mtm78
-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Everything posted by mtm78
-
The game can't be balanced around team/clan/tournament play, so while it would be less of an issue with a totally coordinated team ( might even be 'fun' if you can bait people with it ) it's going to be really bad for random gameplay. And so far, mechanics have always been based on their impact on random games above all others.
-
Video's and Streams man, video's and streams I even think you'll get more traffic there then here ( this forum structure is still not making that much sense though to me so take it with some salt ;) ).
-
This. True, but it's not about how many will take it, it's a skill which is utterly broken in concept alone already.
-
Point is the crying whining BBabies don't need radar, it's incredibly stupid to even ask what the 'issue' is. "Ow but it's just ONE Battleship which get's a cruiser exclusive consumable, don't worry. We shouldn't complain, as WG is known for not being so in tune with their community they will eventually give World of Battleships BBabies the AAA defensive fire because 'hey what's the point of not giving it' ... ^^
-
CRUISERS != BATTLESHIPS. BBabies don't need more handholding.
-
Not to mention it's also factually false, besides being written like a pileup of traffic accident descriptions.
-
If true, wouldn't that be really really sad?
-
Could this perhaps lead to a game ban ( temp depending on how in game status )? Not sure, I know it's probably a forum ban but he did just upload his own evidence of team killing and that he did it on purpose xD
-
Doesn't matter if a mechanic is rare, it's still broken. BB's with radar is just a broken mechanic, it can not be justified with 'rarity' like how WG justifies keeping overperforming premiums around.
-
Promoting team killing is afaik not allowed on the forums
-
Wasn't the original working title for this game: "World Of Battleships" Seems they only changed the name while the new name suggest changes in gameplay as well.
-
FTFY It really does work better with sound, trust me
- 129 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- 5.15
- captain skill
- (and 1 more)
-
Use it as a shortcut in future discussions if I am not sure if I should take someone serious or not perhaps? Not sure, but anyone who thinks this is a good skill imo is not worth listening to. But hey, I know my opinions can be quite strong, and it's ok to disagree right Just as WG seems to say BBabies don't need more babysitting, they do exactly that. That's just sad imo. Let's hope it never get's on live server, or if it does I might regret less having played so little lately.
-
This still totally removes flanking from the game as an option, which will make fights more stagnant ( corridor fighting even without islands? ).
-
Another one of those...
-
Out of likes, guess I have to spam another gif
-
Flamu's Twitch stream iirc was called 'Making WoWs great again'. Seriously, I think Flamu would be a better POTUS then Trump but hey I'm not Murican so I couldn't vote sadly
-
https://explorers.org/pdf/TEC_2010_Flag._REVISED_Report._Kevin_V._Denlay_Operation_Dukedome_Flag_52_Nov._2010.pdf Correct
-
The wrecks were discovered not that long ago iirc ( couple of years ). Before that exact location was unknown, so this 'looting' if it was this has to be between then and now I assume. The more I think about it, the more I hope it's a natural disaster which changed the seabed.
-
Thing is, there was no 'worthwhile' cargo, the wrecks were situated at 30m+ and a full recovery of 3 ships is stupendously expensive. These were/are not 'treasure' ships, so when I read this this morning I was shocked. And I was left wondering, it makes no sense at all. Local divers -> they might steal things to sell on the black market. But they can't make the hulls dissapear. Commercial entity -> might recover the ships entirely but must have motivation. Other options: 1. first identification of the wrecks was wrong ( or in wrong location ). 2. ships 'moved' due to natural causes ( earthquake or w/e ). I seriously don't know what to think, just that it must be hard for those with ties with anyone who died during that battle
-
Let's see if WG listens to it's players edit: also, I just <3 public polls... anyone who wants this skill in the game should be identified clearly
- 129 replies
-
- 1
-
-
- 5.15
- captain skill
- (and 1 more)
-
Well if he specifically said: "low tier RN CL's are not competitive" then I would have just +1'd the post ofc But from tier 6 and up they are consistently amongst the top performers. Hard to play, or 'different', perhaps, but they seem to get the job done statistically.
-
Yeah... until you reach tier VI and have more than half a working brain cell? Did you actually check their performance before ranting?
-
Wut? You mean DD's which are preparing for a torpedo run? I mean, Kiev kind of is a DD and it won't stealth torp anything ever except from behind cover ;) As I said above, you just found out that it sometimes sucks to have to play with random people. CV's are iconic for the game.... wait... Yeah.... 6.4 average tier, but you HAD to mention this? Looks like you ran out of arguments beforehand and have to switch to those statements trying to save face. Sorry, it failed.
-
You don't play a Kagero stock... ( as in, no module and not even cammo ), and most people are expecting tier IX captains to not suck and have CE already. Playing 'stock' Kagero is bad, imagine meeting a full stealth built Fletcher ;)
