mtm78

I just finished this game and it kind of shows my frustration: I could do this in Hatsu because gun's were not that terrible. But as you see my gun performance wasn't spectacular either now. And the reason we lost mainly imo was that I couldn't change positions quickly enough to do damage without running into their radar cruisers, the slow speed made that impossible That Atlanta gave me hell whole game, a Belfast was hunting me as well, I could NOT use smoke at any time during the match. And this is without AFT captain so stealth fire window isn't that large. Now I know, the ship it replaces was 'bad'.. but Hatsu has been my record max damage game holder for a long time because the torps if you had such a game where RNGezus lead your shells straight to the enemy, you would rack up a monster score. The torps are not only slower, they hurt less to.

Yeah I am not doing terrible myself but it's different meta. Instead being focused on BB's I feel more confident taking on low HP cruisers, and I'm kind of forced into the 'multi role' play because focusing on BB's is less optimal. My point isn't that the new ships are bad, or unplayable. But they are not "anti capital ships" anymore. Which makes sense in a way if you think that WG is going to add more content which will take on that role.. but they aren't. German DD's will have hydro... you don't give DD's hydro and expect them to go after the BB's mainly, you give them hydro to gunfight other DD's. And imo, though I'm not playing above tier 8 enough to have a good feel on it, mid tier IJN DD's were not overperforming ( aside of Minekaze but that's a given ). What I would like them to have? Not sure, as I said I am not doing bad in them, but I don't like the changes anyway. Less concealment.. yeah well but it's still good in comparison. Torps.. well the 63kts ( or was it 62kts... ) I'm using now aren't bad at all for 10km. But yes, IJN torps need something... like less detection, like USN high tier torps? edit: and MOAR SPEED!!!!! <<<--- I was in a battle and a Shchors was chasing me..... and I couldn't break contact ffs because I had to keep wiggling and he was faster than me :/

DDs have 3 sections, bow mid and stern. Superstrucure is part of midsection.

So that's what I'm doing wrong in Fiji

Most of the content is the same ( same actual modders ), the difference is in which one is official. Either way I'm Martian not Russian but thanks I guess, like Seagal I to strive to one day become a proper Sovjetski Comrade!

Ow right almost forgot, reported for clickbait, should be in video's and streams where no one would see it

Can I tell people about this wonderfull OFFICIAL modpack WG created. You can find it here -> Ow crap, wrong link. Well follow the post anyway as it leads to the proper thread anyway.

Ow look another newbie who thinks legitimate complains from veterans is below his level... Ow and look, an account without any battles played... Shut up and go away.

Pfff I'm still more fond of the memories of Umikaze in tier 8 and recking enemy team earning top xp in team

utrinqueparatus, on 06 December 2016 - 08:01 AM, said: So your implying I don't know game mechanics ?? Thanks for answering your own question

I did quote you complaining that CV's where the only class with limited ammunition..... Just as I did quote you on saying that all you need to do to evade CV attacks in a BB is to make circles.... Sorry man, I'm not making that crap up, you did.

Did someone hurt your feelings? I didn't say anything about ffin economy my 'friend'. How's that for sarcasm? Maybe if you ffin knew what the heck you were talking about you would realize I am not saying CV don't need no rework I said OP's suggestions are not cutting it. Just as his complaints show he's not to be taken serious. Like, complaining about no infinite amount of airplanes... But yeah CV economy is broken, and ofc you also want infinite planes right... ow wait you probably know that's stupid but you just wanted to attack me because you're salty I sank you in game? Something like that I bet, has to be because otherwise you wouldn't try to ad hominem me with Imperator which I haven't played in ages. So ffin what I don't respond to the ONE single point OP has, it's already known for everyone CV economy isn't good. Just as EVERYONE AND THEIR DOG knows the UI needs a rework. Need me to comment on that as well? No? Good. Ow, sorry, couldn't help it, there was sarcasm in this post. Sarcasm but no ad hominem. You know sarcasm is allowed right? Ad hominem however... especially if that's your only point, and even there you fail.

Car's don't come with Dasha voice packs either!

There are no premiums with preferential matchmaking anymore. None will be added in the future ( same policy you can see in WoT ).

Any elimination contest resolves on being the last one eliminated, I guess those are all real winners in those so who not here?

Bite through it, Leander is a breath of fresh air and Fiji is where the dpm takes a giant leap. The tier 4 and 5 are the worst in the line.

His account is from 2015, would that constitute a slow learner? Yes, more automation, more 'pressing buttons = skillful play' Ow wait.. that was sarcasm Yes, which makes them require some skill to use! Thank god for this, imagine if they could just sacrifice planes and drop on everything without having to manage limited plane count.... So learn the AAA ranges of ships and keep track of them. Good cv players know the AAA range of all ships along with roughly the DPS or threat levels. Wait.. why am I even answering this... everyone, listen up: we never have to be hit by CV again, all we have to do is.... ( wait for it..... wait for it..... drumroll please... ): go in a circle. edit: And don't edit your post after you been replied to it it's called flamebait if you make a rant topic and then change the entire tone of the post.

Yeah that's actually true, guess what I meant is that they won't sue you if you sell your single code you got with your motherboard for instance ( well they might but they won't spend resources on investigating unless someone reports it directly ). What WG does NOT want in any way, are commercial resellers and/or leveling services. And 1s search ebay wargaming codes -> lots of 'bad things' showing up.

Wait, move around scanning? Scanning is automated, anything in range is shown, how is that 'fun'? At Least with situational awareness and los checking, something which is actually fun, there is an element of skill involved. And can you imagine that crap on ocean? In short; how about no?

Bigger teams could lead to more composition variations being viable especially with big maps and dynamic missions. Not sure WG would ever go that way though.

Hey I know, people who reach rank one multiple times are not doing it by accident. I also seen some of the 'bad' players actually improve after actually learning from failing in ranked, and that indeed shows it's for everyone. Just not for me I guess, I can't stand it when I lose a game and it's 100% clearly visible who is to blame ( which happens a lot more with small teams ) since there is no way the frustration can be put into something constructive. As you say you play with strangers, so you can't afterwards try and figure out a better way, making sure a next game isn't lost because of the same reasons. In the end the frustration would overcome the entertainment value, even if WG offers quite valuable rewards.

I'm pretty sure he's about right though, not 90% but 70-80% is almost an certainty. Sorry for OT, but I'm sure everyone here already knows OP suggestion isn't going to cut it so I don't feel that guilty going a bit off topic here edit: to clarify, not me, 3 people I can pick at random ( they won't be random bobs though ) in ships I pick....

^^^ So much this. With including more tiers you make playing it viable for more people and you lessen the feeling off 'grind' since you can use more ships overall. But still, ranked remains pointless, I don't understand those claiming it's 'skill based' when I see people with 46% wr reaching rank 1. Imo ranked should be more about winning games, and not about how much games one can spam in the season to rank up. Like, make it a 100 battles event, and reward those who win the most of those 100 battles, using other performance indicators if needed to differentiate. Number is arbitrary btw, just calling something. It would be much more indicative of skill then current implementation, where baddies can just spam until they get lucky and get several carries in a row from others. This would be far less of an issue in a set number of matches, and therefore a way better indicator of actual skill. And shouldn't a competitive mode resolve around skill?

You do know a lot of the people giving you advice have shown to posses a greater insight into the game then you have done in your WoWs career? I would take the advice and use it. Perhaps it doesn't apply to you, but if you see it being said about others it might still help you in knowing what to expect.

Meh ok so less bulge protection then NM. Still feels pretty gud to me but hell I'm not a BB main