicaties stats, many this month before I resigned as st

lolwut stop lying -> http://wows-numbers.com/player/501112274,mtm78/ Ahhhhhh yeah, that is why we already said 'over a larger number of games' as all those things even out over time. Or did you just claim that people with better stats then you all must be cheating