-
Content Сount
19,378 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Battles
6105
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Calendar
Everything posted by mtm78
-
Are IJN destroyers just bad or am I missing something?
mtm78 replied to SaxonHoliday's topic in Destroyers
Server stats seem to not agree.... Especially comparing Yugumo to Fletcher ( best DD at tier 9 ) and Shimakaze vs both other DD's. But, Akizuki is mighty fun ( though situational ) and Shiratsuyu is very much what Shima used to be when it had better torps then Gearing. edit: damnit man you have 45% wr on your Shimakaze with 36k avg damage how in gods name can you be claiming it's passable, let alone comparable to Gearing/Fletcher? -
No they listen to feedback.... on REDDIT and RU forums, no EU edit: ow and REDDIT seems to be more a case: yes we listen, we will even respond, but we don't actually change anything based on your feedback since it's not given on RU forum
-
New tier 4 skill "Fire prevention" explanation with details anyone ?
mtm78 replied to Draconobilis's topic in Archive
You fail at trying to be funny while also spreading FUD -
Anything which is included in WG's OFFICIAL modpack is anything but 'borderline illegal'. Unless you think illegality is based on your personal morals.
-
Elimination thread 3: Tier VII *Winner!*
mtm78 replied to DDMafiaAssociateMember's topic in General Discussion
Leberecht Maass: 9Shiratsuyu: 14Mahan: 10Leningrad: 24Blyskawica: 32 + 1 = 33 Best firehose in the game at the DD side ( mind you I don't have Kebab yet.. )Myoko: 12 -3 = 9 personally Myoko just doesn't tick my boxesFlint: 23Fiji: 20Belfast: 35Gneisenau: 6 Scharnhorst: 43Hiryu (2/2/2): 19Saipan (Torpedo Bombers): 11- 452 replies
-
- Elimination
- Elimination thread
-
(and 1 more)
Tagged with:
-
New tier 4 skill "Fire prevention" explanation with details anyone ?
mtm78 replied to Draconobilis's topic in Archive
Bull. You can only have ONE fire on the superstructure, not 2. Max fires thus are bow, superstructure and stern aka 3 fires. It's even in the pn's ffs. -
Battleship armor layout vs IFHE breakpoints
mtm78 replied to ScratxNeko's topic in General Discussion
^^ -
Any chance of a nerf on this bismarck secondaries?
mtm78 replied to _x_Acheron_x_'s topic in Archive
They are just QQ'ing because they like their hydro and don't want their toys changed to fit actual ingame balance. -
Battleship armor layout vs IFHE breakpoints
mtm78 replied to ScratxNeko's topic in General Discussion
+ flags for .5% each and ur back on your old level. Akizuki seems to really want to use this perk. -
Any chance of a nerf on this bismarck secondaries?
mtm78 replied to _x_Acheron_x_'s topic in Archive
^^ Not 'I will kemp in back now and cry because my hydro is nerved a bit' but ---> 'I will still push up and brawl because I HAVE hydro unlike all those other BB's, while my rudder and turning circle are also superb unlike my top tier brethren. And I will have to push up and not be useless in the back, because my dispersion doesn't allow that'. That being said, the amount of citadels I ate this week from 15km+ Bismarcks is starting to really ffin annoy me. Either WG is giving everyone which shoots at me awesome RNG or I must be the most unlucky target for them to aim at. -
Battleship armor layout vs IFHE breakpoints
mtm78 replied to ScratxNeko's topic in General Discussion
WG: We would like to give more 'options' in captain skills.... Introduces RPF which is a must have for DD's ( at the very least ) Introduces this new HE skill which looks like a must for gunboat/s and CL's. Where are the 'options'? -
Any chance of a nerf on this bismarck secondaries?
mtm78 replied to _x_Acheron_x_'s topic in Archive
-
His hitratio's aren't even terrible, not good but not terrible. Guess he met some sealclubbers and noticed the skill difference and wants to attribute it to 'hacks'. Btw, Jesper, if you find a working aimbot please let us know ok
-
Any chance of a nerf on this bismarck secondaries?
mtm78 replied to _x_Acheron_x_'s topic in Archive
Bismarck your most played BB? With you highest win ratio at higher tiers? To many DD's? You mean to many BB's right? -
I use obs ( same as for twitch streaming ) and for free video editor Lightworks is the 'most professional' but the free version lacks proper export functions ( recently has gotten a 1080p export function for Vimeo though.. which you could use and then rip the video and reupload on YT? ). edit: links https://obsproject.com/ https://www.lwks.com/ If you have an Nvidia card you could use Shadowplay for recording.
-
Any chance of a nerf on this bismarck secondaries?
mtm78 replied to _x_Acheron_x_'s topic in Archive
Bismarck is agile enough to actually don't need hydro for that. Sorry but a big 'I CAN NOT BE TORPED TROLOLOL' button is not what the game needs. edit: nvm..... -
But feedback from RU region seems to differ a lot from what EU is saying, in particular about RDF as there is no uproar at all over there afaik. Fires, meh, no one really cares that much. The bad battleship players will live longer, the already good will live a lot longer, but we already had to deal with long living battleships and most of them are still slow so can't influence battle as much ( and the faster one's are generally having weaker torpedo protection ). It will be World of Battleships even more then it is now, but it won't immediately kill off the game, WG will have chances to tweak the skills to get a better distribution of classes in the game so gameplay will be enjoyable for all players ( or again, WoWp will have it successor ). But RDF is so blatantly stupendously broken in concept it makes me wonder what WG actually thinks of players who can properly use map positioning to get favorable engagements using concealment. Maybe they don't like good players, since we can play tier X without premium accounts and what not. The bad players all have to pay since their actual in game performance is so low in comparison the economy is just to rough on them to deal with it without giving WG money.
-
Nah come one, community contributors don't do that stuff ( in public )....
-
That;s how dyslexic people write Quantum Mechanics I think, why do you ask ( sorry I am ignoring certain people in this thread so I might be missing out on some 'informative' postings )?
-
From NA and Reddit: Public Test 0.6.0 Part 2
mtm78 replied to Leo_Apollo11's topic in General Discussion
What a load of shat... It doesn't work that way, AT ALL. -
Aka ALT_HUD, and it's legal as it's also in the official WG modpack edit: ow and pushing someone out off a bush in WoT for instance would grant you a temp account ban if the guy made a ticket with support supplied with the replay afaik iirc...
-
Mikasa and Katori have the shared lowest speed of 18kts I don't think a 15kts ship in this game is even viable, it would just always be either to late to the action or getting overrun because it can't kite from a superior force.
-
Correct -> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BAP_Almirante_Grau_(CLM-81)
-
patch. 6.0 is a massive battleship buff, nerf to the rest.
mtm78 replied to gizaman's topic in General Discussion
I would more look at survival rate in relation with damage done and win percentage. With the RN CL's each match is a nailbiter ( well mostly ). Haven't touched Mogami since I bought MK ( after AFT change ). -
patch. 6.0 is a massive battleship buff, nerf to the rest.
mtm78 replied to gizaman's topic in General Discussion
RN CL are the most skill intensive ships in the game bar none.
