-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Wargaming, please remove the premium matchmaking for T3 and T4
mtm78 replied to kfa's topic in General Discussion
Who other then seal clubbers will have a 15 point captain on an Furutaka? -
I was/am talking with im right now through the entire evening lol that's why. He didn't read it on your forums because he lost the pwd, so well it was 15m. You know the thing with Aspys is that we like facts so when I see something which doesn't seem factual I will try and correct it. edit: but I am sorry, we're going very off topic aren't we?
-
I know. And you asked more like 15 minutes ago.
-
When this aufull joke with low tier British Cruisers will end?
mtm78 replied to Anthoniusii's topic in General Discussion
-
That was the post I responded to
-
Well because he told me many times he doesn't want any modpack to just add his mods. Unless they ask permission first. Have you asked permission yet Aslain? I'm told you haven't.
-
Wargaming, please remove the premium matchmaking for T3 and T4
mtm78 replied to kfa's topic in General Discussion
I'll give you an Omaha, and I will take any tier 7 cruiser you want ( and which I own ). We will go into a training room and play 10 1v1s. I bet you won't win a single one ( and I know you're decent player! ). And I <3 Omaha, even without the captain skills stuff which was changed ages back, in it's own MM it's really strong! Now if you mentioned that Gremmy doesn't care if it fights tier 5 6 or 7 then no one would argue.. but the cruisers are in a really bad spot ( BB's not as much, and even the DD's can work fairly well ). -
-
The game engine in last patches has added some working AA but before it was usually better to force it through driver settings. Think that's where the remark comes from
-
Sorry man but we all know Russia's navy is the reason we won WWII and that's a fact...
-
When this aufull joke with low tier British Cruisers will end?
mtm78 replied to Anthoniusii's topic in General Discussion
Automatically dismissed everything you wrote ..... Nope, don't even need to go that far, just skimming over it and seeing such statements as above automatically lead to step 4. -
Lol, more likely 8km. Can't have long range torps man, it requires teamwork to counter...
-
True. But the description ( operating at 108% ) does indicate it accelerates quicker. Wiki editors should not have put the OR behind the comma though as it breaks the entire description, it should be AND or "therefore providing an ...".
-
Tooltip even says it does right, something like "increases the time to full power with 50%'?
-
Stop sorting by useless damage ffs Or at least post both damage and win rate.
-
Wargaming, please remove the premium matchmaking for T3 and T4
mtm78 replied to kfa's topic in General Discussion
-
Wargaming, please remove the premium matchmaking for T3 and T4
mtm78 replied to kfa's topic in General Discussion
The Clevelol is much better off against Kutuzov then Omaha would be against Myoko. -
Wargaming, please remove the premium matchmaking for T3 and T4
mtm78 replied to kfa's topic in General Discussion
Ding ding we got a winner Sadly, try telling WG to put in hard caps other then CV's. Been telling this since .... idk stone age? -
Wargaming, please remove the premium matchmaking for T3 and T4
mtm78 replied to kfa's topic in General Discussion
I got 3 ( all IJN ) but I don't play them often. I am close to Hindenburg... don't know how often I will play it. But as you said, tier X isn't 'end goal' of the game. Even if it's the top tier, the goal for people depends on their needs. Do they 'embrace the grind' and go for tier X as some reward, or do they enjoy the gameplay on the way there and stay stuck if they happen to enjoy it partway through? -
Could be more crybabies who quit because of unfavorable MM... seems to be a thing. Hope WG bans all of them ASAP.
-
Seriously WG? Since WoT you still can not make a good MM?
mtm78 replied to Rozbrus's topic in General Discussion
Let's just say I feel pretty ok with my Sims facing a Benson, but a Fletcher? Best chance I have of being influential in the match is to avoid those Fletchers and go to another flank/cap if possible. As I described in another thread about the subject ( typical WG forum with multiple threads about same subject ) the problem with MM is more that some classes in some tiers scale a lot better then other classes in those same tier. I don't want to take Marblehead/Omaha or even my once beloved Murmansk in a heavy tier 7 CA matchmaking constantly. It doesn't fare that well, it's immensely frustrating since we all remember the 'happy days' of tier 5 being the sweet spot ( like tier 7 is now ). -
Wargaming, please remove the premium matchmaking for T3 and T4
mtm78 replied to kfa's topic in General Discussion
Doesn't this then indicate that the power creep with tier progression needs to be altered? Then the +-2 wouldn't be such an issue. But I guess it's tied in the BB's being 'weak'on the low tiers on purpose, this creates a dripple effect which makes the jumps in power per tier non linear. Murmansk and even Marblehead were tier 5 I enjoyed playing. But in a tier 7 match, especially Marblehead, is not playable ( when you're facing tier 7 CA's ) due to range difference. Kongo vs Nagato.. well Nagato stomps all over Kongo but Kongo is quite fast and decent range, so she has the option to be picky about where to engage a bit. Lower tier CA/CL's don't have that option.
