mtm78

Yup, because it makes absolutely no sense to allow a skill reset for ships which are inherently different from the ships they captained before as obviously those new ships benefit from the same skills because they are so different then their previous counterpart. Ow wait... The reasoning is both 'acceptable' and 'bs' at the same time, but I'm leaning more towards the latter

If you're with a couple of quick DD's and CA/CL's you can usually take those caps first. Depending on how much force enemy sends, you can either defend or defend while GTFO'ing. It's not a bad tactic imo, even if only for the point lead you might get from it and the pressure this puts on the enemy team. The downside is, people usually don't understand that if the enemy pushes with force, you can not defend that cap for long so they stick around to long and die thus negating the point advantage you had from the early cap. That is why going for them needs to be done by people with a brain... sadly though:

Trolling and sarcasm is close enough, as I usually troll with being sarcastic ps, you got a spelling error in your signature edit: and for having to add it, well text chat doesn't convey 'emotions' or 'intent' that well. Isn't that why they invented 'smillies'

That I would love to see! Must be a lot of BB's torped to death to rack up that dmg, and surviving that many yolo torpedo runs means he either got extremely lucky or had extremely bad enemies

I think the older demographic of WoWs is what makes this community as good as it is. Also, WoWs is a bit slower paced then WoT for instance.. though mainly I am guessing there are a lot of old sailors clicking on ships

We have one, it's If this would be twitch it would be Kappa

Guys... edit: this is also a public poll, if you check the colors on who voted for Dunq you should be able to tell what's most probably the in game outcome ;)

Sorry to disappoint you, though I have to add '78 is a really vintage year if you ask me I think I might know some older folks playing, but you're putting me on the spot with the '59 as no one I know beats you

Funny coming from the one who just made the comment about citadelling BB's with CA's from close range

It's not Nvidia related, I have the slow shutdowns to ( never really got 'hung' but I do have some registry tweaks which might play a role ) with an AMD7850.

Like being able to citadel BB's from close range is any ffin redeeming trait German CA's can do the same, Russian CA's can do the same ( from longer ranges - Moskva ). Zao's AP is devastating if you get a broadside BB at close range to. edit: just in case you were wondering, there is a reason people say: possible but NOT recommended.

That's an excellent idea! Which ofc would mean WG will never implement it, or only after implementing a full BB line with radar ofc

I don't want to see those stats for performance comparison, I want to see which ships you play mostly or exclusively That is because it puts things into perspective. You complain about the DD heavy meta, and I hear that's tier 8-9-10 atm, so if you're playing 8+ no one would argue with you about it. But if you play lower tiers and still complain about 'torpedo soup', sorry but that would open up a can of worms so to say. I've said this before, a hidden profile in balance / meta discussions is not a good thing because it hides any bias, prejudice or even lack of actual knowledge. I seen people comment on ships which are in tier spreads which they shouldn't have ever met since their accounts had tier 5 max ships ( for example ). Just as I seen BBabies complain about everything which could damage them, while they had abysmal performance in their BB's and wanted to blame that on the class. While I'm doing BEST in my BB's ( boosted a bit with Imperator I guess so take it with a grain of salt ). DDBaby, sorry man it was just.. .it doesn't have a ring to it if you know what I mean. DDady ( since 'DD main's' think DD's are the daddy of WoWs)? Also not that great as BBaby but idk, beats DDBaby imo We should do a forum contest, who can think of fitting acronyms for DD/CA/CV 'babies' edit: anyway just to make it clear, you don't have to 'proof' or show anything, nor do you have to take my arguments to hearth as to why I personally think you should show your stats if you want to talk about balance or meta. Also, it was in no way personal sorry if I came across harsh or belittling that was really not the intent.

^^

Saturated sections should continue to bleed damage from adjacent sections, 10% is fine with me as long as you can do some damage it's usually enough. ps first time I saw the video I commented how this isn't actually representative since bots all target center mass. Any one of those being a player and targeting the bow/stern would have killed that Yamato.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Alabama_(BB-60) I would say nope, no 'crappy cartoon' sheep.

Pretty sure he was being sarcastic and he was blaming failing with the new DD's on WG making them crappy. My signature agrees with that statement, but I have to admit I'm playing like 100% potato lately

Usually AFK people will die before end of match since enemy moves up to spawn. And if not, I report all AFK even those starting minutes late as BOT ( and I would urge EVERYONE to do the same ).

Wrong, so wrong. Should be.... Just saying, can not != should not.

Proof it, with a hidden profile your word means little to me Btw, I mostly play CA's it seems ( 48% ) then BB's 27% and then DD's 24%. You could have checked that yourself, since my profile isn't private DDbaby? Sorry man, 1 out off 10 for effort. Yeah I seen German BB's with hydro do magic torpedo beats while their 10km secondaries reck any DD which is spotted closebye. But hey, you're saying that DD beats BB still without issues right, guess we'll take your word for it... NOT. edit: you know what would actually be compelling evidence? Show us your profile so we can see how easy you wreck BB's in your DD's. Well ok, not compelling, but something at least

Especially since people who don't frequent forums or media will still be going on about the 'pocket BB' thingie expecting it to fare better against 'normal BB' then regular cruisers.

Your signature scares me Graff Spee I think will be quite fun to sail, but yeah can't preview her so I would have to go on reviews

So Gremmy and Kamikaze won? Nice, exactly my preferences

Especially when done by salty people who blame the one still alive for them being death. And yes, that no different when it's someone on the enemy team, if I got reports left I will report it. But you're right, the categories are quite ambiguous.

Private profile, can I wager a guess you're a BBaby BB main?