Jump to content
Forum Shutdown 28/7/2023 Read more... ×

mtm78

Alpha Tester
  • Content Сount

    19,378
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Battles

    6105

Everything posted by mtm78

  1. Who other then seal clubbers will have a 15 point captain on an Furutaka?
  2. mtm78

    [12.6.0] Aslain's WoWS ModPack Installer

    I was/am talking with im right now through the entire evening lol that's why. He didn't read it on your forums because he lost the pwd, so well it was 15m. You know the thing with Aspys is that we like facts so when I see something which doesn't seem factual I will try and correct it. edit: but I am sorry, we're going very off topic aren't we?
  3. mtm78

    [12.6.0] Aslain's WoWS ModPack Installer

    I know. And you asked more like 15 minutes ago.
  4. mtm78

    [12.6.0] Aslain's WoWS ModPack Installer

    That was the post I responded to
  5. mtm78

    [12.6.0] Aslain's WoWS ModPack Installer

    Well because he told me many times he doesn't want any modpack to just add his mods. Unless they ask permission first. Have you asked permission yet Aslain? I'm told you haven't.
  6. I'll give you an Omaha, and I will take any tier 7 cruiser you want ( and which I own ). We will go into a training room and play 10 1v1s. I bet you won't win a single one ( and I know you're decent player! ). And I <3 Omaha, even without the captain skills stuff which was changed ages back, in it's own MM it's really strong! Now if you mentioned that Gremmy doesn't care if it fights tier 5 6 or 7 then no one would argue.. but the cruisers are in a really bad spot ( BB's not as much, and even the DD's can work fairly well ).
  7. mtm78

    GTX 750 ti tips

    The game engine in last patches has added some working AA but before it was usually better to force it through driver settings. Think that's where the remark comes from
  8. mtm78

    Lack of RN Battleships?

    Sorry man but we all know Russia's navy is the reason we won WWII and that's a fact...
  9. Automatically dismissed everything you wrote ..... Nope, don't even need to go that far, just skimming over it and seeing such statements as above automatically lead to step 4.
  10. mtm78

    Comrade Stalin sends reinforcements

    Lol, more likely 8km. Can't have long range torps man, it requires teamwork to counter...
  11. mtm78

    The "Ask an Expert" Thread

    True. But the description ( operating at 108% ) does indicate it accelerates quicker. Wiki editors should not have put the OR behind the comma though as it breaks the entire description, it should be AND or "therefore providing an ...".
  12. mtm78

    The "Ask an Expert" Thread

    Tooltip even says it does right, something like "increases the time to full power with 50%'?
  13. Stop sorting by useless damage ffs Or at least post both damage and win rate.
  14. The Clevelol is much better off against Kutuzov then Omaha would be against Myoko.
  15. Ding ding we got a winner Sadly, try telling WG to put in hard caps other then CV's. Been telling this since .... idk stone age?
  16. I got 3 ( all IJN ) but I don't play them often. I am close to Hindenburg... don't know how often I will play it. But as you said, tier X isn't 'end goal' of the game. Even if it's the top tier, the goal for people depends on their needs. Do they 'embrace the grind' and go for tier X as some reward, or do they enjoy the gameplay on the way there and stay stuck if they happen to enjoy it partway through?
  17. mtm78

    Bot invasion on random battles?

    Could be more crybabies who quit because of unfavorable MM... seems to be a thing. Hope WG bans all of them ASAP.
  18. Let's just say I feel pretty ok with my Sims facing a Benson, but a Fletcher? Best chance I have of being influential in the match is to avoid those Fletchers and go to another flank/cap if possible. As I described in another thread about the subject ( typical WG forum with multiple threads about same subject ) the problem with MM is more that some classes in some tiers scale a lot better then other classes in those same tier. I don't want to take Marblehead/Omaha or even my once beloved Murmansk in a heavy tier 7 CA matchmaking constantly. It doesn't fare that well, it's immensely frustrating since we all remember the 'happy days' of tier 5 being the sweet spot ( like tier 7 is now ).
  19. Doesn't this then indicate that the power creep with tier progression needs to be altered? Then the +-2 wouldn't be such an issue. But I guess it's tied in the BB's being 'weak'on the low tiers on purpose, this creates a dripple effect which makes the jumps in power per tier non linear. Murmansk and even Marblehead were tier 5 I enjoyed playing. But in a tier 7 match, especially Marblehead, is not playable ( when you're facing tier 7 CA's ) due to range difference. Kongo vs Nagato.. well Nagato stomps all over Kongo but Kongo is quite fast and decent range, so she has the option to be picky about where to engage a bit. Lower tier CA/CL's don't have that option.
×