-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
south dakota-class Battleship alabama is coming
mtm78 replied to Reisen__'s topic in General Discussion
I don't know who actually defended having SoDak exclusive, I don't think anyone actually claimed or said anything like that. Afaik people were stating that Alabama as a ship shouldn't be an issue ( and frankly, for me it isn't as I said above ). But the class, no one in their right mind would ever think that giving ST access to SoDaK exclusively would be 'acceptable' with the community. -
south dakota-class Battleship alabama is coming
mtm78 replied to Reisen__'s topic in General Discussion
Are you thick headed or just .... well I can't say that here without getting edited anyway.... I said WG would not model SoDaK for just ST as you kept claiming. And they never planned on that, SoDak will be in the tech tree after the split ( which you kept ignoring ). And yes, I expected Massachusetts to be the premium, and yes I think WG changed their mind because of all the complaints and now will release the premium under the Alabama name. But that's just how they want to call it, doesn't change one bit about them ALWAYS having planned to release a regular SoDaK premium. -
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
Yeah I'm glad DSM V lost all those 'sub categories' for ASD as well, labels are not useful in mental health care imo. People had so many issues because they wouldn't 'fit' in a particular category, it's ridiculous. -
USS Alabama tier 8 US premium BB preliminary stats (5.16)
mtm78 replied to Darth_Glorious's topic in Battleships
I don't think they planned on selling Alabama no, you're right. But Massachusetts or one of the other SoDak's as premium and as tech tree ship were a 100% guarantee. I also would have been 100% cool with that, especially since I don't have any emotional bond with either of them I just feel it's more fair if a ship class ( emphasis on class ) is available for everyone. But I can understand other might have a bond with the ship so in the end WG made the right call. -
We lost, my BB's were at the 10 line while I was trying to secure center cap which is hard with a Blys without CE against their DD's with support, I killed their last DD'just before the match ended but couldn't secure the center and the A cap before they hit 1000 points. Also, I don't see how you think my job is 'killing the enemy DD's' when without CE and especially alone in center of the map against enemy DD's with supporting cruisers. Our Kagero did a good job, he tried contesting A and did quite well there ( without much support he delayed a lot of enemies there! ). I capped C at the start of the match, then I had to leave because I was greatly outnumbered since my team went for a large part behind the islands at C where they couldn't impact the game at all ( and then continued chasing some ship down the 10 line, when I was constantly telling them to come to center and help contest the cap's as we were losing on points hard. Either way, the actual only point is: we had two bottom tier AFK people. WG should take harsher measures against those people as they ruined my chances of winning, even while I played a decent game ( not good or exceptional, but pretty decent ). With two more ships in the team ( it was 10 vs 12, enemy Amagi was at least trying to have an impact even while he was a terrible player ) the chances of my team winning would have been much higher. Ur right about the Iowa though, which is why I feel it's even more frustrated that we had two bottom tiers saying: "screw you guys I'm going home" just because they were bottom tier. I actually think, since you correctly point out the MM wasn't even 'bad', the penalty for those two people who didn't want to play should be even harsher?
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
This tier is to hard for me to keep voting. Tier 7 has way to many fun and good ships I just can't downvote any of the one's I actually have experience with. People calling it a 'Pepsi with a bit more armor'- 452 replies
-
- Elimination
- Elimination thread
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
Yes that will work, just install Aslain's first as the installer cleans res_mods.
-
The range on the Bastion's gun's are limited, so yes your own BB's and CA's should suppress them from range or risk severe retaliatory damage. Once they are suppressed though they should push in and support the DD's trying to cap.
-
I don't think you should be playing tier 5-6, I think you should be playing any tier you want to play. If that's 5, then it's 5, but that means WG is shafting your MM in favor of newer players. So instead of moving up to 7, drop down to 4? Also, I don't think you're a bad player, I think you should be able to feel comfortable playing tier 7. And I am willing to try and help you with that if you want, just drop bye the Forumites chat channel in game and if I'm there we'll division up for some tier 7 games. Maybe I can give you some pointers, and even if not we probably will have some fun and win some matches together! I know some people from your clan, as in I seen them play at the higher tiers, and they are definitely not all bad ( despite the clan tag ). I do hope you're playing in division with them, as it's both more fun and a lot easier with some other capable people on voice com so you can support eachother.
-
One on One - Battleship vs Cruiser
mtm78 replied to Sterling_Archer_UK's topic in General Discussion
Yeah, he complained ships can hide in smoke and still shoot at ships spotted by their team. Or well that's what I got from it You got to get ur noobspeech up to par man -
They got BB guns mounted ( not sure if it was 15'' or 16'' ) what did you expect? 127mm DD guns
-
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
Well OP hasn't been exactly honest I think, as 7 day bans are NOT handed out for mere chat violations. So maybe his guilt is actually justified. -
WG, can you please ban people quicker for being whiney cry babies? It's getting a bit pathetic how they are allowed to ruin my gameplay enjoyment. PS -> bottom tier and still top of team... got any more to say cry babies? edit: To the guy pm'ing me and telling me I should stop posting here, since I was obviously 'to good a player to have any valid arguments ', how about no ;) My points in this discussion are at least as valid as yours, mine are even backed up by the ToS you agreed on when installing the game.
-
Why forgo CE on Leni? Makes little sense ( unless you're using Khaba captain of something ). And why would Leni be more rewarding?
-
Masakundra will not allow Aslain to use his mods ;)
-
One on One - Battleship vs Cruiser
mtm78 replied to Sterling_Archer_UK's topic in General Discussion
Wrong thread... and same old whine -
south dakota-class Battleship alabama is coming
mtm78 replied to Reisen__'s topic in General Discussion
This was obvious to the people with a clue from the start. There was no way WG would model a ship exclusively for ST. Thanks for clearing it up for those who needed it -
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
Well 99% of the people then just need to be able to READ the chat, and have no need to actually say anything edit: just before heads start to turn, there is almost always some sarcasm in my posts ;) It's closer to 90% then 99% -
south dakota-class Battleship alabama is coming
mtm78 replied to Reisen__'s topic in General Discussion
More assumptions without proof. -
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
This is true. And 'advice' can be given with a simple map ping. But you should be able to differentiate between 'all chat' , 'team chat' and 'division chat', not to mention port chat ( wouldn't want to miss out on the Forumites channel for instance ). -
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
No complex ptsd is a form of ptsd which is not caused by a single traumatic event ( but rather prolonged exposure to traumatic events ). It's a lot harder to deal with, I had emdr in the past it didn't help ( in fact it severely backfired due to lacking follow up ), I am on a waiting list again though but it's very important I'm stable enough before starting. -
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
PTSD is I know that, but complex PTSD afaik wasn't accepted yet as an official diagnose. And yeah my ex man... without her we would have world peace! -
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
I don't even think it's possible to get banned for insults. Never heard of it before. Even people who made the foulest of remarks only get chat bans afaik. Now if you threaten people in chat, that will get you more then a chat ban. But OP said he just used 'foul language'. -
USS Alabama tier 8 US premium BB preliminary stats (5.16)
mtm78 replied to Darth_Glorious's topic in Battleships
Sander93, on 16 December 2016 - 09:18 AM, said: Well, they did. Now they say they 'planned' to sell the ship at a later time. Ow look, another guy who thinks WG would really spend months modeling a ship class just to give one ship off that class to ST as reward Ofc they planned to release more SoDak ships eventually ( not sure when it was originally planned though, might have been in the more distant future compared to how quick we might see it happen now ). -
Apologizing for my bad behavior in game chat!
mtm78 replied to Capt_Wet_Pants's topic in General Discussion
Did c-PTSD make it into the DSM already? ( sorry for off topic )
