mtm78

I can't see what you're doing wrong you're hiding your profile And you dear boy would accept an historical 4% hit ratio with your BB? No, didn't think so On the other hand, yes pleas give back Long Lance torpedo's to my IJN CA's starting from Aoba as well as my IJN DD's

I don't even have an issue right now with Fire Prevention, but using a 15% win rate Kirov as example on how CA's should be played is just mind boggling Sure, BBabies should just get some skill and learn proper damage control and repair management. But it won't be as game breaking as the RPF 'skill' would be. And, WG can easilly tweak it if BBabies start to overperform even more. And yes, SC is the part of a ship which you can actually deal damage to with HE, so it will be another major buff to the BBabies. In combination with the nerved DE it will surely make BBabies become even more problematically prolific, but hey the working tittle is still World off BabyBoats And if WG sees this and doesn't adjust ( ... hope is fading though seeing recent changes ) this game will go the way of WoWp, which would be sad since it has so much potential. edit: Also a good place for WG to start to work on the existing fire issue is to remove the fire chance for BB shells completely since 'they don't need to start fires'

As it should for being the last alive which means it hasn't played according to its role. That was explained earlier...

Bad players are an issue, WG should add proper tutorials they should complete before being eligible for pvp. You can't even reply to anyone actually explaining to you why it is not an issue, how it's a balancing factor you should learn to counter. All you do is cry about a game mechanic you don't even understand, or you don't want to understand because people are trying to explain it to you and you just ignore everything which is written. And this is the feedback WG should use

RDF = radio position finding, aka Potato Finder, a skill in PTS which should never make it into the live client. Edit: sorry for off-topic.

The image is nice... The post preceding it is not

Nope, people should learn how to play. That includes working together, it's an essential part in team based mmo gaming. Sorry for double post, ipad doesn't do multi quote.

Hidden profile -check.... Ignores quotes he can't offer an rebuttal to -check......

I guess basically we're waiting for BBV to come and extend his chat ban to the forums

I explained it to you before, you didn't even respond to it since I gues you have no rebuttal to offer ->

But gud.... Belfast is a CL and you whine about them shooting from smoke lmao. And yes, invisifire really, it's what brings some more balance to the game. late edit / explanation: Belfast can not bounce even CA fire, there is no point angling. In a CA with reasonable armor there is no need for smoke. But Belfast and all the other RN CL's need it. Think it was added as a 'gimmick'? Think again, it was needed as balancing factor.

True, and pretty often around this time of the day that's all I do. But when you see someone click caps and type things in chat which is absolutely craptastic like going for the obviously wrong caps and not even thinking about team composition and spawns, I just have to look them up. And if it's another 45% 'pro player' I feel obliged to warn the team to ignore that person since unlike him I actually enjoy winning. Sadly that's "elitist" or something... Also chat ban system is progressive, get one and you need less complaints to get the next ( as I'm told at least). System is a bit sad, WG removes +- from forum because it was "toxic" but then adds it to the game Edit: piet chat bans don't stop people from playing...

I don't, since bb's now have better AAA then ca's I don't see why I need to babysit them especially since BabyBoats meta seems to resolve around long range sniping anyway. Yesterday, currysausage with a frikkin spotter plane spend all game being useless, why would anyone babysit those kind of players. No, my ca's rather just do what is needed to win the game, which usually means supporting my dd's and not the BabyBoats.

Trust me, they hand out chat bans based on complaints so you can get banned for simply saying that 45%wr players should refrain from telling team which caps to go to....

Team battles are not as valuable as the tournaments since there would be no team rosters, no streaming schedule and thus no spectators. Team battles would be nice to have back regardless but not in place of these tournaments. Especially the last tournament was an absolute pleasure to watch. The exposure for the competitive aspect of the game is a lot bigger with the tournaments. What I do hope though is that WG then also pays attention to the input of the competitive clans, which according to my knowledge have all stated RDF would kill the game.

That's bs because it's not that invisible firing capable ships don't want their paint scratched but more that that paint is their only actual armor along with not having much hp nor a way to recover said hp. Unlike the BBabies which indeed just don't want their paint scratched..

RNGesus

This is the first sign I see of moderation in the WoWs chat.. then again I tend to avoid general discussion like the plague and hang out with my fellow Forumites

I already own lots of premiums, missing from the top of my head are StinkySushi, Smith, Indianapolis, Scharnhorst and Perth. So I felt I had a pretty good chance. But it seems WG lowered the ship drop chance after the first two days ( typical bait and switch if you ask me ). I would have been happy with a Perth as well I think And I do enjoy those cammo's and flags, will come in very handy for training new captains

I'm getting chat banned for telling 45% wr 'admirals' to stop telling teams which caps to go for. System is a complete joke. The pink was deserved though but I wore it with pride

I really like that suggestion to activate freelook when pressing ctrl as I frequently find myself taking extra time to get a bearing on the bomber squad I would like to focus

Reverse Dunning-Kruger effect Your performance is all but mediocre

So my Akizuki with the 100mm pew pew's should be always visible when I shoot? How would you balance her then? Giving those 100mm the same pen and dmg as the 127/130mm DD's? Some ships, and more so, some tactics rely on invisi fire capabilities. That people don't want to learn the proper counter tactics is THEIR problem, and not something which is wrong with the game, in my humble opinion off course. There is nothing wrong with invisi fire, so nothing needs changing. Making suggestions, however flawed they would be, would only legitimize WG in their decision. So feel free to make suggestions, as long as you also don't object to me constantly pointing out the issue is not with the game, but with a part of the playerbase.

Muzzle flashes? I been blind fired by BB's at 13km with Blys just because they tracked my shells and I have no problems with that at all since it's incredibly hard to do ( -> requires skill.. and some nice RNG ). If people can track shells, it should be a bit easier if the game rendered muzzle flashes at those distances.

You could have saved you the trouble if you just checked the link and noticed it went to NA forum